This week I continued reading through the science fiction anthology Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 1 (1939), in which he and Martin Greenberg selected...forty years later...what they thought was the best of that year in short fiction. I finished three more stories, and here's my discussions for each of them...
THE ULTIMATE CATALYST by John Taine
Known more for his non-fiction, especially his biographical series on mathematicians, Taine wrote this one with a well-developed sense of biology and chemistry. It is sometime in the future and the last dictator on Earth has been exiled to a confined area in the Amazon jungle...unfortunately he still is a tyrant within that domain. Trapped there is a scientist and his daughter...he reveals to the dictator that he has developed a plant food that tastes like meat, handy in that vegetation is the only viable form of food in this region. But the scientist has ulterior motives, and this tale just might send anyone prone to queasiness right over the edge...probably a good idea not to read The Ultimate Catalyst while eating...
THE GNARLY MAN by L. Sprague de Camp
Anthropologist Matilda Saddler, after studying cultures from all over the world, finds her most interesting subject right in the middle of a Coney Island carnival show: Ungo-Bungo, a supposed ape-man whose skull bone structure seems strange to her, turns out when she meets him to be a well-spoken. amiable Irishman...until he reveals his true identity: he is the last surviving Neanderthal, some 50,000 years old. Interesting this tale is, especially in light of the Lester del Rey story The Day is Done about a different "last Neanderthal", appearing in the same anthology and which I discussed last week...
BLACK DESTROYER by A.E. von Vogt
The "black destroyer" in this tale is a "coeurl", a ferocious but highly intelligent cat-like predator...but with vibration-inducing tentacles emanating from its shoulders...inhabiting a very remote, nearly dead planet. Although essentially immortal, it is running out of food: salvation seems to have arrived with the landing of an exploratory spaceship from Earth. The humans encounter the beast...and the intricate chess game ensues between them, with not only their survival but also the future of space dominance at stake. I liked the way the author presented the coeurl's viewpoint as its remarkable adaptability is progressively revealed. But I didn't like the way that von Vogt explained its origin and even less how the story ultimately resolved itself. Plus, as is often the case with hard science fiction, much of the dialogue...especially toward the end...got too bogged down in esoteric technicalities. Still, as an adventure story it was suspenseful and interesting...it would carry over well to film...
More stories from this book next Wednesday...
Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Tuesday, October 16, 2018
Tuesday's List: The First Six Florida Constitutional Amendments on the Ballot
A few weeks ago I listed the thirteen amendments to the Florida State Constitution that are up for vote this November 6th...since then Amendment Eight has been withdrawn. Today I'm discussing...very briefly...each of the first six amendments and my take on them. For any of these amendments to be accepted in the state's constitution, they need to receive approval of at least 60% of the voters in the election. I learned a lot about them from the website Be Ready to Vote...click on it to get some needed information, complete with pros and cons for each proposed amendment. I plan to discuss Amendments Seven through Thirteen next Tuesday...
1 INCREASED HOMESTEAD TAX EXEMPTION
This amendment increases up to a maximum additional $25,000 homestead tax exemption on properties valued at $100,000 or higher. For those eligible who want to save tax money for themselves, this seems good...but local governments stand to lose an enormous amount of needed revenue should this pass...I'm voting "no".
2 LIMITATIONS ON PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENTS
This is only for non-homesteaded property and limits to 10% the taxable value increase for such property. Apartment renters and vacation home owners in particular stand to personally benefit from such an amendment, but as with the first one, this is estimated to cause a serious shortfall in local government revenue. Again, I'm voting "no".
3 VOTER CONTROL OF GAMBLING IN FLORIDA
This amendment seems to be getting the most media attention, with supporters pointing to other states of differing political orientations that have this amendment in their constitutions...let the people decide if they want a casino or not, right? But the way I see it, since casinos are a good source of government revenue, I'd rather see people voluntarily fund it playing at them than forced to through more compulsory taxes...and I really don't want to see Florida feel as if it needs to resort to a state income tax. Since voting "yes" will inhibit casinos, I'm voting "no" although I'm personally no fan of gambling...
4 VOTING RESTORATION
This amendment restores full voting rights to convicted felons...excluding murderers or those convicted of sex crimes...once they have completed their sentences and are no longer on probation or parole. The current state law, which is undergoing a court challenge right now, mandates five years before a felon can even begin a tedious application process to restore voting rights. I'm voting "yes"...I believe in the restoration of rights (and hope) after criminals have served their punishment, otherwise rehabilitation means nothing...
5 SUPERMAJORITY VOTE REQUIRED TO IMPOSE, AUTHORIZE, OR RAISE STATE TAXES OR FEES
This amendment, pushed by Tea Party Governor Rick Scott, makes it very difficult to raise taxes and may in the end necessitate cuts to important state services, including those to people unable to fend for themselves. If you're a "never tax" Floridian, vote for it...I'm noting "no"...
6 RIGHTS OF CRIME VICTIMS; JUDGES
While increasing the mandatory retirement age of judges from 70 to 75, this amendment gives emphasis to crime victims. The website I referred to mentioned that many of this amendment's provisions are already state law. There is also proposed a further time limitation on convicts' appeals...and eliminates a section already in law that prevents victims' rights from interfering with those of the accused. I'm fine with letting judges work to 75. About the time limit on appeals I'm unsure...how far does it go? But what killed this amendment for me was allowing victims' rights to impinge upon those of the accused...as a friend of mine recently remarked: innocent until proven guilty and let nothing unfairly interfere with due process. This amendment in a revised form might be acceptable to me as I also care about crime victims, but I'm voting "no"...I'm also wary of the distorted TV ads in favor of it that appear to equate suspects with convicts...
One thing about the above amendments, as well as those that follow: the fact that they are on the ballot in the first place, to me, seems to be an indictment against the ability or willingness of a sitting state government, composed of the governor, the senate, and the house...all controlled by the same party...to govern and pass meaningful legislation. After all, didn't we elect them to represent us and pass laws? Oh well, as I said, the election is November 6th...
1 INCREASED HOMESTEAD TAX EXEMPTION
This amendment increases up to a maximum additional $25,000 homestead tax exemption on properties valued at $100,000 or higher. For those eligible who want to save tax money for themselves, this seems good...but local governments stand to lose an enormous amount of needed revenue should this pass...I'm voting "no".
2 LIMITATIONS ON PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENTS
This is only for non-homesteaded property and limits to 10% the taxable value increase for such property. Apartment renters and vacation home owners in particular stand to personally benefit from such an amendment, but as with the first one, this is estimated to cause a serious shortfall in local government revenue. Again, I'm voting "no".
3 VOTER CONTROL OF GAMBLING IN FLORIDA
This amendment seems to be getting the most media attention, with supporters pointing to other states of differing political orientations that have this amendment in their constitutions...let the people decide if they want a casino or not, right? But the way I see it, since casinos are a good source of government revenue, I'd rather see people voluntarily fund it playing at them than forced to through more compulsory taxes...and I really don't want to see Florida feel as if it needs to resort to a state income tax. Since voting "yes" will inhibit casinos, I'm voting "no" although I'm personally no fan of gambling...
4 VOTING RESTORATION
This amendment restores full voting rights to convicted felons...excluding murderers or those convicted of sex crimes...once they have completed their sentences and are no longer on probation or parole. The current state law, which is undergoing a court challenge right now, mandates five years before a felon can even begin a tedious application process to restore voting rights. I'm voting "yes"...I believe in the restoration of rights (and hope) after criminals have served their punishment, otherwise rehabilitation means nothing...
5 SUPERMAJORITY VOTE REQUIRED TO IMPOSE, AUTHORIZE, OR RAISE STATE TAXES OR FEES
This amendment, pushed by Tea Party Governor Rick Scott, makes it very difficult to raise taxes and may in the end necessitate cuts to important state services, including those to people unable to fend for themselves. If you're a "never tax" Floridian, vote for it...I'm noting "no"...
6 RIGHTS OF CRIME VICTIMS; JUDGES
While increasing the mandatory retirement age of judges from 70 to 75, this amendment gives emphasis to crime victims. The website I referred to mentioned that many of this amendment's provisions are already state law. There is also proposed a further time limitation on convicts' appeals...and eliminates a section already in law that prevents victims' rights from interfering with those of the accused. I'm fine with letting judges work to 75. About the time limit on appeals I'm unsure...how far does it go? But what killed this amendment for me was allowing victims' rights to impinge upon those of the accused...as a friend of mine recently remarked: innocent until proven guilty and let nothing unfairly interfere with due process. This amendment in a revised form might be acceptable to me as I also care about crime victims, but I'm voting "no"...I'm also wary of the distorted TV ads in favor of it that appear to equate suspects with convicts...
One thing about the above amendments, as well as those that follow: the fact that they are on the ballot in the first place, to me, seems to be an indictment against the ability or willingness of a sitting state government, composed of the governor, the senate, and the house...all controlled by the same party...to govern and pass meaningful legislation. After all, didn't we elect them to represent us and pass laws? Oh well, as I said, the election is November 6th...
Monday, October 15, 2018
Just Finished Reading The Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas
The Three Musketeers, by French novelist Alexandre Dumas, is one of those books that I probably should have read back in school...better late than never, I say. Dumas published in it 1844, but this historical novel's theme goes back to the 1620s during the reign of France's Louis XIII and England's Charles I. The two kingdoms seem to be in a perennial state of conflict, either in war or preparing for it. The French king has a special guard unit, called the musketeers, that operates independently of other forces, and the Cardinal has his own guard that often battles that of the King's...most particularly those musketeers. There are special musketeers, called "the inseparables", named Athos, Parthos, and Aramis...hence the book's title. A young man from Gascony province, d'Artagnan, has arrived seeking to be accepted by the musketeers and trained into their group. But he gets drawn into a scuffle with a mystery man and loses his father's letter to their leader. Disappointed, d'Artagnan finds himself first accidentally drawn into duels with the three musketeers and then, united with them, fends off an attack from the Cardinal's guards...in doing so gaining the good graces of the King and resulting in his appointment to the King's guard...
The Three Musketeers is full of "honor" and dueling to the death in its defense, something I'm not very enthusiastic about. It all seems so immature and pointless as it is near-to-impossible for one man to have a simple conversation with another without it ending in an insult and an invitation to fight it out. While this nonsense is going on, there is intrigue between the King of France, his wife Anne (who is also Queen of Austria), the Cardinal, and Lord Buckingham of England...the most powerful man there behind King Charles. Rochefort, the mystery man d'Artagnan earlier encountered and is always seeking for revenge, along with Milady de Winter, one of literature's greatest villainesses, work for Cardinal Richelieu while Constance Bonacieux, working for the Queen, is d'Artagnan's love interest. The plot gets pretty convoluted, and predictably in this context of international conflict and intrigue, not all survive to the end...
There apparently really was a historical d'Artagnan as well as the three musketeers: Dumas derived much of his material from his knowledge of that era's history as well as another Frenchman's semi-fictional work from 1700. As it turns out, The Three Musketeers was the first of a series that Alexandre Dumas wrote, and he had a collaborator with these novels: August Maquete. Probably needless to say, I read an English translation of this work, not the French original. Did I like this novel? Once I got past the buffoonery with the incessant dueling, I began to enjoy the different characters as well as learning quite a bit about early 17th century European history...including an important assassination that occurred in 1628...
The Three Musketeers is full of "honor" and dueling to the death in its defense, something I'm not very enthusiastic about. It all seems so immature and pointless as it is near-to-impossible for one man to have a simple conversation with another without it ending in an insult and an invitation to fight it out. While this nonsense is going on, there is intrigue between the King of France, his wife Anne (who is also Queen of Austria), the Cardinal, and Lord Buckingham of England...the most powerful man there behind King Charles. Rochefort, the mystery man d'Artagnan earlier encountered and is always seeking for revenge, along with Milady de Winter, one of literature's greatest villainesses, work for Cardinal Richelieu while Constance Bonacieux, working for the Queen, is d'Artagnan's love interest. The plot gets pretty convoluted, and predictably in this context of international conflict and intrigue, not all survive to the end...
There apparently really was a historical d'Artagnan as well as the three musketeers: Dumas derived much of his material from his knowledge of that era's history as well as another Frenchman's semi-fictional work from 1700. As it turns out, The Three Musketeers was the first of a series that Alexandre Dumas wrote, and he had a collaborator with these novels: August Maquete. Probably needless to say, I read an English translation of this work, not the French original. Did I like this novel? Once I got past the buffoonery with the incessant dueling, I began to enjoy the different characters as well as learning quite a bit about early 17th century European history...including an important assassination that occurred in 1628...
Sunday, October 14, 2018
Comments and Cognitive Reverie
One of the problems, which incidentally is simultaneously a blessing, when I dutifully post in Facebook each of this blog's articles (which are published through Google's Blogger site), is that readers tend to not only know me personally but also know, should they choose to place a comment, that their opinions will be open for all to read and that they will be instantly identified with them. Sometimes, as mathematician John Nash, while speculating on a win-win mathematical model scenario, once remarked to a friend in the movie A Beautiful Mind, "You have no respect for cognitive reverie", I like to just sit back and look at things from different perspectives. I want this blog to be more oriented toward open speculation and "cognitive reverie" as well, but I'm afraid that, with a couple of noteworthy exceptions, folks just aren't comfortable with opening up with their thoughts and reactions. There is a solution to this, though: anyone reading this blog, whether through Facebook or directly on the web, can submit their own comments to me. I have it set up on my blog to directly take comments (bypassing Facebook) without them immediately appearing. Before I publish any, I need to first review them...my initial primary reason for this was to avoid publishing the numerous spam comments that were beginning to proliferate. Now, though, pre-screening is useful in that anyone can submit to me his or her comment and then ask me NOT to publish it...I'll comply with any such request. Also, anonymous comments can be submitted as well...if they don't sound like spam and aren't demeaning or profane, then likewise they'll be published at the end of the article (within the blog). In any event, I always endeavor to respond to any reasonable comment, regardless whether I agree or disagree with the expressed view, in a respectful and appreciative manner...
Cognitive reverie to me is an activity in which one isn't tied down to any kind of dogma or ideology, instead just taking a particular subject and breaking it down...sometimes coming to conclusions that don't fit the mainstream of socially-promulgated thought. Therefore it grieves me somewhat when I go down this road and then get a reaction from someone who is an ideologue, forming their opinions on just about everything based on what somebody else wrote or said that fits their "party line"...to me, that is the opposite of what I would call cognitive reverie. Such people can easily disprove this about themselves by simply revealing to me at least one issue (the more the better) in which they agree with the "other side's" views. Another way is to make their opinions more personal and to explain how they interact with their own life and experiences...or explain the thinking process that led them to their conclusions. To me, a natural product of thinking for yourself is to sometimes arrive at different conclusions to things that a particular ideology or doctrine espouses. Thinking for yourself through the vehicle of open speculation and cognitive reverie also makes you more interesting to others instead of sounding like an obvious one-dimensional, unimaginative copycat hack...
Cognitive reverie to me is an activity in which one isn't tied down to any kind of dogma or ideology, instead just taking a particular subject and breaking it down...sometimes coming to conclusions that don't fit the mainstream of socially-promulgated thought. Therefore it grieves me somewhat when I go down this road and then get a reaction from someone who is an ideologue, forming their opinions on just about everything based on what somebody else wrote or said that fits their "party line"...to me, that is the opposite of what I would call cognitive reverie. Such people can easily disprove this about themselves by simply revealing to me at least one issue (the more the better) in which they agree with the "other side's" views. Another way is to make their opinions more personal and to explain how they interact with their own life and experiences...or explain the thinking process that led them to their conclusions. To me, a natural product of thinking for yourself is to sometimes arrive at different conclusions to things that a particular ideology or doctrine espouses. Thinking for yourself through the vehicle of open speculation and cognitive reverie also makes you more interesting to others instead of sounding like an obvious one-dimensional, unimaginative copycat hack...
Saturday, October 13, 2018
This Week's Football Polls Perplexing with LSU, Fla, and Ky
As games across the South are either finished, in progress, or scheduled for later, the two standing college football polls, the Associated Press and USA Today/Coaches, currently have several Southeastern Conference schools in their respective Top 25...no surprise here since it's the premier conference in the sport. Three 5-1 teams...LSU, Florida, and Kentucky, are ranked in the "teens": LSU is 13th, Florida 14th, and Kentucky 18th in the AP, while with the coaches it's LSU 12th, Florida 16th, and Kentucky 20th. So all three teams have the same win-loss record. However, Florida beat LSU...so why are they ranked behind them? And Kentucky beat Florida...so why are they likewise ranked worse? This is one of the problems I have with these polls...I remember many years when the Gators would play and defeat Tennessee early in the season...as the season wore on, Florida would play well but usually lose one or two more games, while the Volunteers, ending up with no better a record than Florida, would stack up win after win, ending up ranked higher at the season's end. Is there a built-in prejudice here? Probably in both cases...nowadays LSU is expected to be highly ranked, Florida hasn't cracked the Top Ten in years, and Kentucky has traditionally been identified with the league's doormats. But things have changed, and you might think that the sports journalists and coaches would be up-to-date on them, especially which teams won in head-to-head competition...
By the way, at this writing LSU is beating Georgia 16-0 at halftime, Florida came back from a 21-3 deficit to win over Vanderbilt 37-27, and Kentucky has a bye week. Two weeks from now the Gators face Georgia in Jacksonville...
By the way, at this writing LSU is beating Georgia 16-0 at halftime, Florida came back from a 21-3 deficit to win over Vanderbilt 37-27, and Kentucky has a bye week. Two weeks from now the Gators face Georgia in Jacksonville...
Friday, October 12, 2018
Quote of the Week...from Stephen King
Get certain. Do your job. Vote. ---Stephen King
Often when I present someone's quote on this blog I don't know the context in which he or she is making it. Gladly, this is not the case with Stephen King's quote: he posted it yesterday on Twitter, with a link to a tweet from USA Today that read, "A new survey found that just 35 percent of Americans ages 18-29 are 'absolutely certain' that they will vote in November." King wasn't very happy about that number, consequently his admonition. I, on the other hand, am astounded in a positive sense with it, as I will explain...
As I showed in my Tuesday article this week, the percentage of registered voters aged 18-29 has been utterly dismal for off-year general elections, i.e. elections in even-numbered years when the presidency wasn't being voted on (like 2018). Their voting turnout for 2002, 2006, 2010, and 2014 was 18.2%, 20.3%, 20.3%, and 16.3%, respectively. So for registered voters in this age range to rise up to 35% for this coming election is certainly encouraging...but that's not all. The USA Today report expressed 35% of Americans 18-29, not just registered Americans in that group! Maybe they misreported this part, but if even if they did, we may be looking at a lot of surprises on election night, November 6th...
Often when I present someone's quote on this blog I don't know the context in which he or she is making it. Gladly, this is not the case with Stephen King's quote: he posted it yesterday on Twitter, with a link to a tweet from USA Today that read, "A new survey found that just 35 percent of Americans ages 18-29 are 'absolutely certain' that they will vote in November." King wasn't very happy about that number, consequently his admonition. I, on the other hand, am astounded in a positive sense with it, as I will explain...
As I showed in my Tuesday article this week, the percentage of registered voters aged 18-29 has been utterly dismal for off-year general elections, i.e. elections in even-numbered years when the presidency wasn't being voted on (like 2018). Their voting turnout for 2002, 2006, 2010, and 2014 was 18.2%, 20.3%, 20.3%, and 16.3%, respectively. So for registered voters in this age range to rise up to 35% for this coming election is certainly encouraging...but that's not all. The USA Today report expressed 35% of Americans 18-29, not just registered Americans in that group! Maybe they misreported this part, but if even if they did, we may be looking at a lot of surprises on election night, November 6th...
Thursday, October 11, 2018
10/7 Sermon on Miracles, Part 5
This past Sunday at The Family Church here in Gainesville, senior pastor Philip Griffin discussed the fifth of seven signs, or miracles, performed by Jesus as revealed in the New Testament Gospel of John. This miracle, in which Jesus revealed himself as "Lord of the Storm" when he walked on water and calmed that storm, is described in John 6: 16-21...click on the passage to read it via Bible Gateway. In introducing this message, Pastor Philip reminded us that these miracles served the purpose of pointing to who Jesus is and what he does...
The severe and dire storm that the disciples endured on their boat in the Sea of Galilee connects with the storms that we experience nowadays in our lives: Jesus is instrumental in both. For storms, as Pastor Philip related, are unavoidable, Jesus comes to us in our storms, and he wants us to trust him to get us through them. Not only weren't the disciples spared from their storm, but Jesus had in fact sent them into it. Pastor Philip speculated that the disciples, during their long ordeal fighting the storm, may have grumbled "this isn't fair" or "why did Jesus lead us here", but at the darkest hour of the night he came to meet them. Jesus likewise comes the closest to us in our own darkest hours. Philip noted that when Jesus reached where the boat was, he began to pass them by...why? Jesus wanted them to call out to him and invite him into their boat and into their situation...this way letting him be Lord of the Storm for them. God's greatest desire is for us to depend on him and trust in him. A lot of us are mad at Jesus and are unwilling to ask him into our boat for different reasons...here are four that our pastor mentioned: "I don't believe he can do anything about the storm", "I'm mad at Jesus for allowing the storm", "I'm proud, so I won't ask for help, and "I think Jesus has given up on me". But on that night on the Sea of Galilee, as Pastor Philip concluded, Jesus changed everything, calming both the storm and his disciples...his presence calms us as well in our storms...
You can watch this week's sermon by clicking on the following link to the church's YouTube video website: [TFC Videos]. The Family Church meets each Sunday morning for the weekly message, praise and worship music, prayer, and fellowship. The people are friendly and there's free coffee offered in the hospitality room before and between services. The series on miracles continues this Sunday...
The severe and dire storm that the disciples endured on their boat in the Sea of Galilee connects with the storms that we experience nowadays in our lives: Jesus is instrumental in both. For storms, as Pastor Philip related, are unavoidable, Jesus comes to us in our storms, and he wants us to trust him to get us through them. Not only weren't the disciples spared from their storm, but Jesus had in fact sent them into it. Pastor Philip speculated that the disciples, during their long ordeal fighting the storm, may have grumbled "this isn't fair" or "why did Jesus lead us here", but at the darkest hour of the night he came to meet them. Jesus likewise comes the closest to us in our own darkest hours. Philip noted that when Jesus reached where the boat was, he began to pass them by...why? Jesus wanted them to call out to him and invite him into their boat and into their situation...this way letting him be Lord of the Storm for them. God's greatest desire is for us to depend on him and trust in him. A lot of us are mad at Jesus and are unwilling to ask him into our boat for different reasons...here are four that our pastor mentioned: "I don't believe he can do anything about the storm", "I'm mad at Jesus for allowing the storm", "I'm proud, so I won't ask for help, and "I think Jesus has given up on me". But on that night on the Sea of Galilee, as Pastor Philip concluded, Jesus changed everything, calming both the storm and his disciples...his presence calms us as well in our storms...
You can watch this week's sermon by clicking on the following link to the church's YouTube video website: [TFC Videos]. The Family Church meets each Sunday morning for the weekly message, praise and worship music, prayer, and fellowship. The people are friendly and there's free coffee offered in the hospitality room before and between services. The series on miracles continues this Sunday...
Wednesday, October 10, 2018
Weekly Short Stories: '39 Sci-Fi, Part 2
This week I continued reading through the science fiction short story anthology Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 1 (1939), which DAW published in paperback in 1979, as I read two more stories: Cloak of Aesir by Don A. Stuart and The Day is Done by Lester del Rey. The former is about humanity's fate in a distant future under the yoke of alien conquerors while the latter goes thousands of years into the past as modern humans witness the end of the Neanderthals, which they supplanted...
Cloak of Aesir is the longest story in the book and may also be the one most loaded down with technical details...it might help you if you're adept at the intricacies of subatomic physics...I'm not. Don A. Stuart is the pen name for John W. Campbell, Jr., the noted long-time editor of the magazine Astounding Science Fiction. The story revolves around an uprising of humans against the planet-wide despotic-but-relatively benevolent rule by the Sarn, a humanoid-like race that conquered Earth in a very destructive war some four thousand years earlier in our late twentieth century. One man has invented a cloak...hence the story's title...that not only shields him from any weapon the Sarn can throw at him, but can also produce its own effects on the occupying enemy through the concept of "negative energy" (referring back to my aforementioned suggestion about subatomic physics). The Sarn leader, a virtually immortal woman (their society is strictly matriarchal), is wise both in tactics of rule both over the humans and her own power-hungry rivals, but four thousand years is a very long time in which her foes can develop their own brilliant secret strategies. How the story develops and ends...well, I'm not going to spoil it for you. I will say this: the ending is worth plowing through all the technical details, much of which was over my head...
Much shorter and more to my liking is Lester del Rey's The Day is Done. This is the writer who, three years later in 1942, would write Nerves, a story about a nuclear reactor meltdown, thirteen years before there was ever such a thing as a nuclear reactor! Del Rey goes back in time and speculates about Hwoogh, the last Neanderthal on Earth. Marginalized and ridiculed but still cared for by the band of Cro-Magnons he lives with, this is what I call a tear-jerker of a tale. Hwoogh has his own memories of life with his kind, and how his world drastically changed with the advent of the "Talkers", which he called the Cro-Magnons. Although it deals with the distant past, there are applications to this story in today's world, in any setting in which people find themselves marginalized and often demeaned and abused by others due to their disability, disfigurement...or even just looking different. I strongly recommend The Day is Done, but you might want to keep a box of Kleenex handy should the tears start flowing...
And onward I march through this book: five stories down, fifteen to go...
Cloak of Aesir is the longest story in the book and may also be the one most loaded down with technical details...it might help you if you're adept at the intricacies of subatomic physics...I'm not. Don A. Stuart is the pen name for John W. Campbell, Jr., the noted long-time editor of the magazine Astounding Science Fiction. The story revolves around an uprising of humans against the planet-wide despotic-but-relatively benevolent rule by the Sarn, a humanoid-like race that conquered Earth in a very destructive war some four thousand years earlier in our late twentieth century. One man has invented a cloak...hence the story's title...that not only shields him from any weapon the Sarn can throw at him, but can also produce its own effects on the occupying enemy through the concept of "negative energy" (referring back to my aforementioned suggestion about subatomic physics). The Sarn leader, a virtually immortal woman (their society is strictly matriarchal), is wise both in tactics of rule both over the humans and her own power-hungry rivals, but four thousand years is a very long time in which her foes can develop their own brilliant secret strategies. How the story develops and ends...well, I'm not going to spoil it for you. I will say this: the ending is worth plowing through all the technical details, much of which was over my head...
Much shorter and more to my liking is Lester del Rey's The Day is Done. This is the writer who, three years later in 1942, would write Nerves, a story about a nuclear reactor meltdown, thirteen years before there was ever such a thing as a nuclear reactor! Del Rey goes back in time and speculates about Hwoogh, the last Neanderthal on Earth. Marginalized and ridiculed but still cared for by the band of Cro-Magnons he lives with, this is what I call a tear-jerker of a tale. Hwoogh has his own memories of life with his kind, and how his world drastically changed with the advent of the "Talkers", which he called the Cro-Magnons. Although it deals with the distant past, there are applications to this story in today's world, in any setting in which people find themselves marginalized and often demeaned and abused by others due to their disability, disfigurement...or even just looking different. I strongly recommend The Day is Done, but you might want to keep a box of Kleenex handy should the tears start flowing...
And onward I march through this book: five stories down, fifteen to go...
Tuesday, October 9, 2018
Tuesday's List: National Voter Turnout Since 2000
I have often berated registered voters for skipping off-year elections, i.e. the general elections in which the presidency is not at stake. Still, the entire U.S. House of Representatives is elected in each of those years as well as one third of the Senate and a high percentage of state governorships...not to mention the many state and local political seats. Your president is not the king: there's a lot more to our republic with its elected representatives on several levels...but if you won't vote in these elections, don't then turn around and complain about the politicians that you allowed OTHERS to elect. I say this in particular to the younger voters, who are notorious as a group for only voting in presidential elections. I'm not picking on today's millennials, either...this apathy among the 18-29 age group consistently goes back many years...
I compiled a list of national voter turnout for general elections in even-numbered years since 2000. With each year I have listed the national voter turnout percentage, the percentage for voters 60 and older, and then the percentage for that group of 18-29. If you're wondering about the voters in the 30-59 age group, their percentages are consistently between the oldest and youngest groups. Florida usually has a higher turnout than the national average by a few percentage points, understandable since it also has a higher percentage of seniors in its population. Here's my list, with the data derived from the United States Election Project website. To make my point as clear as possible, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016 were presidential election years while 2002, 2006, 2010, and 2014 were off-year elections. Need I say to my younger friends that the upcoming 2018 general election beckons you to buck the trend and get to the polls this time around? Well, I'm saying it anyway: VOTE!
YEAR NATIONAL 60+ 18-29
2000 55.3 67.3 34.5
2002 40.5 57.1 18.2
2004 60.7 69.7 45.0
2006 41.3 57.6 20.3
2008 62.2 71.0 48.4
2010 41.8 59.0 20.3
2012 58.6 71.2 40.9
2014 36.7 54.9 16.3
2016 60.1 71.4 43.4
2018 ???? ???? ????
I compiled a list of national voter turnout for general elections in even-numbered years since 2000. With each year I have listed the national voter turnout percentage, the percentage for voters 60 and older, and then the percentage for that group of 18-29. If you're wondering about the voters in the 30-59 age group, their percentages are consistently between the oldest and youngest groups. Florida usually has a higher turnout than the national average by a few percentage points, understandable since it also has a higher percentage of seniors in its population. Here's my list, with the data derived from the United States Election Project website. To make my point as clear as possible, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016 were presidential election years while 2002, 2006, 2010, and 2014 were off-year elections. Need I say to my younger friends that the upcoming 2018 general election beckons you to buck the trend and get to the polls this time around? Well, I'm saying it anyway: VOTE!
YEAR NATIONAL 60+ 18-29
2000 55.3 67.3 34.5
2002 40.5 57.1 18.2
2004 60.7 69.7 45.0
2006 41.3 57.6 20.3
2008 62.2 71.0 48.4
2010 41.8 59.0 20.3
2012 58.6 71.2 40.9
2014 36.7 54.9 16.3
2016 60.1 71.4 43.4
2018 ???? ???? ????
Monday, October 8, 2018
Just Finished Reading The Wonderful Wizard of Oz by L. Frank Baum
Last year when I visited my sister in Austin, Texas, she had on one of her bookshelves the entire collection of L. Frank Baum's Oz series of children's books. Intrigued by them, I resolved to read through them some day: after all, the 1939 The Wizard of Oz, for most of my childhood, reigned supreme by far as my favorite, must-see movie. LibriVox is a free site that provides audiobooks for works that have fallen into the public domain, as is the case for Baum's series. I was able to listen to the first book from 1902, appropriately titled The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, through LibriVox via YouTube...pretty cool! The book story differed in a number of ways from the movie, most strikingly in that while the film version with Judy Garland as Dorothy and Margaret Hamilton as the very scary Wicked Witch of the West can be pretty frightening for little children, Baum in his preface to this book wrote that he deliberately set out with this series to provide a set of modern fairy tales that weren't as scary as older, more traditional ones. Also, in the movie it's all a dream in the end: not the case in the book. There are numerous other differences between the two versions as well (e.g. Dorothy's ruby slippers from the movie are silver in the book)...all in all I enjoyed the book, and the person recording it did a good job...much better than I would have done. Now I'm moving on to book #2, titled The Marvelous Land of Oz...
Sunday, October 7, 2018
After Confirmation, My Take on Brett Kavanaugh
For a while after President Trump had nominated federal appeals judge Brett Kavanaugh to replace retiring associate justice Anthony Kennedy on the United States Supreme Court, I would from time to time weigh in here on this blog about Kavanaugh, usually expressing my approval...in spite of me being generally of a more liberal political orientation. To me, it was obvious that we were going to get a conservative justice from this conservative administration: this nominee struck me as conscientious and scrupulous in his view of the law, most likely better than others Trump might have selected. When I watched and listened to the confirmation hearings, I was dismayed at the numerous heckling disruptions, the unwarranted interruptions by Democratic senators, and the generally rude and cold line of questioning they imposed on Kavanaugh...I thought the nominee acquitted himself very well and weathered this storm of opposition. And then came the allegation from an anonymous source, a woman claiming that Kavanaugh had attempted sexual assault on her back in the early 1980s when they were both in their teens while attending a party. The accuser stepped forward as a California college professor, Christine Ford, and she ended up testifying before an extended meeting of the Judiciary Committee. After a very limited FBI investigation of her claims and those of others, the Senate ended up confirming Kavanaugh to the Court, with the final vote being 50-48, Joe Manchin of West Virginia being the only Democrat voting for him. Friday the confirmation hung in the balance until "moderate" Republican senator Susan Collins of Maine announced her support of Kavanaugh...Manchin closely followed her, saying that he believed Ford's testimony in spite of his support for the nominee. I said that I would wait until I could compare the testimonies of Ford and Kavanaugh before I would say where I stood on the nomination. Now it's over...at least the part leading to Kavanaugh's seating on the high bench...so I'll say it: I believe Christine Ford's account, I think Kavanaugh lied about his past, and I would have consequently voted "no" had the honor been accorded me...
I have recently been on jury duty, something that you probably already know if you've read this blog any amount of time. There was the defendant, who was charged with attempted sexual battery, and the prosecution presented a very detailed case involving witness testimony and physical evidence of the crime. The Kavanaugh confirmation process was by its intended nature a political one, and the same criteria for making decisions as a jurist did not apply here. After all, they were considering someone for a very powerful, lifetime seat that could affect the lives of untold numbers of people in this country for decades to come. Given the fact that, had Kavanaugh's nomination gone down to defeat, Trump would have picked another equally-or-more conservative person as the new nominee, it makes no sense for any senator who, after stating that they believed the accuser...meaning by direct implication that Kavanaugh did attempt to rape her...to vote Kavanaugh into such a high position of honor, responsibility, and trust. And had he been voted down, he still would have retained his lifetime position as a federal appeals court judge...something I'm not so keen on either. So for Senator Manchin to state that he believed Ford while voting for Kavanaugh is cynical politics at its worst: he's running for reelection next month as a Democratic senator in staunchly pro-Trump West Virginia...I'm now hoping that he gets his ass kicked...
So what do I think now about Brett Kavanaugh? Well, there's a small sliver of hope that I hold out for our latest Supreme Court justice...let me explain. In looking over this individual's life-span, two personality traits have come out about him as I see it. One, whatever he happened to be involved in, be it studying hard in school, assisting an independent prosecutor in trying to take down a sitting president, assisting another sitting president in his various policy matters, marrying and raising a family, serving as an appeals court judge...and, yes, as a youth partaking in the rowdy, drunken party scene...involving the degradation of women...with his fellow rich, privileged classmates, Brett Kavanaugh has jumped into it with focused enthusiasm while at the same time compartmentalizing each area, acting fuzzy with his memory whenever it suits his interests. The other is that he has insisted on being the "Alpha Dog", the "head-honcho" in all of these, quite content with being the leader. Now that he's going to be on the Supreme Court, will he fully commit himself to this institution, trying to excel to his best while assuming the role of a consensus-forming leader? Who knows, I'd like to hope this will happen, but I have serious doubts. Oh, by the way: this morning Stephen King tweeted, "When Al Franken was accused of sexual impropriety, Susan Collins demanded he resign. Without a hearing." What a difference political expediency makes with one's so-called "principles"...
One footnote to all this is the extensive protesting that I'm seeing about Kavanaugh. I wonder how utterly misguided people can be when all they have to do is get off their collective butts and vote in each and every election...but instead seem to believe that demonstrating like this defines their democratic experience! You can stomp around with your signs and yell to your hearts' content: it won't throw out a single bum...but voting will...
I have recently been on jury duty, something that you probably already know if you've read this blog any amount of time. There was the defendant, who was charged with attempted sexual battery, and the prosecution presented a very detailed case involving witness testimony and physical evidence of the crime. The Kavanaugh confirmation process was by its intended nature a political one, and the same criteria for making decisions as a jurist did not apply here. After all, they were considering someone for a very powerful, lifetime seat that could affect the lives of untold numbers of people in this country for decades to come. Given the fact that, had Kavanaugh's nomination gone down to defeat, Trump would have picked another equally-or-more conservative person as the new nominee, it makes no sense for any senator who, after stating that they believed the accuser...meaning by direct implication that Kavanaugh did attempt to rape her...to vote Kavanaugh into such a high position of honor, responsibility, and trust. And had he been voted down, he still would have retained his lifetime position as a federal appeals court judge...something I'm not so keen on either. So for Senator Manchin to state that he believed Ford while voting for Kavanaugh is cynical politics at its worst: he's running for reelection next month as a Democratic senator in staunchly pro-Trump West Virginia...I'm now hoping that he gets his ass kicked...
So what do I think now about Brett Kavanaugh? Well, there's a small sliver of hope that I hold out for our latest Supreme Court justice...let me explain. In looking over this individual's life-span, two personality traits have come out about him as I see it. One, whatever he happened to be involved in, be it studying hard in school, assisting an independent prosecutor in trying to take down a sitting president, assisting another sitting president in his various policy matters, marrying and raising a family, serving as an appeals court judge...and, yes, as a youth partaking in the rowdy, drunken party scene...involving the degradation of women...with his fellow rich, privileged classmates, Brett Kavanaugh has jumped into it with focused enthusiasm while at the same time compartmentalizing each area, acting fuzzy with his memory whenever it suits his interests. The other is that he has insisted on being the "Alpha Dog", the "head-honcho" in all of these, quite content with being the leader. Now that he's going to be on the Supreme Court, will he fully commit himself to this institution, trying to excel to his best while assuming the role of a consensus-forming leader? Who knows, I'd like to hope this will happen, but I have serious doubts. Oh, by the way: this morning Stephen King tweeted, "When Al Franken was accused of sexual impropriety, Susan Collins demanded he resign. Without a hearing." What a difference political expediency makes with one's so-called "principles"...
One footnote to all this is the extensive protesting that I'm seeing about Kavanaugh. I wonder how utterly misguided people can be when all they have to do is get off their collective butts and vote in each and every election...but instead seem to believe that demonstrating like this defines their democratic experience! You can stomp around with your signs and yell to your hearts' content: it won't throw out a single bum...but voting will...
Saturday, October 6, 2018
Just Finished Reading The Door Into Summer by Robert Heinlein
The Door Into Summer, besides being the title of a good 1967 Monkees song (with Michael Nesmith on vocals), is also a 1957 science fiction novel by Robert Heinlein. In this story, Heinlein reverted back to his old love, which was writing about time travel and speculating about interesting scenarios that can arise from it. Dan Davis is a talented inventor of robots living in 1970...the future from the author's perspective...and has just survived a limited nuclear war and the end of communism. His future looks bright with his fledgling company and engagement to pretty Belle Darkin. But Davis's business partner Miles Gentry and Belle conspire to take over the company and boot him out, leaving him with his only real friend left...his pugnacious cat Pete. But Davis hasn't thrown in the towel: he makes financial preparations and takes advantage of the burgeoning market in "cold sleep", i.e. suspended animation, ending up awakening in the year 2000...way off there in the future. There are all sorts of plot manipulations that happen...this is where I leave you, the potential reader, to discover what ensues. But the bottom line is that Dan Davis uses both cold sleep and time travel to change his life and that of others, much in the same fashion that Harry Potter and Hermione Granger pulled it off in J.K. Rowling's third Harry Potter book, The Prisoner of Askaban...after reading Heinlein's book, Rowling didn't seem quite as ingenious to me as before...
The Door Into Summer has a humorous undertone throughout, and it's a book for cat lovers as the author most likely was one as well. What stood out to me, besides the usual missed predictions about the future, was one that was eerily on target: Heinlein's (remember he's writing this in 1957) relating of the Stock Market Panic of 1987...which actually happened! Another thing that made an impact on me was that the author, himself of no religious persuasion, seemed to be acknowledging the presence of a guiding intelligent force in the universe, one that enabled the time-travelling protagonist to avoid committing paradoxes by altering outcomes ever-so-slightly. I enjoyed this book, but in all honesty prefer some of Heinlein's others...
The Door Into Summer has a humorous undertone throughout, and it's a book for cat lovers as the author most likely was one as well. What stood out to me, besides the usual missed predictions about the future, was one that was eerily on target: Heinlein's (remember he's writing this in 1957) relating of the Stock Market Panic of 1987...which actually happened! Another thing that made an impact on me was that the author, himself of no religious persuasion, seemed to be acknowledging the presence of a guiding intelligent force in the universe, one that enabled the time-travelling protagonist to avoid committing paradoxes by altering outcomes ever-so-slightly. I enjoyed this book, but in all honesty prefer some of Heinlein's others...
Friday, October 5, 2018
Quote of the Week...from Neil deGrasse Tyson
Knowing how to think empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
---Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Noted American astrophysicist and popularizer of science Neil deGrasse Tyson, one of my favorite public figures (run for president, Neil!), has a birthday today, turning 60, almost exactly two years younger than me. Whenever he's on as a talk show guest on TV, he brings a sense of decorum and reason to the table...even when the host happens to be an ultra-partisan, embarrassing, and tactless annoyance. As for his above comment, I'm not clear on the "empowers" part, but I know that it's far too common for people to be content with allowing those in the media to spoon-feed them opinions...and then spout them back out almost verbatim to others, often in the form of creepy rants. Or even, in our social media/internet society, bypassing that by simply inserting links to "their" information sources when encountering a differing argument (that's happened to me with comments on this blog). Whenever I encounter someone who talks like a clone copy of some opiniated media figure, I wonder to myself where does this veneer come off and where do individuals like this begin to think for themselves? I've heard just about every sort of opinion and narrative about various topics and issues...somebody who just repeats the same tired old crap isn't going to sway me in the least. But if they instead were to open up a little about themselves and how they came to their way of thinking, along with the values that they prioritize the most highly...well, that's a sign that they do know how to think, as well as effectively communicate. But a lot of us, while real adept on the attack and copying and pasting pithy slogans, are suddenly reticent when it comes to coming clean about ourselves and what motivates us philosophically and politically. I respect and appreciate an expressed opinion...even when I vehemently disagree with it...when the person promoting it lays out his or her thought processes in arriving at it. If I just wanted someone to inject finished viewpoints directly into my consciousness, conspiracy theories and doomsday scenarios included, well...there are plenty of overpaid fools on TV and radio more than willing to oblige me, and I'd be the bigger fool for letting them...
---Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Noted American astrophysicist and popularizer of science Neil deGrasse Tyson, one of my favorite public figures (run for president, Neil!), has a birthday today, turning 60, almost exactly two years younger than me. Whenever he's on as a talk show guest on TV, he brings a sense of decorum and reason to the table...even when the host happens to be an ultra-partisan, embarrassing, and tactless annoyance. As for his above comment, I'm not clear on the "empowers" part, but I know that it's far too common for people to be content with allowing those in the media to spoon-feed them opinions...and then spout them back out almost verbatim to others, often in the form of creepy rants. Or even, in our social media/internet society, bypassing that by simply inserting links to "their" information sources when encountering a differing argument (that's happened to me with comments on this blog). Whenever I encounter someone who talks like a clone copy of some opiniated media figure, I wonder to myself where does this veneer come off and where do individuals like this begin to think for themselves? I've heard just about every sort of opinion and narrative about various topics and issues...somebody who just repeats the same tired old crap isn't going to sway me in the least. But if they instead were to open up a little about themselves and how they came to their way of thinking, along with the values that they prioritize the most highly...well, that's a sign that they do know how to think, as well as effectively communicate. But a lot of us, while real adept on the attack and copying and pasting pithy slogans, are suddenly reticent when it comes to coming clean about ourselves and what motivates us philosophically and politically. I respect and appreciate an expressed opinion...even when I vehemently disagree with it...when the person promoting it lays out his or her thought processes in arriving at it. If I just wanted someone to inject finished viewpoints directly into my consciousness, conspiracy theories and doomsday scenarios included, well...there are plenty of overpaid fools on TV and radio more than willing to oblige me, and I'd be the bigger fool for letting them...
Thursday, October 4, 2018
9/30 Sermon on Miracles, Part 4
At The Family Church here in Gainesville, Florida, senior pastor Philip Griffin continued his examination of seven signs, or miracles, that Jesus performed and which are related in the New Testament's Gospel of John. The specific sign for this day was the feeding of the thousands, described in John 6:1-14, 30-35: click on the passage to read the entire chapter via Bible Gateway. The overriding theme, as Pastor Griffin stated, is that Jesus is the Bread of Life, satisfying the hunger of our souls...
Pastor Griffin broke his message down into four parts: Jesus leads us into a life of compassion, trust, satisfaction, and evangelism. When Jesus was ministering throughout the land, he was exhausted, hungry, and discouraged...he sought solitude to seek and receive solace and strength from his heavenly father. But the crowds, many of whom saw in Jesus a political figure who could overthrow the Romans and reestablish an independent Jewish kingdom, pursued him and his disciples. Jesus's reaction to them was counterintuitive, but in line with God's love for us: he felt and demonstrated compassion toward them, in so doing pointing to us the role that compassion has in ministry and that it is a sign that we are truly following him. With trust, Jesus tested Philip, one of his disciples, to point him to trusting in him and not his own knowledge. No, the numbers did not add up: they had five pieces of bread and two fish, and to feed the five thousand men (and many more women and children who were there) the financial cost would be staggering. But while it is good to be responsible with one's resources, the ultimate authority over them all is God. Our pastor continued, noting that if we put what little we have in God's hands, he will provide abundantly for us: God's provision will never run out and his love will never run dry. But the people wanted a political solution to their physical problems...but as Pastor Philip said, this sign pointed not only to a physical level of hunger, but also a spiritual one. And with evangelism, Philip related a definition that he had heard from a Sri Lankan evangelist: "it is one beggar telling another beggar where to find bread"...in the end we're all beggars and the bread is the Bread of Life: Jesus Christ...
You can watch this message on the church's YouTube video website through the following link: [TFC Videos]. The Family Church, at 2022 SW 122nd Street, holds its weekly services on Sunday morning at 9 and 10:30. Along with the sermon is praise and worship music, prayer, fellowship, and opportunities for learning and discipleship. Free coffee is available in the hospitality room...the series continues this Sunday...
Pastor Griffin broke his message down into four parts: Jesus leads us into a life of compassion, trust, satisfaction, and evangelism. When Jesus was ministering throughout the land, he was exhausted, hungry, and discouraged...he sought solitude to seek and receive solace and strength from his heavenly father. But the crowds, many of whom saw in Jesus a political figure who could overthrow the Romans and reestablish an independent Jewish kingdom, pursued him and his disciples. Jesus's reaction to them was counterintuitive, but in line with God's love for us: he felt and demonstrated compassion toward them, in so doing pointing to us the role that compassion has in ministry and that it is a sign that we are truly following him. With trust, Jesus tested Philip, one of his disciples, to point him to trusting in him and not his own knowledge. No, the numbers did not add up: they had five pieces of bread and two fish, and to feed the five thousand men (and many more women and children who were there) the financial cost would be staggering. But while it is good to be responsible with one's resources, the ultimate authority over them all is God. Our pastor continued, noting that if we put what little we have in God's hands, he will provide abundantly for us: God's provision will never run out and his love will never run dry. But the people wanted a political solution to their physical problems...but as Pastor Philip said, this sign pointed not only to a physical level of hunger, but also a spiritual one. And with evangelism, Philip related a definition that he had heard from a Sri Lankan evangelist: "it is one beggar telling another beggar where to find bread"...in the end we're all beggars and the bread is the Bread of Life: Jesus Christ...
You can watch this message on the church's YouTube video website through the following link: [TFC Videos]. The Family Church, at 2022 SW 122nd Street, holds its weekly services on Sunday morning at 9 and 10:30. Along with the sermon is praise and worship music, prayer, fellowship, and opportunities for learning and discipleship. Free coffee is available in the hospitality room...the series continues this Sunday...
Wednesday, October 3, 2018
Weekly Short Story Review: '39 Sci-Fi, Part 1
Although I'm still devoting Wednesdays to discussing short stories I've read, this week I'm going in a different direction. I own the entire collection, covering the years 1939-63, of the anthology series Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories. I am now going through each book, starting with #1, covering the science fiction stories that editors Isaac Asimov and Martin H. Greenberg deemed the best in short science fiction literature for 1939. Starting it off were three stories...
I, ROBOT...by Eando Binder
The name "I, Robot" has come to be identified either with a questionable movie starring Will Smith or a collection of stories written by Isaac Asimov. The original is a 1939 short story by Eando Binder, the pen name of a two-brothers writing team. It is told from the perspective of the robot, created by a kindly tinkerer/scientist, and delves into emerging self-awareness as well as how sadly human nature will turn anyone appearing "different" and out of the ordinary as being evil monsters. A very endearing but unsettling tale...
THE STRANGE FLIGHT OF RICHARD CLAYTON...by Robert Bloch
Robert Bloch, a name you're probably unfamiliar with, later wrote Psycho, the horror thriller that Alfred Hitchcock turned into a blockbuster movie. In '39 he produced this little story about a man, the title character, who singlehandedly designed and built over a span of years a rocket ship to take him to Mars and back. But as his spaceship takes off, he unexpectedly loses control and contact...fortunately, as he sees it, the controls have already been set to automatic. But in the meantime Richard Clayton is completely cut off from others, even unable to mark the passage of time. The ending reminded me of Carl Sagan's movie Contact...
TROUBLE WITH WATER...by H.L. Gold
This to me was more of a fantasy story than science fiction, especially since one of the characters is a water gnome who swims with his ears! Greenberg, the protagonist, has offended this little man and now must pay the consequences: henceforth water will steer away from him...he no longer can drink it or bathe with it. The comedic implications play out in this funny yarn, but since the human body is about 6o% water with the percentage dramatically rising to 92% with blood, wouldn't Greenberg have imploded in a horrible instant? Well, as I said, Trouble with Water was more fantasy than science fiction...
The best science fiction short stories from 1939 continue next week...
I, ROBOT...by Eando Binder
The name "I, Robot" has come to be identified either with a questionable movie starring Will Smith or a collection of stories written by Isaac Asimov. The original is a 1939 short story by Eando Binder, the pen name of a two-brothers writing team. It is told from the perspective of the robot, created by a kindly tinkerer/scientist, and delves into emerging self-awareness as well as how sadly human nature will turn anyone appearing "different" and out of the ordinary as being evil monsters. A very endearing but unsettling tale...
THE STRANGE FLIGHT OF RICHARD CLAYTON...by Robert Bloch
Robert Bloch, a name you're probably unfamiliar with, later wrote Psycho, the horror thriller that Alfred Hitchcock turned into a blockbuster movie. In '39 he produced this little story about a man, the title character, who singlehandedly designed and built over a span of years a rocket ship to take him to Mars and back. But as his spaceship takes off, he unexpectedly loses control and contact...fortunately, as he sees it, the controls have already been set to automatic. But in the meantime Richard Clayton is completely cut off from others, even unable to mark the passage of time. The ending reminded me of Carl Sagan's movie Contact...
TROUBLE WITH WATER...by H.L. Gold
This to me was more of a fantasy story than science fiction, especially since one of the characters is a water gnome who swims with his ears! Greenberg, the protagonist, has offended this little man and now must pay the consequences: henceforth water will steer away from him...he no longer can drink it or bathe with it. The comedic implications play out in this funny yarn, but since the human body is about 6o% water with the percentage dramatically rising to 92% with blood, wouldn't Greenberg have imploded in a horrible instant? Well, as I said, Trouble with Water was more fantasy than science fiction...
The best science fiction short stories from 1939 continue next week...
Tuesday, October 2, 2018
Tuesday's List: Historic Landmark US Supreme Court Decisions
Depending on what your area of interest is, what constitutes a "landmark" United State Supreme Court decision will vary from person to person. On the below list, I'm sure I left out some important cases...I took a course on the history of Court rulings back in 2002 at the University of Florida. My two sources for this list, which I merged, rearranged, and modified, were USA Today and Constitution Facts, which you can access buy clicking on their names. I wanted to demonstrate by presenting my list how divided the U.S. Supreme Court has become in recent decades: 10 out of 11 of the most recent listed decisions have been by single-vote 5-4 majorities (the exception being 6-3), while out of the first 25 decisions below, only 5 were decided that narrowly. It's true: once a deliberative body of consensus-building and a push for unity, the Court has deteriorated into two camps of opposing ideologies...which accounts for the fury (or with the recent case of Merrick Garland, stonewalling) unleashed on nominees nowadays whenever that precarious"balance" seems threatened for one "side" or the other...
1803 MARBURY v. MADISON (4-0)
1809 MCCULLOCH v. MARYLAND (7-0)
1824 GIBBONS v. OGDEN (7-0)
1837 CHARLES RIVER BRIDGE v. WARREN BRIDGE (5-2)
1857 DRED SCOTT v. SANDFORD (7-2)
1877 MUNN v. ILLINOIS (7-2)
1896 PLESSY v. FERGUSON (7-1)
1905 LOCHNER v. NEW YORK (5-4)
1918 SCHENCK v. UNITED STATES (9-0)
1931 NEAR v. MINNESOTA (5-4)
1937 WEST COAST HOTEL v. PARRISH (5-4)
1944 KOREMATSU v. UNITED STATES (6-3)
1954 BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION (9-0)
1961 MAPP v. OHIO (6-3)
1962 BAKER v. CARR (6-2)
1962 ENGEL v. VITALE (6-1)
1963 GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT (9-0)
1964 NEW YORK TIMES v. SULLIVAN (9-0)
1965 GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT (7-2)
1966 MIRANDA v. ARIZONA (5-4)
1967 LOVING v. VIRGINIA (9-0)
1969 TINKER v. DES MOINES (7-2)
1973 SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. RODRIGUEZ (5-4)
1973 ROE v. WADE (7-2)
1974 UNITED STATES v. NIXON (8-0)
1978 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA v. BAKKE (5-4)
1989 TEXAS v. JOHNSON (5-4)
1990 CRUZAN v. MISSOURI DEPT. OF HEALTH (5-4)
2000 BUSH v. GORE (5-4)
2003 LAWRENCE v. TEXAS (6-3)
2008 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER (5-4)
2010 CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION (5-4)
2012 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS v. SEBELIUS (5-4)
2013 SHLEBY COUNTY v. HOLDER (5-4)
2013 UNITED STATES v. WINDSOR (5-4)
2014 OBERGEFELL v. HODGES (5-4)
1803 MARBURY v. MADISON (4-0)
1809 MCCULLOCH v. MARYLAND (7-0)
1824 GIBBONS v. OGDEN (7-0)
1837 CHARLES RIVER BRIDGE v. WARREN BRIDGE (5-2)
1857 DRED SCOTT v. SANDFORD (7-2)
1877 MUNN v. ILLINOIS (7-2)
1896 PLESSY v. FERGUSON (7-1)
1905 LOCHNER v. NEW YORK (5-4)
1918 SCHENCK v. UNITED STATES (9-0)
1931 NEAR v. MINNESOTA (5-4)
1937 WEST COAST HOTEL v. PARRISH (5-4)
1944 KOREMATSU v. UNITED STATES (6-3)
1954 BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION (9-0)
1961 MAPP v. OHIO (6-3)
1962 BAKER v. CARR (6-2)
1962 ENGEL v. VITALE (6-1)
1963 GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT (9-0)
1964 NEW YORK TIMES v. SULLIVAN (9-0)
1965 GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT (7-2)
1966 MIRANDA v. ARIZONA (5-4)
1967 LOVING v. VIRGINIA (9-0)
1969 TINKER v. DES MOINES (7-2)
1973 SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. RODRIGUEZ (5-4)
1973 ROE v. WADE (7-2)
1974 UNITED STATES v. NIXON (8-0)
1978 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA v. BAKKE (5-4)
1989 TEXAS v. JOHNSON (5-4)
1990 CRUZAN v. MISSOURI DEPT. OF HEALTH (5-4)
2000 BUSH v. GORE (5-4)
2003 LAWRENCE v. TEXAS (6-3)
2008 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER (5-4)
2010 CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION (5-4)
2012 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS v. SEBELIUS (5-4)
2013 SHLEBY COUNTY v. HOLDER (5-4)
2013 UNITED STATES v. WINDSOR (5-4)
2014 OBERGEFELL v. HODGES (5-4)
Monday, October 1, 2018
Just Finished Reading The Sun Also Rises by Ernest Hemingway
Ernest Hemingway (1899-1961) was one of those authors against whom I used to feel an unreasonable kind of bias, almost exclusively as a negative reaction to the kind of "instruction" I received throughout my high school English class years. I do remember reading The Old Man and the Sea in 1971 as a reading assignment in the ninth grade and thought then that it was okay, but didn't get around to reading any of his other more famous works until recent years, when I went through For Whom the Bell Tolls (my favorite Hemingway novel) and A Farewell to Arms. Well, I finally got around to reading one of his earlier books, The Sun Also Rises from 1926. As for my following reaction, English teachers are welcome to read it but so are truck drivers, construction workers, policemen, and anyone else: their opinions are equally valid and authoritiative, as far as I'm concerned...
During the 1920s there was a very large American and British expatriate community residing in Paris, France, partially due to the more liberal social environment there, partially due to many having fallen in love with the place from their World War I experiences, and partially due to the fact that, while in the States Prohibition was a Constitutionally-mandated law at the time, overseas the American ex-pats could openly drink to their hearts' content. Ernest Hemingway was one of these folks and decided to write a story that reflected the expatriate lifestyle, in the process reportedly drawing upon his own experiences and those of friends and acquaintances. The result, The Sun Also Rises, is something that, were it to appear in some form of media today, would probably most closely resemble a TV reality show like Jersey Shore, The Shahs of Sunset, or the numerous Housewives series. I say that because Hemingway's characters are continually going around from café to restaurant to hotel while getting themselves "tight", i.e. drunk. Their lives seem to be in a state of stagnation, just drifting from one thing to the next. At the same time these people (first person narrator/protagonist Jake Barnes, his "love" Brett Ashley, Mike Campbell, Bill Gorton, and Robert Cohn as the main characters) practice a kind of social insulation separating themselves from the people they encounter. I'll have to admit that some of these characters remind me in various ways of people I've personally known over the years, especially that tendency to insulate themselves as a "group apart"...or as Hemingway referred to it, the "gang". They hobnob around in Paris, go fishing in French Basque country, and end up watching the bullfights in Pamplona, Spain. If you're looking for anything substantial happening in this story, forget it: more than anything this is a character study as well as a detailed description of 20s' Paris and the sport/tradition of bullfighting. Hemingway's writing style was stark and plain, using short sentences and making dialogue the preeminent feature. I can't say that I disliked The Sun Also Rises once I felt that I understood where the author was going with it...I'm just not sure that he would have appreciated the generally unfavorable reactions that I felt about his characters and their lifestyles, which I suspect he might have been promoting and defending...
During the 1920s there was a very large American and British expatriate community residing in Paris, France, partially due to the more liberal social environment there, partially due to many having fallen in love with the place from their World War I experiences, and partially due to the fact that, while in the States Prohibition was a Constitutionally-mandated law at the time, overseas the American ex-pats could openly drink to their hearts' content. Ernest Hemingway was one of these folks and decided to write a story that reflected the expatriate lifestyle, in the process reportedly drawing upon his own experiences and those of friends and acquaintances. The result, The Sun Also Rises, is something that, were it to appear in some form of media today, would probably most closely resemble a TV reality show like Jersey Shore, The Shahs of Sunset, or the numerous Housewives series. I say that because Hemingway's characters are continually going around from café to restaurant to hotel while getting themselves "tight", i.e. drunk. Their lives seem to be in a state of stagnation, just drifting from one thing to the next. At the same time these people (first person narrator/protagonist Jake Barnes, his "love" Brett Ashley, Mike Campbell, Bill Gorton, and Robert Cohn as the main characters) practice a kind of social insulation separating themselves from the people they encounter. I'll have to admit that some of these characters remind me in various ways of people I've personally known over the years, especially that tendency to insulate themselves as a "group apart"...or as Hemingway referred to it, the "gang". They hobnob around in Paris, go fishing in French Basque country, and end up watching the bullfights in Pamplona, Spain. If you're looking for anything substantial happening in this story, forget it: more than anything this is a character study as well as a detailed description of 20s' Paris and the sport/tradition of bullfighting. Hemingway's writing style was stark and plain, using short sentences and making dialogue the preeminent feature. I can't say that I disliked The Sun Also Rises once I felt that I understood where the author was going with it...I'm just not sure that he would have appreciated the generally unfavorable reactions that I felt about his characters and their lifestyles, which I suspect he might have been promoting and defending...
Sunday, September 30, 2018
My September 2018 Running Report
In September I ran for a total of 66 miles...not much. I did extend my longest single run to 4.6 miles and ran on every day of the month. Two factors interfering with my running were the extremely hot and humid weather we've been experiencing all month here in northern Florida and my own situation at work: lots and lots of overtime, which often impinged on the time I would normally spend late in the morning on runs. I'm looking forward to cooler conditions in October, but the overtime...well, it's sporadic. I'm still thinking of running a half-marathon in November...now I've heard that Gainesville is holding two of them, on consecutive weekends. Also, there is a new free weekly 5K race that takes place Saturday mornings at Gainesville's Depot Park: I need to preregister online for it. Yesterday Melissa went with me to the Fit2Run store at the Oak's Mall where the manager tested my running to fit it to appropriate shoes. She also gave me some needed advice on avoiding plantar fasciitis in the future. So now I'm training with new shoes...next month should be an adventure as I try to ratchet up my running distance...
Saturday, September 29, 2018
Just Finished Reading The Blinding Knife by Brent Weeks
The Blinding Knife, by Brent Weeks, is the second book in his ongoing Lightbringer fantasy series. On this imaginary world, colors and certain people's abilities to turn them into a tangible substance called "luxin" determine the social and political order and power structure. The author went into agonizing detail explaining it all in the first book...he was more merciful in this one, thankfully. Kip Guile is a boy with special abilities concerning all the known colors, but neither he nor others know the full extent of his powers. His presumed father, Gavin Guile (or is it his brother Dazen) is the Prism, charged with the burdensome task of ensuring that all the colors of the world remain in a state of balance...otherwise the color gods will rise up and divide and plunge the world into chaos and destruction. But Gavin has been stabbed with a special white dagger and so has begun to lose his ability to control colors...yes, it all sounds a bit silly the way I describe it, doesn't it? In the meantime his new nemesis, Lord Omnichrome, is leading a war of rebellion against the Chromeria, Gavin's group. There are lots of other characters and subplots involved here, but I'm just not going to list them. One reason is that describing books within series like this can inadvertently involve giving away some of what happened in previous volumes and I don't want to be a plot spoiler. I will say this much: the various characters, many in dire opposition to each other, often are related...sometimes closely...with some of them ignorant of this. It's all very convoluted on many levels, something I find a bit distasteful. I understand that the author intends to extend this Lightbringer series to several books, making me wonder why I started reading it in the first place. After all, I really don't want to be in my late seventies or early eighties, wondering when Book Number Nine or Ten is going to come out. I've read long fantasy series, notably Robert Jordan's The Wheel of Time and Terry Goodkind's The Sword of Truth. But I began these projects knowing that the authors had already completed writing them and that I could read them in rapid succession...
Friday, September 28, 2018
Quote of the Week...from J.D. Salinger
I'll read my books and I'll drink coffee and I'll listen to music and I'll bolt the door.
---J.D. Salinger
J.D. Salinger is the author of the great 1951 literary anthem to teenage angst and alienation, The Catcher in the Rye. I can identify with his above quote in that I know the things I want to do and it immensely frustrates me when the world around me seems to conspire to prevent me from doing them. I also like books, coffee, music...and bolted doors: I'm about to start Robert Heinlein's 1957 science fiction novel The Door into Summer, I have a cup of hazelnut-flavored coffee in front of me, I'm a fan of classical music, classic rock, alternative/indie rock, and heavy metal...and my doors are bolted and locked. My personality leads me to be a recluse, and I have to fight each day to resist the temptation to completely shut out the world from my life...with mixed results, some days being better than others. But I'm blessed to have a wonderful wife who helps keep me connected, as well as a pretty doggone good job to go to with some fantastic people. I also try to get outside and run...not just for exercise or personal achievement, but also to be a part of that world that I'm inclined to shun. This blog has been very helpful to me as well, establishing a mostly daily habit of writing and engaging others with my thoughts on a variety of topics. And sometimes (not tonight) I'll deliberately go out to a Starbucks to write or study, just to be in a social setting...plus I like their coffee, of course. It's good to get out among others...and it's also good to be at home around oneself...
---J.D. Salinger
J.D. Salinger is the author of the great 1951 literary anthem to teenage angst and alienation, The Catcher in the Rye. I can identify with his above quote in that I know the things I want to do and it immensely frustrates me when the world around me seems to conspire to prevent me from doing them. I also like books, coffee, music...and bolted doors: I'm about to start Robert Heinlein's 1957 science fiction novel The Door into Summer, I have a cup of hazelnut-flavored coffee in front of me, I'm a fan of classical music, classic rock, alternative/indie rock, and heavy metal...and my doors are bolted and locked. My personality leads me to be a recluse, and I have to fight each day to resist the temptation to completely shut out the world from my life...with mixed results, some days being better than others. But I'm blessed to have a wonderful wife who helps keep me connected, as well as a pretty doggone good job to go to with some fantastic people. I also try to get outside and run...not just for exercise or personal achievement, but also to be a part of that world that I'm inclined to shun. This blog has been very helpful to me as well, establishing a mostly daily habit of writing and engaging others with my thoughts on a variety of topics. And sometimes (not tonight) I'll deliberately go out to a Starbucks to write or study, just to be in a social setting...plus I like their coffee, of course. It's good to get out among others...and it's also good to be at home around oneself...
Thursday, September 27, 2018
9/23 Sermon on Miracles, Part 3
At The Family Church here in Gainesville, senior pastor Philip Griffin continued his series on the seven signs, or miracles, that Jesus gave in the Bible's New Testament book of John. The passage of focus, concerning the healing at the pool, is John 5:1-18...click on it to read it via Bible Gateway. Pastor Philip's message contained two important areas: how we can get ourselves "unstuck" and healed physically, emotionally, relationally, and spiritually...and the true meaning of the Sabbath. To this effect he posed three questions: do I want to get well, am I receiving everything God wants to give me, and do I find in God my true Sabbath rest? Philip noted that the man at the pool had identified himself with his illness and the sick people at the pool. He had a misplaced hope that an angel would stir up the healing waters for him and, instead of trusting in Jesus as his Lord, gave him instructions to help him into the pool. None of these false notions helped this man...only through the love and power of Jesus did he get physically healed. Yet the man did not allow himself spiritual healing, for he and others turned on Jesus for this healing on a Sabbath day...our pastor wondered how people could be so legalistic to concentrate on that point after someone stricken for nearly forty years was suddenly, wonderfully healed of his affliction. But the true Sabbath, as Pastor Philip concluded, is based on God's work in the creation...he did not rest on the seventh day because he was tired or the "rules" mandated it, but rather because his work was done. It's because, he said, of Jesus's work that we can rest from our work. We find our Sabbath rest in Jesus, not in ourselves. At the end of this message, Philip read James 5:14-16, which is about prayer within the church body, and invited anyone from the congregation with a need for healing to come forward for prayer with church elders and pastors...
This sermon is available for you to watch through the church's YouTube video website...click to the following link: [TFC Videos]. The Family Church is located at 2022 SW 122nd Street and holds its Sunday morning services at 9 and 10:30. There's the weekly message, praise and worship music, prayer, great fellowship, and all sorts of group and learning activities to participate in. And the hospitality room features free coffee and treats before and between services, always a destination for me when I arrive. Looking forward to this Sunday at the church...
This sermon is available for you to watch through the church's YouTube video website...click to the following link: [TFC Videos]. The Family Church is located at 2022 SW 122nd Street and holds its Sunday morning services at 9 and 10:30. There's the weekly message, praise and worship music, prayer, great fellowship, and all sorts of group and learning activities to participate in. And the hospitality room features free coffee and treats before and between services, always a destination for me when I arrive. Looking forward to this Sunday at the church...
Wednesday, September 26, 2018
Weekly Short Story: The Monkey's Paw by W.W. Jacobs
The 1902 short story The Monkey's Paw, by W.W. Jacobs, continued the fictional tradition that it's possible to get three wishes by possessing a special bottle or object...and how those wishes almost inevitably backfire. Mr. and Mrs. White live in a remote, boggy area with their farm and their son Herbert. A retired military man, Sergeant-Major Morris, is paying visit to their home one night after making Mr. White's acquaintance a few days before. The father directs the conversation to Morris's monkey paw, which the latter claims grants three wishes to three different people: he warns the family that a holy man had put a spell on it to show that fate ruled over desire. But he gives the monkey's paw to Mr. White, and the wishes ensue...along with their unintended consequences...
Most of us know the story of Aladdin, his magic lamp, and the three wishes. And there have been variations on this theme...on old Twilight Zone episode likewise featured a genie who granted wishes to an impoverished shopkeeper with dire results. The moral to these tales is almost always that there is no magical shortcut to the fulfillment of people's dreams...and bad things happen to people to try to bypass the natural order of things. The Monkey's Paw, which could be considered as a horror story, certainly fits this pattern. I've read it a number of times and you can as well by clicking on the following link to read it in PDF: [The Monkey's Paw]. After reading it, I wondered whether Stephen King might have gotten some of his inspiration for Pet Sematary here...after reading both, you'll know what I'm talking about. In any event, this story of W.W. Jacobs is a classic and worth reading, although some sensitive folks might suffer nightmares afterwards...
Most of us know the story of Aladdin, his magic lamp, and the three wishes. And there have been variations on this theme...on old Twilight Zone episode likewise featured a genie who granted wishes to an impoverished shopkeeper with dire results. The moral to these tales is almost always that there is no magical shortcut to the fulfillment of people's dreams...and bad things happen to people to try to bypass the natural order of things. The Monkey's Paw, which could be considered as a horror story, certainly fits this pattern. I've read it a number of times and you can as well by clicking on the following link to read it in PDF: [The Monkey's Paw]. After reading it, I wondered whether Stephen King might have gotten some of his inspiration for Pet Sematary here...after reading both, you'll know what I'm talking about. In any event, this story of W.W. Jacobs is a classic and worth reading, although some sensitive folks might suffer nightmares afterwards...
Tuesday, September 25, 2018
Tuesday's List: 1991 Senate Confirmation Vote for Clarence Thomas
As the confirmation process for United State Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sadly continues down the path of examining his youth in light of allegations of sexual misconduct...with a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing scheduled for Thursday...I thought it might be interesting to go back in time to 1991 when Republican president George H.W. Bush's nominee, Clarence Thomas, after Anita Hill's accusations against him, was narrowly confirmed by the Senate body, 52-48. At that time the Democrats controlled the Senate, 57-43. It was a very different era, politically, with 11 Democrats crossing over to vote for Thomas's confirmation and 2 Republicans voting in opposition...imagine that sort of thing happening in today's extremely partisan setting...
Here are the senators crossing over in that vote:
DEMOCRATS VOTING FOR THOMAS
RICHARD SHELBY (Alabama)...later joined Republican Party
DENNIS DECONCINI (Arizona)
SAM NUNN (Georgia)
WYCHE FOWLER (Georgia)
ALAN DIXON (Illinois)
J. BENNETT JOHNSTON (Louisiana)
JOHN BREAUX (Louisiana)
JAMES EXON (Nevada)
DAVID BOREN (Oklahoma)
ERNEST HOLLINGS (South Carolina)
CHUCK ROBB (Virginia)
REPUBLICANS VOTING AGAINST THOMAS
BOB PACKWOOD (Oregon)
JIM JEFFORDS (Vermont)
Looking at the above list of Democrats voting for Clarence Thomas's confirmation, you'll note that six of the eleven senators are from Deep South states. Only Shelby was a staunch conservative and he himself switched parties later in the decade. The other five were moderate Democrats...back then southern voters weren't anywhere nearly as skewed to the political right as they now are...
By the way, back then in 1991 there were some familiar, much younger faces in the Senate for that vote: here's a list that includes currently sitting senators, two former vice-presidents, three presidential general election candidates, and a vice-presidential candidate..all of them voted along their party's line:
JOHN MCCAIN (Arizona)
JOE BIDEN (Delaware)
JOE LIEBERMANN (Connecticut)
CHUCK GRASSLEY (Iowa)
BOB DOLE (Kansas)
MITCH MCCONNELL (Kentucky)
JOHN KERRY (Massachusetts)
AL GORE (Tennessee)
ORRIN HATCH (Utah)
PATRICK LEAHY (Vermont)
I composed the above lists by referencing Wikipedia's page about Clarence Thomas. In looking at what's going on regarding Brett Kavanaugh, I have to sit back and allow the upcoming events to play themselves out before I can form a reasonable opinion. Of course, now there seem to be two other people in his past who might offer damaging testimony, although I wander whether Grassley, McConnell, and Company won't just quickly push for a final vote after Thursday's hearing...
Here are the senators crossing over in that vote:
DEMOCRATS VOTING FOR THOMAS
RICHARD SHELBY (Alabama)...later joined Republican Party
DENNIS DECONCINI (Arizona)
SAM NUNN (Georgia)
WYCHE FOWLER (Georgia)
ALAN DIXON (Illinois)
J. BENNETT JOHNSTON (Louisiana)
JOHN BREAUX (Louisiana)
JAMES EXON (Nevada)
DAVID BOREN (Oklahoma)
ERNEST HOLLINGS (South Carolina)
CHUCK ROBB (Virginia)
REPUBLICANS VOTING AGAINST THOMAS
BOB PACKWOOD (Oregon)
JIM JEFFORDS (Vermont)
Looking at the above list of Democrats voting for Clarence Thomas's confirmation, you'll note that six of the eleven senators are from Deep South states. Only Shelby was a staunch conservative and he himself switched parties later in the decade. The other five were moderate Democrats...back then southern voters weren't anywhere nearly as skewed to the political right as they now are...
By the way, back then in 1991 there were some familiar, much younger faces in the Senate for that vote: here's a list that includes currently sitting senators, two former vice-presidents, three presidential general election candidates, and a vice-presidential candidate..all of them voted along their party's line:
JOHN MCCAIN (Arizona)
JOE BIDEN (Delaware)
JOE LIEBERMANN (Connecticut)
CHUCK GRASSLEY (Iowa)
BOB DOLE (Kansas)
MITCH MCCONNELL (Kentucky)
JOHN KERRY (Massachusetts)
AL GORE (Tennessee)
ORRIN HATCH (Utah)
PATRICK LEAHY (Vermont)
I composed the above lists by referencing Wikipedia's page about Clarence Thomas. In looking at what's going on regarding Brett Kavanaugh, I have to sit back and allow the upcoming events to play themselves out before I can form a reasonable opinion. Of course, now there seem to be two other people in his past who might offer damaging testimony, although I wander whether Grassley, McConnell, and Company won't just quickly push for a final vote after Thursday's hearing...
Monday, September 24, 2018
Just Finished Reading We Are Not Ourselves by Matthew Thomas
Stephen King is one of the people I follow on Twitter. Not that I expect anything of special literary value from his often overtly political posts, but I like to keep up with what's on his mind. From time to time he recommends a book he's just read...I read Garth Risk Hallberg's novel City on Fire after reading such a Tweet. The other day he promoted another one, Matthew Thomas's 2014 debut novel We Are Not Ourselves...and I promptly checked it out. Set primarily in New York City, the author's home town, it is a fictional voyage through the life of Eileen Tumulty/Leary from her childhood with her Irish parents into adulthood and her marriage to Ed Leary, a scientist whose values on materialism sharply clash with her longing to become more high society. A lot of stories I've read try to make the protagonist into a character of virtuosity: one thing I liked a lot about We Are Not Ourselves is the way that the author, while focusing on Eileen's point of view, revealed many flaws in her personality and how her behavior often aggravated relational problems she had with others, most particularly her husband and son. Ultimately, though, what won this novel over for me was the way it depicted the debilitating and fatal Alzheimer's Disease, from the initial stages of divergent behavior with its accompanying denials and rationalizing, to the final stage of complete incapacity...how sad. This was a difficult book to get through, but not for any fault of Matthew Thomas and his adroit writing. He plunged head first into real, often very unlikeable characters as well as dealing with a topic that for many has eclipsed their lives, if not as Alzheimer's patients than as their caretakers...along with a stinging indictment of the American health care system that, even in the era of Obamacare, forces families into bankrupt conditions just to obtain needed government assistance...
If you want to read a story about people who are "real", warts and all, and don't expect the author to sugarcoat your reading experience, then you just might also like We Are Not Ourselves. As far as I'm concerned, Stephen King is "two for two" with his book recommendations...
If you want to read a story about people who are "real", warts and all, and don't expect the author to sugarcoat your reading experience, then you just might also like We Are Not Ourselves. As far as I'm concerned, Stephen King is "two for two" with his book recommendations...
Sunday, September 23, 2018
Proud of Gators' Play Against Tennessee Yesterday
Back in the middle of their football season in 2008, the University of Florida football team...anticipating an undefeated season...played Mississippi at home, losing to them 31-30. It was a shocking wake-up call to this team, which had become overconfident and cocky...they didn't lose again that year, eventually taking down Oklahoma in the national championship game. For several reasons I wouldn't place this year's squad on a par with that one, but a couple of weeks ago Kentucky similarly shocked them into somber self-assessment: the Wildcats caught Florida sluggish and flatfooted on the way to a 27-16 upset on the Gators' home turf. Since then first year head coach Dan Mullen has lit a fire under this team, and you can see the results by the relentless energy and pursuit they put on the field, especially on the defensive side. Yesterday Florida went to Knoxville as underdogs to play Tennessee and whipped their rivals 47-21, scoring 24 of their points off Volunteer turnovers and preventing a Tennessee touchdown from another...that's a 31 point differential from an aggressive defense and an opportunistic offense...way to go! As for Kentucky, Florida's earlier loss to them doesn't look quite as bad as before: 14th ranked Mississippi State just fell to them 28-7...
I don't know how many games Florida will win this year, but if Mullen can keep this team focused, intense, and hungry for victory against quality opponents...now that they have a taste of what it's like...I feel confident that they will be able to stand on the same field with any team, including LSU and Georgia, and put on a good, respectable show. Which is all I'm asking from them...
I don't know how many games Florida will win this year, but if Mullen can keep this team focused, intense, and hungry for victory against quality opponents...now that they have a taste of what it's like...I feel confident that they will be able to stand on the same field with any team, including LSU and Georgia, and put on a good, respectable show. Which is all I'm asking from them...
Saturday, September 22, 2018
Just Finished Reading Joe Abercrombie's Before They Are Hanged
I am currently juggling three fantasy fiction series with my reading: Brandon Sanderson's Stormlight Archive (I've just quickly reread the first two books in anticipation of starting the third), Lightbringer by Brent Weeks (about to start book two), and this one: Joe Abercrombie's First Law trilogy. I was fortunate in that my son Will, an avid reader, already had the first two volumes...including Before They Are Hanged, which I just finished reading. Of the different series, I clearly prefer Abercrombie's because he keeps the magic uncluttered from excessive detail...very refreshing!
In the world of The First Law, we see the central kingdom, called The Union, threatened in war by different forces, one from the north (the Northmen) and one from the south (the Gurkhuls). Part of the troubles arise from an ancient feud taking place between the order of the Magi (near-immortal wizards) that is playing itself out. There are three separate narratives going on throughout this second installment: Collem West, a brave and loyal officer for the Union, is in the north with his forces fighting Bethod's Northmen (resembling the Vikings) in concert with a band of renegade northern fighters, the Dogman being the main character among them. In the south, the brutal Gurkish Empire is laying siege to the Union city of Dagoska, and Inquisitor Glokta (an exquisitely cynical, insightful, and pragmatic protagonist) has been sent to head the resistance and sort out corruption and treason. And in the west, a motley band is venturing to retrieve what Magi Bayaz calls "the Seed" that will purportedly aid him in saving the world and settling his ages-old scores...with him on the trek are Northman Logen "Ninefingers", Ferro (a violent, vengeful woman from the south), Jezal (a master fencer with no combat experience), and a couple of minor characters (at least right now they're minor). The book toggles between these three narratives, all of which are very interesting...I grew to care about these characters and how they might survive (or not survive) their many ordeals. As expected, the end of this book left me hanging, eagerly ready to start the last one, titled Last Argument of Kings. One problem: Will didn't seem to leave this one behind...or at least I haven't yet found it...so I'll have to check it out from the library. Not a problem: I've got plenty of other stuff to read in the meantime...
In the world of The First Law, we see the central kingdom, called The Union, threatened in war by different forces, one from the north (the Northmen) and one from the south (the Gurkhuls). Part of the troubles arise from an ancient feud taking place between the order of the Magi (near-immortal wizards) that is playing itself out. There are three separate narratives going on throughout this second installment: Collem West, a brave and loyal officer for the Union, is in the north with his forces fighting Bethod's Northmen (resembling the Vikings) in concert with a band of renegade northern fighters, the Dogman being the main character among them. In the south, the brutal Gurkish Empire is laying siege to the Union city of Dagoska, and Inquisitor Glokta (an exquisitely cynical, insightful, and pragmatic protagonist) has been sent to head the resistance and sort out corruption and treason. And in the west, a motley band is venturing to retrieve what Magi Bayaz calls "the Seed" that will purportedly aid him in saving the world and settling his ages-old scores...with him on the trek are Northman Logen "Ninefingers", Ferro (a violent, vengeful woman from the south), Jezal (a master fencer with no combat experience), and a couple of minor characters (at least right now they're minor). The book toggles between these three narratives, all of which are very interesting...I grew to care about these characters and how they might survive (or not survive) their many ordeals. As expected, the end of this book left me hanging, eagerly ready to start the last one, titled Last Argument of Kings. One problem: Will didn't seem to leave this one behind...or at least I haven't yet found it...so I'll have to check it out from the library. Not a problem: I've got plenty of other stuff to read in the meantime...
Friday, September 21, 2018
Quote of the Week...from Stephen King
I was "in" enough to get along with people. I was never socially inarticulate. Not a loner. And that saved my life, saved my sanity. That and the writing. But to this day I distrust anybody who thought school was a good time. Anybody. ---Stephen King.
Stephen King, my all-time favorite author, turned 71 today and I thought I might take advantage of the occasion by quoting him on something. The above comment of his made an impression on me in a couple of ways...my complete divergence from his experiences in school and my complete agreement with his assessment of our respective experiences. Stephen, you can trust me: school for me was anything but a good time...but I wasn't "in" enough to get along with people, I was always socially inarticulate, and was one of the biggest loners around. But the fact that I am wired a bit differently and see things from another perspective got me through those horrific years, having long given up on ever getting any positive social reinforcement from others be they classmates or teachers...and I didn't write back then, either. And, like this wonderful author whose birthday I'm celebrating, I did not believe that I was the only one suffering through school, either: I saw misery, humiliation, fear, and loneliness pervade the souls of so many of my fellow students...it's hard to come out of those years without having a cynical worldview as well as a sad kind of empathy for broken people. Yet, as ol' Johnny Cougar once sang, life goes on, long after the thrill of living has gone...we need to now take our lives one day at a time and live in the present. I've seen a few South Park episodes and tend to identify with the Goth Kids whenever they're featured...to me nothing would have been more appealing back then then to stay up late at night at some all-night diner with my fellow malcontents, swilling black coffee and railing about how awful everything is. Yes, that's one group...had it existed when I was going to school...that I just might have fit in with...
Stephen King, my all-time favorite author, turned 71 today and I thought I might take advantage of the occasion by quoting him on something. The above comment of his made an impression on me in a couple of ways...my complete divergence from his experiences in school and my complete agreement with his assessment of our respective experiences. Stephen, you can trust me: school for me was anything but a good time...but I wasn't "in" enough to get along with people, I was always socially inarticulate, and was one of the biggest loners around. But the fact that I am wired a bit differently and see things from another perspective got me through those horrific years, having long given up on ever getting any positive social reinforcement from others be they classmates or teachers...and I didn't write back then, either. And, like this wonderful author whose birthday I'm celebrating, I did not believe that I was the only one suffering through school, either: I saw misery, humiliation, fear, and loneliness pervade the souls of so many of my fellow students...it's hard to come out of those years without having a cynical worldview as well as a sad kind of empathy for broken people. Yet, as ol' Johnny Cougar once sang, life goes on, long after the thrill of living has gone...we need to now take our lives one day at a time and live in the present. I've seen a few South Park episodes and tend to identify with the Goth Kids whenever they're featured...to me nothing would have been more appealing back then then to stay up late at night at some all-night diner with my fellow malcontents, swilling black coffee and railing about how awful everything is. Yes, that's one group...had it existed when I was going to school...that I just might have fit in with...
Thursday, September 20, 2018
9/16 Sermon on Miracles, Part 2
At The Family Church here in Gainesville, senior pastor Philip Griffin continued his series discussing seven miracles of Jesus as described in the Bible's New Testament book of John with the second miracle: the healing of the official's son, found in John 4:43-54...click on the passage to read it through Bible Gateway. With this message comes an examination of faith, both by the official in the narrative and how our faith develops...a faith, as Pastor Philip stated, that makes its way into every aspect of our lives. And, he continued, it's not the amount of faith we have that matters, but rather the object of our faith: Jesus...
Philip laid out three stages in the development of faith among believers: first, crisis-based faith, then needs-based faith...and, finally, life-giving faith. Our pastor added to this the four types of healing: physical, emotional, relational, and spiritual...there is a kind of rough correspondence between these and the development of faith. Finally, Pastor Philip brought up the story of a daredevil tightrope walker who would span the falls to the applause of the awestruck spectators. One day he brought out a wheelbarrow and asked the crowd if they believed he could push someone in it on the tightrope across the falls. Everyone yelled that they believed...but then he asked for volunteers! There's a big difference between noncommittal faith on the sidelines and committed faith in the trenches...we need to "get in the wheelbarrow" and trust in Jesus to protect and carry us...
You can watch this sermon on the church's YouTube video website...just click on this link: [TFC Videos]. The Family Church is located at 2022 SW 122nd Street and holds its weekly services Sunday morning at 9 and 10:30, featuring praise and worship music, prayer, fellowship...and, of course, the message. Part three of the ongoing series on miracles is slated for this Sunday...
Philip laid out three stages in the development of faith among believers: first, crisis-based faith, then needs-based faith...and, finally, life-giving faith. Our pastor added to this the four types of healing: physical, emotional, relational, and spiritual...there is a kind of rough correspondence between these and the development of faith. Finally, Pastor Philip brought up the story of a daredevil tightrope walker who would span the falls to the applause of the awestruck spectators. One day he brought out a wheelbarrow and asked the crowd if they believed he could push someone in it on the tightrope across the falls. Everyone yelled that they believed...but then he asked for volunteers! There's a big difference between noncommittal faith on the sidelines and committed faith in the trenches...we need to "get in the wheelbarrow" and trust in Jesus to protect and carry us...
You can watch this sermon on the church's YouTube video website...just click on this link: [TFC Videos]. The Family Church is located at 2022 SW 122nd Street and holds its weekly services Sunday morning at 9 and 10:30, featuring praise and worship music, prayer, fellowship...and, of course, the message. Part three of the ongoing series on miracles is slated for this Sunday...
Wednesday, September 19, 2018
Weekly Short Story: Fatal Error by Fredric Brown
Frederic Brown (1906-72) was one of my all-time favorite short story writers, whose works ranged from science fiction to mystery to social commentary. A few years I purchased From These Ashes (NESFA Press), which is a collection of all of this author's short science fiction. Although technically more a crime story than science fiction, his very short 1961 tale Fatal Error is in it. Fatal Error reminds me of the Peter Falk mystery TV series Columbo, where each week a very intelligent person devises what he or she thinks is a foolproof murder...but of course Columbo always figures it out in the end. There's no Columbo in Brown's story, but the intricate plotting on the part of the protagonist is there. Walter Baxter knows he is the only heir to his rich uncle's fortunes, so he works out a plan to kill him while making it look like the unfortunate by-product of a burglary. He assiduously goes about implementing his plans, and when it is all over he commends himself on a job well done. Only one problem: he is quickly arrested anyway. What happened? The answer is hilarious, a testament to what happens when someone gets so caught up in details that they lose sight of the big picture. I don't think this story is available on the Internet, but if you can get hold of it I recommend you take the few minutes seconds needed to read it. It's a hoot...
Tuesday, September 18, 2018
Tuesday's List: Old Drive-In Theaters and Dog Tracks in South Florida
When I was growing up in south Florida...specifically Hollywood...during the 1960s and early 70s, there were two prominent features that no longer figure into the equation in today's world: drive-in movies and greyhound racing. When my family went out to see a movie, it was always to the drive-in: we never went to indoor theaters. And although I never wagered at a dog track, my father became quite an enthusiastic, studying the races and visiting the different locations...and he would fill my ears discussing his betting strategies, to my consternation. Still, I have a soft spot in my heart for these old times, and although its probably a good idea to eliminate pari-mutuel dog race betting (Amendment 13 is on the ballot in November to this effect) due to the abuse of the greyhounds involved in it, it's still yet another relic of my youth fading into obscurity. As for drive-ins, though, we had to contend with the heat, humidity, scratchy sound from the speakers, annoying people in other cars, mosquitos, and noisy planes passing overhead...it was great!!! There are movies I sometimes come across that I remember first seeing in a drive-in, films like A Hard Day's Night, The Ipcress File, Modesty Blaise, Psycho, and others. Well, I no longer live in south Florida and both drive-ins and dog racing have largely sunk into the past. Here are a couple of very short lists of the drive-in theaters and dog tracks that made an impact on me during my young years...
DRIVE-IN THEATERS
ARROW DRIVE-IN....North 441, Hollywood...probably went here the most often
GOLDEN GLADES DRIVE-IN...near Palmetto Expressway in Miami Shores, twin screens
HI-WAY DRIVE-IN...US 1 in Dania...I actually worked here at the concessions stand in 1969-70
THUNDERBIRD DRIVE-IN...Sunrise Blvd in Ft. Lauderdale...my dad once was part-time manager of both the HI-WAY and THUNDERBIRD: the latter still exists with 14 screens
DOG TRACKS
MIAMI BEACH KENNEL CLUB...I could be wrong, but I think this closed with the area's renovation, I never went there
FLAGLER KENNEL CLUB...closest to downtown Miami, ran its final race a few months ago
BISCAYNE KENNEL CLUB...in Miami Shores, I went there with my dad a few times, but not to bet
HOLLYWOOD KENNEL CLUB...in Hallandale, I went there a couple of times...
Casinos have taken over organized gambling in south Florida...Flagler and Hollywood dog tracks became only parts of Big Easy Casino and Magic City Casino, respectively. I never did care for gambling on dog races...like my mother, I just enjoyed watching them chase the "bunny" around the track. As for drive-in theaters, I think I've become completely spoiled by the lush comfort nowadays in indoor theaters, with their reclining, cushiony seats and all...
DRIVE-IN THEATERS
ARROW DRIVE-IN....North 441, Hollywood...probably went here the most often
GOLDEN GLADES DRIVE-IN...near Palmetto Expressway in Miami Shores, twin screens
HI-WAY DRIVE-IN...US 1 in Dania...I actually worked here at the concessions stand in 1969-70
THUNDERBIRD DRIVE-IN...Sunrise Blvd in Ft. Lauderdale...my dad once was part-time manager of both the HI-WAY and THUNDERBIRD: the latter still exists with 14 screens
DOG TRACKS
MIAMI BEACH KENNEL CLUB...I could be wrong, but I think this closed with the area's renovation, I never went there
FLAGLER KENNEL CLUB...closest to downtown Miami, ran its final race a few months ago
BISCAYNE KENNEL CLUB...in Miami Shores, I went there with my dad a few times, but not to bet
HOLLYWOOD KENNEL CLUB...in Hallandale, I went there a couple of times...
Casinos have taken over organized gambling in south Florida...Flagler and Hollywood dog tracks became only parts of Big Easy Casino and Magic City Casino, respectively. I never did care for gambling on dog races...like my mother, I just enjoyed watching them chase the "bunny" around the track. As for drive-in theaters, I think I've become completely spoiled by the lush comfort nowadays in indoor theaters, with their reclining, cushiony seats and all...
Monday, September 17, 2018
Kavanaugh's Accuser Comes Out
With the Senate Judiciary Committee vote on Trump's U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh still slated for Thursday (at this writing), a new issue has been brought up. Senator Dianne Feinstein, the ranking Democrat on the committee, three days ago came out with an anonymous accusation against Kavanaugh of a past attempted sexual assault that he was alleged to have committed against a girl while in high school. Feinstein received a lot of criticism for not only having withheld the letter...which she had in possession since July...from the Judiciary Committee, which could have brought up the matter during the hearings, but also for not mentioning it during her own meeting with the nominee when he had earlier visited her in her Senate office. Well, the accuser has come out publicly now, and it looks as if as she will be testifying under oath before the Committee as early as tomorrow about her experience with Kavanaugh. All I know about what supposedly happened is that there was a party at a house back then and Kavanaugh, along with a male accomplice, is alleged to have forced the accuser into a back room before attempting a sexual battery against her. I'm glad this woman decided not to remain anonymous but am concerned about how this will affect her life going forward. I'm hoping that a detailed testimony will direct this nomination process to a decisive vote. If what is being alleged is true, then Kavanaugh would have technically been a minor at the time, but this would not necessarily have exempted him from being charged as an adult. I doubt that any conclusive proof one way or another can be offered...you either believe the accuser or Kavanaugh in the end. What this does, though, is give the three Democratic senators running for reelection in pro-Trump states...Manchin (WV), Donnelly (IN), and Heitkamp (ND)...the political cover needed for "no" votes for final confirmation. And it may (or may not) sway some Republican senators to oppose Kavanaugh as well: Maine's Republican senator Sue Collins last year urged Senate colleague Al Franken to resign over much less serious allegations. If the nomination fails or is withdrawn, though, the Republicans have a problem: the midterm elections are less than two months away and there is a slight chance that the Democrats might wrest away control of the Senate, effective January 5th next year. So with this scenario Trump wouldn't have much time to squeeze in a replacement nominee to his ideological liking. It's all very interesting and I'm going to be watching to see how this all unfolds. I'm compelled at this time to be angry at Feinstein for secretly holding this card against Kavanaugh, for I had come to like and respect him on a number of levels. Oh well, I'm open to changing my mind and will strongly do so if the testimony leads me there...let's see what happens...
Sunday, September 16, 2018
Early Evening Sky Loaded With Planets, Moon
Yesterday evening just after sunset I stepped outside and looked at the southwest sky...it was a celestial treat with planets abounding. Nearing the horizon was very bright Venus while Jupiter, still much brighter than any of the surrounding stars, was a little higher. A little to the left was the moon, approaching its first quarter phase. And over some more, about due south, was the planet Mars, much brighter than it usually is. I've been neglecting sky gazing for quite some time recently...the main reason is that it's been so doggone unpleasant at night during this still-sweltering summer here in northern Florida, combined with awful humidity and constantly pestering mosquitos. Usually in the evening I'm at work, and when I finally do get home my habit has been to get something to eat and watch a little TV. But yesterday I was off, and I didn't stay outside long enough to get consumed by the nasty little bloodsuckers, who seem to be especially plaguing us more than usual this summer...
So at least in the early evening, if the sky is clear, you'll be able to see three of our fellow planets and a pretty bright moon. I have to contend with city lights where I live, so the stars just don't work out here for me. Still, I'll probably be star-gazing more whenever...if ever...the mosquitos kindly pack up and leave us in peace...
So at least in the early evening, if the sky is clear, you'll be able to see three of our fellow planets and a pretty bright moon. I have to contend with city lights where I live, so the stars just don't work out here for me. Still, I'll probably be star-gazing more whenever...if ever...the mosquitos kindly pack up and leave us in peace...
Saturday, September 15, 2018
Just Finished Reading the Litigators by John Grisham
In the middle of a stretch where I've been reading a lot of fantasy literature I decided to try out another one of legal fiction writer John Grisham's books: I settled upon his 2011 The Litigators, and it was a good choice. It's about three lawyers struggling in their own ways to make their profession work for them in Chicago. Oscar Finley and Walter "Wally" Figg are barely competent ambulance chasers, dreaming of the big case that will win them millions and set their financial lives at ease. David Zinc is just one very well-paid staff attorney of many working at a major firm, Rogan Rothberg. Although making money hand over fist, he hates his job and one day finds himself unable to step into the elevator leading to his office. Instead he turns around and goes to a nearby bar, drinking himself silly all day and eventually noticing a Finley & Figg ad on the side of a bus. He visits their office in his drunkenness and offers his services...meanwhile, Wally has discovered what he believes is the goose that laid the golden egg: he will join his pathetic firm with a nationwide class-action lawsuit against Varrick, a pharmaceutical company producing the cholesterol-reducing drug Krayoxx. Krayoxx is suspected in the deaths of many of its users, and the hunt is on to find anyone who has used it recently and passed away. Oscar is skeptical about the case, but his partner is confident that Varrick will settle and not want a full jury trial...but what if they do?
The Litigators, from start to finish, may be John Grisham's funniest book...I'll have to read all of them to render a final "judgment". Oscar and Wally represent a segment of the legal community that just barely rises above malpractice...and sometimes dips down into it, too. Their secretary Rochelle is the one stabilizing character keeping them afloat, but David's entry into the firm will change not only all of their lives, but his own as well as he discovers how he wants to develop and employ his skills as a litigation lawyer. The author examines litigation in both its seedy and honorable aspects, and from the perspectives of both plaintiff and defendant. I loved the characters in it and want a sequel...probably won't happen, though. Yes, this was one of my favorite John Grisham novels: you'll enjoy it!
The Litigators, from start to finish, may be John Grisham's funniest book...I'll have to read all of them to render a final "judgment". Oscar and Wally represent a segment of the legal community that just barely rises above malpractice...and sometimes dips down into it, too. Their secretary Rochelle is the one stabilizing character keeping them afloat, but David's entry into the firm will change not only all of their lives, but his own as well as he discovers how he wants to develop and employ his skills as a litigation lawyer. The author examines litigation in both its seedy and honorable aspects, and from the perspectives of both plaintiff and defendant. I loved the characters in it and want a sequel...probably won't happen, though. Yes, this was one of my favorite John Grisham novels: you'll enjoy it!
Friday, September 14, 2018
Quote of the Week...from Robert Heinlein
The United States has become a place where entertainers and professional athletes are mistaken for people of importance. ---Robert Heinlein.
Robert Heinlein, who died in 1988, was a renowned American science fiction writer, responsible for such works as Stranger in a Strange Land, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, and Starship Troopers...all books that I have read and recommend. It's been thirty years since he left us...his above quote is much more significant and true today than it ever was. When he composed it he was referring to the notion that too many of us hold that our celebrities have some kind of special wisdom...which got them to their level of fame and success in their respective specialties...that they can extend to issues, philosophy, and politics, giving their opinions more weight than those of people who are actually more knowledgeable and skilled in these areas. I have three reactions to this...
First, I'm fine with entertainers and athletes giving their opinions on what's going on around us...they have as much a right to do this as you or I. The problem is how the public at large treat them: instead of learning something new from our celebrities, we tend to use them to prop up our worldviews, not from persuasive argumentation but rather by serving as living banners or symbols supporting our preconceived beliefs. Second, our media with its soundbites and commercial breaks, along with over-politicized late night talk shows, wants limited arguments about issues and, with social media taking off the way it has, embraces overgeneralizing and simplicity over analysis and objectivity: it's easier to take a known name and run with their opinion than come up with a much more obscure, real expert who would more likely than not provide a nuanced and more lengthy response. And third, I have a great problem with the tendency of the last few decades...greatly magnified in the last few years...of the formation of social-political movements, most of them protests in nature, that promote various innately biased narratives labeling in a sweeping manner certain groups of people as "victims" and other groups as villainous '"aggressors". Entertainers and professional athletes seem to be especially attracted to this kind of political correctness and make any legitimate attempt at mitigating the arguments of the "protesters" more difficult...
Yes, I bet Robert Heinlein would have plenty to say about what's going down today...
Robert Heinlein, who died in 1988, was a renowned American science fiction writer, responsible for such works as Stranger in a Strange Land, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, and Starship Troopers...all books that I have read and recommend. It's been thirty years since he left us...his above quote is much more significant and true today than it ever was. When he composed it he was referring to the notion that too many of us hold that our celebrities have some kind of special wisdom...which got them to their level of fame and success in their respective specialties...that they can extend to issues, philosophy, and politics, giving their opinions more weight than those of people who are actually more knowledgeable and skilled in these areas. I have three reactions to this...
First, I'm fine with entertainers and athletes giving their opinions on what's going on around us...they have as much a right to do this as you or I. The problem is how the public at large treat them: instead of learning something new from our celebrities, we tend to use them to prop up our worldviews, not from persuasive argumentation but rather by serving as living banners or symbols supporting our preconceived beliefs. Second, our media with its soundbites and commercial breaks, along with over-politicized late night talk shows, wants limited arguments about issues and, with social media taking off the way it has, embraces overgeneralizing and simplicity over analysis and objectivity: it's easier to take a known name and run with their opinion than come up with a much more obscure, real expert who would more likely than not provide a nuanced and more lengthy response. And third, I have a great problem with the tendency of the last few decades...greatly magnified in the last few years...of the formation of social-political movements, most of them protests in nature, that promote various innately biased narratives labeling in a sweeping manner certain groups of people as "victims" and other groups as villainous '"aggressors". Entertainers and professional athletes seem to be especially attracted to this kind of political correctness and make any legitimate attempt at mitigating the arguments of the "protesters" more difficult...
Yes, I bet Robert Heinlein would have plenty to say about what's going down today...
Thursday, September 13, 2018
9/9 Sermon on Miracles, Part 1
Last Sunday at The Family Church here in Gainesville our senior pastor, Philip Griffin, began a new sermon series about seven miracles of Jesus as they appeared in the Bible's New Testament book of John. The first of these miracles was at the wedding feast, which you can read from John 2:1-11 by clicking on the passage (through Bible Gateway)…
The miracle at the wedding feast in which Jesus turned water into wine, Pastor Philip began, was a sign of revelation, which can be broken down into three parts: his mission, his power, and his glory. In traditional Jewish weddings of that time, the parents of the families involved negotiated a contract through which costs would be paid. Jesus was considering the costs of his own spiritual wedding with his bride, which is the church with his mission entailing dying on a cross, when he was told that they had run out of wine. The atoning power of Jesus, Philip continued, which was represented by the wine, symbolically replaced the water of purification that had preceded it. The incredible amount of wine produced was a demonstration of the abundance of his love and power. This miracle glorified God: it was something magnificent and praiseworthy that draws us into worship and belief. Our pastor concluded by reminding us that there is an eternal void in our hearts that longs for the glory of God and a deep relationship with him...
You can watch this sermon through the church's YouTube video website...click on the following link: [TFC Videos]. The Family Church, at 2022 SW 122nd Street, holds its weekly services on Sunday morning at 9 and 10:30. Along with the excellent and thought-provoking message is wonderful praise and worship music, prayer, and opportunities to join small groups for discipleship and fellowship. There are plenty of friendly people here to get to know, as well as a hospitality room providing free coffee before and between services. The miracles continue this Sunday...
The miracle at the wedding feast in which Jesus turned water into wine, Pastor Philip began, was a sign of revelation, which can be broken down into three parts: his mission, his power, and his glory. In traditional Jewish weddings of that time, the parents of the families involved negotiated a contract through which costs would be paid. Jesus was considering the costs of his own spiritual wedding with his bride, which is the church with his mission entailing dying on a cross, when he was told that they had run out of wine. The atoning power of Jesus, Philip continued, which was represented by the wine, symbolically replaced the water of purification that had preceded it. The incredible amount of wine produced was a demonstration of the abundance of his love and power. This miracle glorified God: it was something magnificent and praiseworthy that draws us into worship and belief. Our pastor concluded by reminding us that there is an eternal void in our hearts that longs for the glory of God and a deep relationship with him...
You can watch this sermon through the church's YouTube video website...click on the following link: [TFC Videos]. The Family Church, at 2022 SW 122nd Street, holds its weekly services on Sunday morning at 9 and 10:30. Along with the excellent and thought-provoking message is wonderful praise and worship music, prayer, and opportunities to join small groups for discipleship and fellowship. There are plenty of friendly people here to get to know, as well as a hospitality room providing free coffee before and between services. The miracles continue this Sunday...
Wednesday, September 12, 2018
Weekly Short Story: The Picture Man by John Dalmas
The Picture Man, by John Dalmas, is the opening story in the anthology Donald A. Wollheim Presents The 1985 Annual World's Best SF. The narrator is a college professor whose wife had earlier left him for another man and who is now adjusting to his empty house. One evening he notices a man...obviously homeless...going through his garbage and invites him in for some food, even letting him clean himself up and giving him some of his own clothes to change into. The man's name is Finnish: Jaakko Savimaki is from a town in Michigan that essentially shut down decades earlier when its mines closed. Jake, for short, is grateful for our narrator's hospitality and wants to return the favor, asking him if he has a Polaroid camera. The good professor then is told to take a snapshot of Jake's head...the resulting picture is of an old house...Jake's old Michigan home. Another picture is snapped and a different scene comes out. It seems that Jake has inadvertently developed the psychic ability of transferring something from his mind to film. The narrator gets hold of some people who study parapsychology and they test Jake, getting even more amazing results. Finally, he is steered toward showing what Soviet spaceships will soon look like...and then the story takes a sharp left turn. To find out what happens, you'll have to read it for yourself: I'm not spoiling the ending...
Written after Stephen King's Firestarter, The Picture Man also addresses an issue I've discussed a number of times over the years on this blog: if someone possesses a paranormal talent, then the last thing they would want to do would be to openly advertise it in the manner that all the fake professional "psychics" around us do. For a truly paranormally-endowed individual would quickly become a target of governments...and not necessarily ours, seen both as a potential asset in covert matters or a dangerous threat. In any case such a person would end up losing their liberty, at the very least. Jake recognizes this in Dalmas's tale and acts accordingly...
Besides the main story line, I felt that The Picture Man had a certain sweetness and optimism to it not only by how the professor treats Jake, but also how others embrace and accept this once forlorn man into their community. And Finnish curiously fits into it all...
Written after Stephen King's Firestarter, The Picture Man also addresses an issue I've discussed a number of times over the years on this blog: if someone possesses a paranormal talent, then the last thing they would want to do would be to openly advertise it in the manner that all the fake professional "psychics" around us do. For a truly paranormally-endowed individual would quickly become a target of governments...and not necessarily ours, seen both as a potential asset in covert matters or a dangerous threat. In any case such a person would end up losing their liberty, at the very least. Jake recognizes this in Dalmas's tale and acts accordingly...
Besides the main story line, I felt that The Picture Man had a certain sweetness and optimism to it not only by how the professor treats Jake, but also how others embrace and accept this once forlorn man into their community. And Finnish curiously fits into it all...
Tuesday, September 11, 2018
On This Tuesday, 9/11
Seventeen years ago on both this date and day Islamic extremist terrorists of Al Qaeda...15 of the 19 involved from Saudi Arabia...hijacked four American passenger jets and crashed them, bringing down the two World Trade Center towers, damaging the Pentagon, and one plane intended for the Capitol or White House taken down into a remote Pennsylvania field when its passengers bravely revolted. The deaths from these attacks totaled about 3,000 with several thousands more injured...a great number of them were first responders at the Towers, killed or injured when they collapsed. Since then the United States has been in a perpetual state of war in Afghanistan, where the then-ruling Taliban had been giving sanctuary and support to Osama Bin-Laden and his organization. As I usually do on this date each successive year, I went through the TV channels looking for shows about this event which should never be forgotten or diminished...I was surprised to see that MSNBC, which had for years been faithfully rebroadcasting the NBC live ongoing account of that day's events, wasn't showing it anymore. There were the events at the Trade Center site with the readings of the names of the dead from 9/11, the news channels were showing recaps of the attacks, and the History and Discovery channels had special 9/11 programming as well. Maybe some of the other channels will devote something to it later, but I'll be at work then. This year it seems to me like the "reading of the names" ceremony is being pushed as the main media remembrance, as opposed to the attacks themselves and the importance for us to remain vigilant and uncompromising in the face of terrorism. I'll never forget 9/11 and get very frustrated when I hear political correctness about the source of most of our terrorism used to confuse people about the ideological background of its perpetrators. And terrorism is still here as much as we might like to pretend that we are insulated from it...the tactics have changed but their violent, delusional hatred hasn't...
Monday, September 10, 2018
Judge Kavanaugh's Senate Hearings and His Expressed Attitude
The Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to replace retiring Anthony Kennedy as the next United States Supreme Court justice took place last week. The proceedings, aired live on C-Span and the major cable news channels, gave the country a chance to see for themselves what kind of person he is. From my point of view, he did quite well, very composed in the face of continually screaming hecklers and some very harsh questioning from the Democrats, most severely by Senator Kamala Harris. We all know that he is conservative, but Kavanaugh himself stated that he would put his own personal views on issues to the side and address how the various cases he is presented with stand up to the law...most importantly, the foundational U.S. Constitution. However, I've heard similar pronouncements from Court nominees in the past: Gorsuch, Kagan, Sotomayor, Alito, and Roberts all would supposedly deal with the law and not allow personal prejudices to influence them. The only problem is that the pattern in any decision that has come down over the past few years with politically partisan implications has seen these justices and the others predictably line up on their different "sides" that they claim don't exist. Kavanaugh said that he would treat the Supreme Court as the "team of nine" and would work hard to create more of a consensus with rulings instead of the sharply divided 5-4 votes that have characterized it in recent years. Well, I'm pretty sure that he will be confirmed...maybe this will be one of those justices in history who will make a positive difference in unifying the nation. I have written before that I like Brett Kavanaugh: unlike with Neil Gorsuch, whose performance at his hearings made me skeptical of his fairmindedness, this nominee far exceeded my expectations...in fact, much better than did the previous ones I've mentioned. I wish him the best, but I'm also hoping against hope that he will truly be the independent justice that he promises to be...wouldn't that be a breath of fresh air for a change...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
