Monday, April 20, 2026
The Beautiful Mind, a Beautiful Day, Medical Matters
Tuesday, March 17, 2026
Early A.M. about Awards, War, ''allies", Exercise, Day Ahead
Saturday, March 14, 2026
Showed Up at Depot Parkrun, Walked a Lap
Sunday, April 3, 2022
About Will Smith's Incredible Hulk Moment at the Oscars
The Incredible Hulk was a popular TV series in the late seventies and early eighties. Based on the Marvel comics character, Bill Bixby starred as mild-mannered Dr. David Bannister, a scientist who accidently exposes himself to such an excess of gamma ray radiation that, in times of extreme stress and anxiety, causes his body to transform into a raging monster, the Hulk (played by Lou Ferrigno). Not exactly Jekyll and Hyde...Robert Louis Stevenson's character actually changed into a completely different personality...the Hulk retains Bannister's moral compass and compassion. It's just out of control, stuck in a fight-or-flight mode...much like that we experience in our own lives when we're under tense and difficult circumstances, became angry or fearful, and our sympathetic nervous system temporarily gains supremacy over our thoughts and behavior. And although this period may only last for a few minutes, we're often left with the consequences of irrational and antisocial public behavior. This is what I believe happened to Will Smith at the Academy Award ceremony the other night when he rushed the stage and slapped (and immediately thereafter cursed at) comedian Chris Rock for making one of his trademark insulting offhand jokes, this one aimed at Smith's wife Jada for her shaven head (she suffers from alopecia). He was already center-stage and under the spotlight, a favorite to win Best Actor for his dramatic performance in the movie King Richard and most likely already was feeling a bit stressed out. Soon after the incident Smith was very contrite and apologetic for his impulsive action, but will continue to suffer its fallout. Just who is Will Smith...the soft-spoken and congenial gentleman so many have come to appreciate or the creepy violent dude revealed in that unfortunate moment before the world? Both, I imagine, just as each of us have this duality...I just think most of us, although probably unpleasant to be around in those moments of extreme anxiety and anger, don't resort to physically violent behavior. Instead, dramatic and sometimes profane language, extreme passive-negative behavior, or a total shutdown from interaction can be common reactions to those experiencing personal Hulk transformations. I do find the media reactions to it all interesting. After realizing the other night that the Oscars were going to show because of the Red Carpet pre-ceremony show, with outfit after gawdy, tasteless outfit touted as high fashion, I made it a deliberate point to avoid the awards...finding out about the Smith/Rock altercation later. The reactions were divided between those praising Smith for defending his wife's honor and those condemning his violence. And then the media ghouls went to work, digging up items in both Smith's and Rock's pasts and citing things they had said before. Different celebrities went to work giving their own feedback, and then the ghouls researched them, digging up even more negative news to promulgate over social and mass media. What a media circus, and a macabre one at that!
Thursday, September 2, 2021
Recently Saw the Movie Dances with Wolves
This past weekend Melissa and I decided to watch a movie at home together. Being Netflix subscribers, we browsed through what was available and I noticed the 1990 movie Dances with Wolves. Neither of us had seen it, and I knew it was critically acclaimed and won multiple Oscars, including Best Picture. So in spite of the fact that it was listed as lasting for more than 3 hours, we settled down to watch it. Kevin Costner starred in it, directing, co-producing and portraying the protagonist. Adapted from the same-titled book by Michael Blake, Costner's character was that of Lt. John Dunbar of the United States (Union) Army, whose introductory scene in the Civil War has him lying in a medical tent with his injured foot about to be sawed off. Somehow he manages to painfully put his boots back on and sneak away, but he realizes that he's liable to suffer a slow death from infection and decides impulsively at the start of a battle with entrenched Confederate soldiers to take a horse and ride to his death in front of their lines. But miraculously none of the enemy soldiers' bullets find him, and his action spurs his own side to boldly attack, winning the confrontation and resulting in Dunbar getting the best medical treatment for his foot, a promotion in rank, decorations, and the choice of where his next assignment will be. Finished with the war, he chooses the westernmost outpost, deep in the northern Great Plains. Eventually he is further assigned to a remote post in the middle of nowhere and which has been abandoned. From here he faithfully performs his duties in solitude until he discovers he is not alone...there are Indians nearby, camped by the creek with many horses and tents. And from here the story takes off about how this one soldier first confronts, then befriends...and finally joins the Sioux people, complete with buffalo hunts and a battle against their enemy, the Pawnee. He also finds love among his adoptive people. But Dunbar knows that the whites will be coming in great numbers here, led by his own Army...and the meeting of the two cultures can only go one way. The movie's ending as expected is very climactic and I felt that both Blake the author and Costner the director and actor did a great job spinning a very compelling tale...no wonder it garnered those awards. Still, I have some issues about it to discuss...
I remember, when Dances with Wolves first came out, from its description that it sounded an awful lot like the 1970 Dustin Hoffman film Little Big Man. In fact, while the later story essentially was independent and stood well on its own, I kept noticing elements of the first movie that were incorporated into it...there seems to have been a lot of derivation going on. Even the Pawnee Indians were depicted as thoroughly murderous and depraved in both movies. Which brought me to another problem: the Pawnee were shown to be collectively and individually bad while the Sioux were just wonderful in every way. The white Union soldiers, when they finally arrived on the scene (except for Costner's character, of character), were dominated by cruelty, petty greed, fear, and bigotry. Were these three groups really this distinctly categorizable? I think not...I tend to believe, and you're free to disagree with me, that within different ethnicities of people there are both the good and the bad, and yes, sometimes the net effect of those different groups meeting one another will result in one becoming dominant, sadly at times even to the point of genocide. But if I were a descendant of the Pawnee nation I'd really feel like my ancestors were getting a unfair, bad rap from these movies. Nevertheless, I thought Dances with Wolves was great and Costner deserved all the accolades he received for it. Still, it was a little difficult sitting through three hours of it...we decided halfway through to take a break and walk around the block...
Tuesday, March 6, 2018
Tueday's List: Past Oscars Best Picture Winners
1927-28 WINGS
1928-29 THE BROADWAY MELODY
1929-30 ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT...saw in part:5
1930-31 CIMARRON
1931-32 GRAND HOTEL
1932-33 CAVALCADE
1934 IT HAPPENED ONE NIGHT
1935 MUTINY ON THE BOUNTY....saw:5
1936 THE GREAT ZIEGFELD
1937 THE LIFE OF EMILE ZOLA
1938 YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU...saw in part:3
1939 GONE WITH THE WIND....saw first half:3
1940 REBECCA
1941 HOW GREEN WAS MY VALLEY
1942 MRS. MINIVER
1943 CASABLANCA...saw:5
1944 GOING MY WAY
1945 THE LOST WEEKEND
1946 THE BEST YEARS OF OUR LIVES
1947 GENTLEMAN'S AGREEMENT
1948 HAMLET
1949 ALL THE KING'S MEN
1950 ALL ABOUT EVE
1951 AN AMERICAN IN PARIS
1952 THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH
1953 FROM HERE TO ETERNITY...saw:4
1954 ON THE WATERFRONT...saw in part:4
1955 MARTY
1956 AROUND THE WORLD IN 80 DAYS
1957 BRIDGE ON THE RIVER KWAI...saw:5
1958 GIGI
1959 BEN-HUR
1960 THE APARTMENT
1961 WEST SIDE STORY...saw in part:3
1962 LAWRENCE OF ARABIA
1963 TOM JONES
1964 MY FAIR LADY...saw:5
1965 THE SOUND OF MUSIC...saw:5
1966 A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS
1967 IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT
1968 OLIVER!
1969 MIDNIGHT COWBOY...saw in part:3
1970 PATTON...saw:5
1971 THE FRENCH CONNECTION
1972 THE GODFATHER...saw:5
1973 THE STING
1974 THE GODFATHER PART II...saw:5
1975 ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST...saw:2
1976 ROCKY...saw:3
1977 ANNIE HALL...saw:2
1978 THE DEER HUNTER
1979 KRAMER VS. KRAMER
1980 ORDINARY PEOPLE...saw:3
1981 CHARIOTS OF FIRE...saw:4
1982 GANDHI
1983 TERMS OF ENDEARMENT
1984 AMADEUS
1985 OUT OF AFRICA...saw:1
1986 PLATOON...saw:5
1987 THE LAST EMPEROR...saw:3
1988 RAIN MAN...saw:4
1989 DRIVING MISS DAISY
1990 DANCES WITH WOLVES
1991 THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS...saw:4
1992 UNFORGIVEN...saw:4
1993 SCHINDLER'S LIST
1994 FORREST GUMP...saw:5
1995 BRAVEHEART
1996 THE ENGLISH PATIENT
1997 TITANIC
1998 SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE
1999 AMERICAN BEAUTY
2000 GLADIATOR
2001 A BEAUTIFUL MIND...saw:5
2002 CHICAGO
2003 THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RETURN OF THE KING...saw:5
2004 MILLION DOLLAR BABY
2005 CRASH
2006 THE DEPARTED
2007 NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN...saw:4
2008 SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE
2009 THE HURT LOCKER
2010 THE KING'S SPEECH
2011 THE ARTIST
2012 ARGO
2013 12 YEARS A SLAVE
2014 BIRDMAN
2015 SPOTLIGHT
2016 MOONLIGHT
2017 THE SHAPE OF WATER
Sunday, October 8, 2017
Rock and Roll Elitism
The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, located in Cleveland, Ohio, was founded in 1983 and began inducting members two years later. It appropriately took very little time for the musical innovators from the 1950s and earlier like Chuck Berry and Little Richard to gain admittance as well as supergroups like the Beatles and Rolling Stones. Over the years the membership list has swelled in number...yet several of the inductees do not enjoy anything approaching general popularity and many of those refused entrance were important and extremely popular during their time. Of the bands I mentioned before, only Rush, Journey, and Yes were inducted...and only just recently, almost as afterthoughts. True, the Moody Blues are on the list of next year's nominees put out just four days ago, a list also including Radiohead, Rage Against the Machine, the Cars, Bon Jovi, Kate Bush, J. Geils Band, Depeche Mode...among others. The final inductees will be announced in a couple of months, but should I even care whether the Moody Blues, one of my all-time favorite bands, is selected? And what about the Doobie Brothers, not even nominated...I just don't get this elitism...
To me, the essence of what rock and roll is all about is young folks listening to the records of their music idols and copying out and practicing the songs on their guitars and other instruments until they can completely cover them...and then coming up with their own original music...that's how the Beatles and the Stones got started and it has absolutely nothing to do with professional critics and music historians, noses upturned, sitting on their high and mighty thrones pronouncing their judgments on what is influential and artistic and what isn't. Rock and roll is the people's music, belonging to the masses, not to an exclusive club of insiders who think and act like they know better than everyone else...
Sunday, February 12, 2017
Watching the Grammys Right Now on CBS
No, I don't care for much of the music being aired here on the Grammys...but I believe that the way this show has been conducted (so far) is far classier and more professionally done than were the MTV Video Awards a few months ago, one of the more unpleasant (putting it lightly) spectacles ever to disgrace my television screen...