Filtering Out Value from Commentators' Garbage

I have been watching Fox News Channel some of late, but not with any delusional notion of getting anything resembling "fair and balanced" news coverage and analysis, despite that channel's ridiculous claim.  No, I am instead intent on receiving their conservative take on things in their full bias, and not necessarily because I am shifting in my political leanings.  For I am coming to an uncomfortable conclusion about how American society is becoming so polarized between those espousing leftist or rightist leanings that they tend to view the "other side" in terms of being enemies and evil.  I think of lot of this has to do with how people receive the often viciously critical commentary on TV and radio without understanding how to filter out the often legitimate message from the bullcrap that accompanies it.  For example, one day on Fox News Channel's late afternoon show The Five, panelist Greg Gutfeld expressed his view that the NSA's amassing of cell phone records was justified to protect us from terrorists.  Fine, I get it.  Then on a later show, though, the same Gutfeld included NSA on a long list of "scandals" he attributed to President Obama.  The substance was his earlier comment; the bullcrap was his latter. 

Laura Ingraham, an acerbic hard-right ideologue, was filling in for Bill O'Reilly another night when she made some reasonable arguments questioning the need for a comprehensive immigration reform bill.  But she had to then get personally derisive about Obama, spinning (on the "no-spin" show) extremely negatively on his ongoing European trip and how weak and irrelevant he appeared.  As a matter of fact, Ingraham couldn't use the name "Obama" in a sentence without saying something personally derogatory about the man.  Bullcrap.

These politically-slanted commentators are entitled, I suppose, to rant irrationally with personal disdain about whomever they want.  But doing this makes the task of filtering out the often very compelling, relevant points they are trying to make from the nonsense quite tedious and difficult at times.  Too bad. 

Both Greg Gutfeld and Laura Ingraham are obviously very intelligent people, with substantial talent in the way of expressing themselves and doing so with a flair for humor.  But both have also succumbed to this nasty tendency I see too often in the media to be personally derisive of those with views different from theirs while turning a blind eye to those flawed individuals (aren't we ALL flawed) with whom they share the same politics.  They can do better than this!

Still, I'm realistic about the state of things in the media.  It's up to ME to listen carefully to what is being said and to intelligently discern what is true and significant among what is largely verbal garbage...

Travel as a Goal in Itself

There are a couple of people in my life who, although they retain a nominal home address, more often than not seem to be on the road, traveling to other destinations. One has a calling to the Christian mission field while the other has nuclear and extended family members strewn out all over the country, putting out much time, effort, and expense visiting these and in turn, traveling with some of them to other places.  Both have definite purposes and reasons for their travel, to be sure.  But I can't help but think that there is something intrinsic to the process of travel itself that draws them to it, not just their stated goals. 

I am not by nature a traveler, although destinations are another matter entirely.  For example, I rather dig visiting theme parks and enjoy roller coasters and other thrill rides.  But there aren't any theme parks within 97 miles of my house, although between 97 and 135 miles there are nine (Valdosta's Wild Adventures, Tampa's Busch Gardens, and Orlando's four Walt Disney World parks, Universal's two and Sea World).  But the thought of driving to any of these and back, even to Wild Adventures (the nearest one) is definitely a negative drag on the experience, something that subtracts from my ultimate enjoying and which wears me down.  If I could just step through some interdimensional door and come out the other side into one of these places (similar to how Stephen King's Roland character in the Dark Tower series stepped through such a door on an isolated beach into our world to recruit Eddie for his cause), that would be all right with me.  For I generally disdain the process of travel.  But for those who seem addicted to it, they like it all: the preparation, the packing, the unpacking, driving, flying, going through airports and stations, renting cars, making reservations, driving, riding,... you name it.  No, I don't like to go places, generally speaking.  But there are a lot of places that I would like to BE at, without the hassle of travel...

Three Very Successful NBA Coaches Let Go

Within the National Basketball Association's Western Conference are three franchises that have provided their cities' fans with a lot to cheer for and be excited about.  The Los Angeles Clippers, Memphis Grizzlies, and Denver Nuggets each enjoyed exemplary seasons in 2012-13, all finishing high in their divisions and making the playoffs.  The Clippers actually did something unheard of for that franchise: they flat-out WON their division after playing second fiddle within their own city for so many years to the Lakers.  The Grizzlies went far into the playoffs, making it to the Conference finals.  And the Nuggets, with their fast style of play, won for their head coach the league's prestigious Coach of the Year award for 2012-13.  Yes, for Los Angeles, Memphis, and Denver, their respective coaches Vinny Del Negro, Lionel Hollins, and George Karl must feel pretty confident, respected, and accepted...right?  Well, not exactly...all three were summarily fired immediately after their season ended! [Caveat: Hollins wasn't technically fired: his contract just wasn't renewed.]

Ironically, there seems to be an almost circular shuffling around with these coaches and teams! Denver now wants Hollins.  I don't get it: it is as if every NBA franchise owner is suffering from the delusion that their team alone has the talent to win it all...and if it doesn't, regardless how ultimately successful it was, that "failure" must be the head coach's fault.  Well, I really liked Lionel Hollins as a coach and will follow him in the future, pulling for whichever team is wise enough to sign him.  As for the Memphis Grizzlies, I'm finished rooting for them...

Greg Gutfeld and Bill Maher

Greg Gutfeld and Bill Maher, who are respectively conservative and liberal commentators, each with his own regular TV show, are often abrasive, sarcastic, and personally derisive of others with the opposing worldview.  Yet at times I find the two both essentially saying the same thing.  The following is a case in point.

During the latest revelation that the National Security Agency has collected the contacts of millions of Verizon cell phone customers in the pursuit of potential terrorists, many opinion makers from opposite ends of the political spectrum have interpreted this as an example of government gone too far and as an assault on individual liberties...namely in terms of violating the Fourth Amendment that was designed to protect privacy.  But both Gutfeld and Maher have exasperated their respective political allies by coming out in favor of the NSA action, each agreeing that national security and the protection of the people against attack...especially nuclear attack (both specifically mentioned this)...is paramount and trumps any claims for the sake of personal privacy.  I agree and would like to add that the government is also constitutionally mandated with protecting its people and borders against attack from abroad.  

Still, I have to say that Maher is more consistent with his views.  After all, when discussing even very moderate, limited firearms regulation following a recent series of brutal public mass murders involving automatic weapons, Gutfeld refused to acknowledge government's legitimate role to protect its citizenry from THIS legitimate threat.  To him, the Second Amendment matters (although the Fourth doesn't, apparently).  At least Maher is consistent by supporting gun control legislation.

Both Gutfeld and Maher are nonreligious, although again there is a difference between the two.  To his discredit, Maher tends to ridicule religion and those who are adherents, while Gutfeld displays a more mature respect for those whose views on the subject differ from him.  Of course, it might also be said that he isn't particularly tolerant of Islam (neither is Maher, for that matter). Not that I would completely criticize either for this, though, as it seems to me that many followers of this important world faith could benefit from some needed maturity and grace when it comes to THEM tolerating others with different perspectives.

I don't subscribe to HBO, which carries Bill Maher's show Real Time.  I have seen some excerpts of it from time to time, though, and watched an episode once when my local cable company was showing HBO for free as a subscription promotion.  I do get Fox News, which has Greg Gutfeld on quite a lot.  Although he is virulently and irrationally biased against Obama, I find myself enjoying his delivery and humor.  It kind of reminds me of Maher, as a matter of fact.  Of course, the latter has had a tendency to go overboard about Bush. But although I see some entertainment and informational value in watching these two, don't get me wrong:  in them I see the kind of snide, repulsive smartass arrogance I've experienced in my own life from certain other types, mainly from back in high school.  Maybe that says something in itself: essentially Gutfeld and Maher present themselves as adolescent personalities who never completely psychologically grew up...

Perfunctory Continuity Entry

Just to establish a sense of continuity, I am submitting a short entry to demonstrate that I haven't completely forgotten about this blog.  One problem I am going through is that I don't feel that sense of readership that I had in olden times when I would publish on it.  And quite frankly, I'm not sure that I particularly WANT some people to read it, anyway, considering the attitudes in others I've experienced of late.  I still have my own opinions about a wide range of topics: I just don't feel very motivated in expressing them, that's all...

The Meaning of a Communication is the Response You Get

I'm a bit skeptical of organizations that tout how comprehensively benevolent their agenda is for humankind...Neuro-linguistic Programming, or NLP...which sounds super-scientific, doesn't it...is an example.  You can look them up if you'd like...I'm not interested.  But I did indirectly pick up one of this self-help group's precepts...through Tony Robbins...which is very profound and true when it comes to interpersonal relationships: The meaning of a communication is the response you get...

If a mother or father tells their child to do something, it may not be enough to just say it and walk away.  Instead, asking the child to repeat what was said and to say whether they understood completes the communication while imparting a sense of personal responsibility to the child.  Likewise, I have personally discovered in my workplace that expressed expectations of employees need to be accompanied with their acknowledgement of those expectations.  Yet when it came to my own experiences throughout the elementary and high school years, nothing of the sort ever happened between any of my teachers and myself...

The responsibility for seeing that a communication is effective is on the communicator to be proactive in seeking a response from the party receiving it...and it needs to be done on an individual basis, not just in a large group setting.  In a classroom setting, the tendency from my own experiences in school was for the teacher to hand out "learning activity packages"...i.e. enhanced syllabi...and speak to the students as a collective body from the front of the class, if at all.  To be sure, students were accorded time to meet with teachers and ask questions if they took the initiative to do so, but NOT ONCE in my twelve years from the first grade in 1962 to graduation in 1974 did any teacher approach me one-to-one to establish that I knew what the class was about and what was expected of me.  Furthermore, NOT ONCE in those twelve years did any teacher ever approach me as an individual human being to encourage me or tactfully ask if I had any difficulties I wanted to share with them.  I DID experience, on a number of occasions sprinkled throughout those years, teachers angrily coming to me and chastising me about something or another...often with me being totally innocent while in the process humiliating me in front of classmates...but even then they weren't interested in my point of view: my role apparently was to keep my mouth shut and stay out of their attention range...

Once I saw a Twilight Zone episode titled Changing of the Guard that featured an elderly teacher forced into retirement.  He had spent his entire adult life teaching his pupils and remembered every one and their idiosyncrasies.  In despair he feared he had wasted his life to no effect, but his old students from years back returned one day and assembled...from the "twilight zone"...each telling him what a difference he had made in their lives.  I wonder about all of the teachers I had...and whether they could even get a row of students to speak for them, much less a full classroom.  If I sound bitter, I am: I think that there were crucial periods in my childhood when a positive, encouraging word from a teacher would have made all the difference and have changed my life...but it never came.  Yet I'll bet each and every one of the teachers I had were confident that THEY were doing their job well as it pertained to me, who was to them merely a name attached to a face that I doubt hardly any of them remembered (or cared to) only a few years later.  To them I say: if you think you taught me something but never knew me as a distinct person with my own identity and personality...and viewpoint...then you have failed at your job.  I sincerely hope that my readers' school experiences with their teachers were different from mine...maybe you had some of those great interactive teachers like in those NEA television ads...

So direct interactions would be more effective if the speaker asked for pertinent feedback from the one spoken to.  But what about writing?  After all, I am communicating here and that's true whether or not the reader agrees with me.  Obviously, people can choose whether or not to read what I write...but if they do, then wouldn't it seem appropriate to offer at least some perfunctory acknowledgment that they had done so?  I post links to this blog on Facebook, which offers this sort of feedback system to postings.  And while I tend to skip over others' posts that may contain interesting content but are merely copy-and-paste exercises on their part, when I read something that is original and relatively coherent...and I believe to be directed either at me or the general reader...I have a tendency to click on "like" and sometimes even volunteer a comment.   Some of my articles are likewise directed at certain folks I have "befriended" on Facebook.  Now many don't read my writings but for those who do, wouldn't it be an act of constructive friendship to at least acknowledge me...or better yet...write your own reactions in a comment? 

Speaking of blog comments, there are two ways to accomplish this: one is if you are getting it through my Facebook link...just use this site's comments feature as you would any other post.  But you can also bypass Facebook and submit a comment directly to this blog by clicking on the "Number of Comments"  or "Post a Comment" links after the end of the individual article.  It won't be printed until I have read it...you can even request it remain unprinted or even write anonymously...and would finally appear on the blogsite right after the article.  A little more of a roundabout way, but it gives you more flexibility and enables those not on my Facebook page to communicate as well...

From Star 99.5 to Party 99.5

One of the more interesting radio stations we've had here in Gainesville is on 99.5: WBXY.  Until just a few days ago it had an all-talk format, branding itself as "Star 99.5".  Its owners, however, did not see their expected return on their investment and dramatically changed the programming to around-the-clock electronic dance music, with the new appellation "Party 99.5".  I have mixed feelings about this change, which on the surface seems to cater to the more vacuous, bubble-headed elements of the listening community.

Ever since I switched in March to graveyard shift at work, I have been listening more to talk radio.  One station, 97.3 WSKY, broadcasts George Noory's Coast-to-Coast AM show.  Depending on the guest and topic, I might listen in...but usually I switch over to 99.5 (until the change, that is).  Opposite Noory, at least until 3 AM, is Jim Bohannon, a conservative talk show host who nevertheless is more typified by his rationalism than by any ideology.  But from 3 to 5 was when I REALLY tuned in to this station, because that was when one of this age's truly amazing radio acts was on: Phil Hendrie.  Hendrie has had a show for several years in which he interviews a variety of guests, with the aid of his studio on-air assistants...and some of the guests substitute for him on the air as well.  These people have very idiosyncratic views, to say the least, and their personalities can be a little over the top.  But the amazing thing about all of these people is that they are ALL Phil Hendrie himself, casting his voice around seamlessly from one character to another without arousing any indication that he is up to this grand subterfuge of impersonation.  What a talent!  My favorite of his many characters is the overly sensitive, lawsuit-compulsive Steve Bosell.  I'll miss Phil with the programming change.  Ditto to a lesser degree for Jim Bohannon.  But WBXY also had some folks that, in my opinion, were little more than vile hate-mongers: Michael Savage and Mark Levin.  And the FoxNews hack for the Republicans, Sean Hannity, also had his show as well.  Maybe these extremist right-wing "stars" will soon get back on in Gainesville on other stations, but for now I feel no loss at their current absence.

As for the new programming, I like it.  The driving, pounding music is very energetic and fun to listen to.  I think that if one just wanted to get a good exercise workout in their own home, they could just turn on this station at any time of the day or night and just dance to it!

June Starts With Run

I began the month of June with a couple of runs, one being for 2.28 miles around my neighborhood.  My foot felt fine and I could have gone further, although I clearly wasn't in my earlier fitness level.  Nevertheless, I ran the same pace I usually do.  Hopefully, I'll be able to resume regular running again, albeit with rest times interposed between runs.