I began to follow English Premier League professional soccer in the fall of 2014...its season is like that of basketball and hockey, a hyphenation of two years. So this 2016-17 season is the third that I've been a fan of this sport as it is played on the most elite level. And without a doubt, the dominant story so far has been the tumultuous run of the Leicester City Football Club, nicknamed the "Foxes"...although West London's Chelsea team, which stands poised to win its second league title in three years, might want to argue with that conclusion...
In most pro soccer leagues in the world, including here in the United States and Canada, there is a hierarchy of leagues, with the top-flight premier league at the top, naturally sporting the best teams. Then there are leagues #2, #3, and so forth...depending on how many a country may have. England's soccer establishment is so entrenched that it has more than 20 levels. Well, in most countries (but not ours) there is movement between these leagues: for example, each year the three worst finishers in the twenty-team English Premier League are relegated (demoted) to England's second-tier league, which is deceptively called "Football League Championship"...and that league in turn promotes its top three finishers up to the Premier League to replace them. In the 2013-14 season Leicester City, traditionally a second-tier team, ran away with the Championship title, which earned them promotion into the Premier League the following year. But in 2014-15, they were struggling greatly, and as late as April were deeply mired in twentieth (and last) place, almost certain to be relegated back to their former league. And then inexplicably they caught fire and won seven of their last nine games, earning them a 14th place finish and a pass to play again among the "big boys"...
Which brings us to last year: for the 2015-16 season Leicester City hired a new manager, Claudio Ranieri, and they quickly surprised everyone by rising to lead the league from the start. Part of this early season success was due to a scoring frenzy by their striker, Jamie Vardy, at one stretch having scored 13 goals in 11 games. Eventually, though, it was thought that the Foxes would finally settle down to a lower place in the standings...instead, their defense took hold and they coasted easily to the title even as their offense cooled off. And since there is no playoff system in English league soccer, Leicester City won the league championship with 23 wins, only 3 losses, and 12 draws. And now we come to this 2016-17 season...
With the same manager and core lineup of players, Leicester City has floundered in mediocrity. The same Jamie Vardy, after 24 games, has only one goal to his credit and, what's even worse, that intimidating defense of theirs has completely disappeared. They have not only been losing games, but they have been losing them by embarrassing margins. Leicester City's record at this writing is only 5 wins, 13 losses, and 6 draws. But even more ominous is that they are in 16th place and only one point ahead of the dreaded relegation zone. And they are on a four-game losing streak at that...
Next week Leicester City will play Swansea, currently in 17th place. Should the Foxes fall to them, it is considered a certainty that Ranieri will be fired...and Leicester City may well be on the way to relegation, just one year after they won the entire Premier League championship and three after they were promoted. What a rollercoaster ride!
You can follow English Premier League soccer on NBCSports and NBC. Check out your TV schedule for the channels in your area...Gainesville has them on Cox Cable channels 33 and 9, respectively. The games are shown live on Saturday and Sunday mornings, with another usually shown on Saturday afternoon...
Sunday, February 5, 2017
Saturday, February 4, 2017
Supreme Court Vacancies During Presidential Election Years
Last Tuesday President Trump announced his choice for the U.S. Supreme Court seat vacated by the late Antonin Scalia in February of 2016: federal judge Neil Gorsuch. I myself don't have much of a problem with this nomination other than my feeling that it should have been the previous president, Barack Obama, to make and that his selection of judge Merrick Garland was unfairly shunned and rejected by the Republican Senate majority led by Mitch McConnell. Their claim that it is a tradition for vacancies within the highest court to not be subjected to election-year politics made me want to look into the past record in this area...so here are my results...
Here is a list of the past United States Supreme Court vacancies that have arisen during a presidential election year. At the end of each entry is indicated whether the political party of the sitting president at the time of vacancy was the same or different from that which controlled the Senate: (note: this list looks better on a laptop or desktop screen)
DEPARTING JUSTICE NEW JUSTICE PARTY
1800 12/15 Oliver Ellsworth (resigned) 1801 2/04 John Marshall same
1804 1/26 Alfred Moore (resigned) 1800 5/07 William Johnson same
1828 8/25 Robert Trimble 1829 3/07 John McLean different
1844 4/21 Henry Baldwin 1846 8/04 Robert Grier same
1852 7/19 John McKinley 1853 3/53 John Campbell same
1860 5/31 Peter Daniel 1862 7/16 Samuel Miller same
1864 10/12 Roger Taney 1864 12/15 Samuel Chase same
1872 11/28* Samuel Nelson (retired) 1872 12/11 Ward Hunt same
1880 12/14* William Strong (retired) 1880 12/21 William Words different
1888 3/23 Morrison Waite 1888 10/08 George Shiras different
1916 1/02 Joseph Lamar 1916 6/01 Louis Brandeis same
1916 6/10 Charles Evan Hughes (resigned) 1916 7/29 John Clarke same
1932 1/12 Oliver Wendell Holmes (retired) 1932 3/02 Benjamin Cardozo different
1956 10/15 Sherman Minter (retired) 1956 3/22 William Brennan different
2016 2/13 Antonin Scalia ---?????---- different
* vacancy occurred after election
First note that, given that there have been 104 total vacancies so far that required a Senate confirmation process for the successor (including the position of Chief Justice), only 15 have occurred during presidential election years...if this were a random process, around one fourth, or 26, would have happened. And this discrepancy, already notable as it is, has drastically increased during the last 80+ years...within that long span, until Justice Scalia passed away last year, there was only one election-year vacancy: Sherman Minter's retirement in October of 1956. In that year, Dwight Eisenhower was running for reelection when the vacancy occurred less than a month from the election. He announced his pick to be William Brennan, reportedly hoping that his nominee's Roman Catholic affiliation would help him in some of the northern states...but Brennan wasn't confirmed until the following year. In 1932 then-president Herbert Hoover, a Republican, deliberately chose a Democrat, Benjamin Cardozo, to fill that election year vacancy...he was promptly confirmed by the Democratic-controlled Senate. You would have to go back to 1888, when Grover Cleveland had his election-year nominee George Shiras confirmed in October by the opposition-lead Senate, to find another example of an opposition Senate confirming a president's Supreme Court pick during an election year. But keep in mind that back then the election campaigning began much later and closer to the election...now it begins in the first half of the previous year. In 1880, that nomination occurred after the election and in 1828 the vacancy happened in the thick of the campaign...in late August: the succeeding president filled it right after he took office the following year...
So if the same party as the president's controls the Senate, then election-year filling of Supreme Court vacancies isn't that big of a deal...it's just that this scenario hasn't happened since 1916. If Supreme Court justices die while in office, they have during the past century had the good luck to do it in off-election years...until Scalia's passing last year. Usually nowadays they choose to retire first, and in doing so they deliberately avoid setting up a situation like that we found ourselves dealing with in 2016. But I don't like what Senator McConnell, Judiciary Committee Chairman Grassley, and the rest of the Senate Republican caucus did to Obama's nominee Merrick Garland by denying him even a hearing. They were also preemptive in categorically rejecting any approaches that the sitting president made toward them in regard to candidates that they might find acceptable. There is hardly any sort of tradition against election-year Supreme Court appointments and confirmations: any such tradition, if at all, comes from the justices themselves when they choose the best time to retire. I'm afraid that this sort of unprecedented action...or should I say inaction...will come back to haunt the Senate Republicans and only ratchet up the already-unacceptable level of confrontation and partisanship that has not served our Congress well in recent years. And in the immediate future, it has placed a dark cloud over the confirmation process for Neil Gorsuch...
Here is a list of the past United States Supreme Court vacancies that have arisen during a presidential election year. At the end of each entry is indicated whether the political party of the sitting president at the time of vacancy was the same or different from that which controlled the Senate: (note: this list looks better on a laptop or desktop screen)
DEPARTING JUSTICE NEW JUSTICE PARTY
1800 12/15 Oliver Ellsworth (resigned) 1801 2/04 John Marshall same
1804 1/26 Alfred Moore (resigned) 1800 5/07 William Johnson same
1828 8/25 Robert Trimble 1829 3/07 John McLean different
1844 4/21 Henry Baldwin 1846 8/04 Robert Grier same
1852 7/19 John McKinley 1853 3/53 John Campbell same
1860 5/31 Peter Daniel 1862 7/16 Samuel Miller same
1864 10/12 Roger Taney 1864 12/15 Samuel Chase same
1872 11/28* Samuel Nelson (retired) 1872 12/11 Ward Hunt same
1880 12/14* William Strong (retired) 1880 12/21 William Words different
1888 3/23 Morrison Waite 1888 10/08 George Shiras different
1916 1/02 Joseph Lamar 1916 6/01 Louis Brandeis same
1916 6/10 Charles Evan Hughes (resigned) 1916 7/29 John Clarke same
1932 1/12 Oliver Wendell Holmes (retired) 1932 3/02 Benjamin Cardozo different
1956 10/15 Sherman Minter (retired) 1956 3/22 William Brennan different
2016 2/13 Antonin Scalia ---?????---- different
* vacancy occurred after election
First note that, given that there have been 104 total vacancies so far that required a Senate confirmation process for the successor (including the position of Chief Justice), only 15 have occurred during presidential election years...if this were a random process, around one fourth, or 26, would have happened. And this discrepancy, already notable as it is, has drastically increased during the last 80+ years...within that long span, until Justice Scalia passed away last year, there was only one election-year vacancy: Sherman Minter's retirement in October of 1956. In that year, Dwight Eisenhower was running for reelection when the vacancy occurred less than a month from the election. He announced his pick to be William Brennan, reportedly hoping that his nominee's Roman Catholic affiliation would help him in some of the northern states...but Brennan wasn't confirmed until the following year. In 1932 then-president Herbert Hoover, a Republican, deliberately chose a Democrat, Benjamin Cardozo, to fill that election year vacancy...he was promptly confirmed by the Democratic-controlled Senate. You would have to go back to 1888, when Grover Cleveland had his election-year nominee George Shiras confirmed in October by the opposition-lead Senate, to find another example of an opposition Senate confirming a president's Supreme Court pick during an election year. But keep in mind that back then the election campaigning began much later and closer to the election...now it begins in the first half of the previous year. In 1880, that nomination occurred after the election and in 1828 the vacancy happened in the thick of the campaign...in late August: the succeeding president filled it right after he took office the following year...
So if the same party as the president's controls the Senate, then election-year filling of Supreme Court vacancies isn't that big of a deal...it's just that this scenario hasn't happened since 1916. If Supreme Court justices die while in office, they have during the past century had the good luck to do it in off-election years...until Scalia's passing last year. Usually nowadays they choose to retire first, and in doing so they deliberately avoid setting up a situation like that we found ourselves dealing with in 2016. But I don't like what Senator McConnell, Judiciary Committee Chairman Grassley, and the rest of the Senate Republican caucus did to Obama's nominee Merrick Garland by denying him even a hearing. They were also preemptive in categorically rejecting any approaches that the sitting president made toward them in regard to candidates that they might find acceptable. There is hardly any sort of tradition against election-year Supreme Court appointments and confirmations: any such tradition, if at all, comes from the justices themselves when they choose the best time to retire. I'm afraid that this sort of unprecedented action...or should I say inaction...will come back to haunt the Senate Republicans and only ratchet up the already-unacceptable level of confrontation and partisanship that has not served our Congress well in recent years. And in the immediate future, it has placed a dark cloud over the confirmation process for Neil Gorsuch...
Friday, February 3, 2017
Quote of the Week...from Albert Einstein
Intellectual growth should commence at birth and cease only at death. ---Albert Einstein.
The great physicist Albert Einstein lived from 1879 to 1955...I don't know when he made the above statement, but even if it was during his last days on earth, it now seems just a little bit antiquated. For the idea of life-long learning has caught on, at least in Western society, as life expectancy has increased and people often find themselves in old age with reasonably good health and plenty of time to pursue their interests. A more traditional view on the subject of education has it confined to school...from kindergarten on through college...and then it's on to the "work years" and forget about all that learning stuff. But Einstein not only promoted deliberately growing intellectually long after school is over, but also said that it starts in infancy, long before formal education begins. My parents were strong advocates of informal preschool education, and my sister Anita and I both were reading well before starting school. I have always separated in my mind the ideas of going to school and learning...the former is bounded by time, place, and curriculum while the latter is much vaster and penetrates every area of my life and the reality around me. Very often, as a matter of fact, I felt when a student back then that I'd rather be learning other things from what was in the official program of study. And now we have such ready access to information and educational resources through the Internet that anyone with that access can truly grow intellectually on a scale that Professor Einstein in his day could not have imagined...and that dude's imagination was something other-worldly...
The great physicist Albert Einstein lived from 1879 to 1955...I don't know when he made the above statement, but even if it was during his last days on earth, it now seems just a little bit antiquated. For the idea of life-long learning has caught on, at least in Western society, as life expectancy has increased and people often find themselves in old age with reasonably good health and plenty of time to pursue their interests. A more traditional view on the subject of education has it confined to school...from kindergarten on through college...and then it's on to the "work years" and forget about all that learning stuff. But Einstein not only promoted deliberately growing intellectually long after school is over, but also said that it starts in infancy, long before formal education begins. My parents were strong advocates of informal preschool education, and my sister Anita and I both were reading well before starting school. I have always separated in my mind the ideas of going to school and learning...the former is bounded by time, place, and curriculum while the latter is much vaster and penetrates every area of my life and the reality around me. Very often, as a matter of fact, I felt when a student back then that I'd rather be learning other things from what was in the official program of study. And now we have such ready access to information and educational resources through the Internet that anyone with that access can truly grow intellectually on a scale that Professor Einstein in his day could not have imagined...and that dude's imagination was something other-worldly...
Thursday, February 2, 2017
1/29 Sermon on the Life of Joseph, Part 3
At The Family Church here in Gainesville last Sunday morning, Pastor Philip Griffin continued his series he titles Upcycling: Trash to Treasure and which discusses the life of Joseph from the book of Genesis...and the lessons we can derive from it. The scripture for today's message comes from Genesis 39:7-18 and is about Joseph's encounters with the wife of Potiphar, the Egyptian for whom he is bonded to serve. Potiphar's wife continually approaches Joseph with the aim of sleeping with him...but he resists the temptation to comply with her desires, ultimately running away from her as she is holding on to his robe. Pastor Philip, from the passage, came up with six steps for us to resist the diverse temptations in our own lives: just say "no", know that succumbing to them is sin against God, keep in mind that with resistance the temptations may increase, set appropriate boundaries, and as a last resort, openly flee them. And if one is persecuted on account of resisting a temptation, then he or she can look for defense from God. As for the robe, Joseph twice in his life has his stripped from him...but ultimately wears a king's robe, bestowed by God, and which he will never lose...
The title of this series refers to things that were once refuse, deemed generally worthless, but with love and care were turned into "something beautiful", as our pastor has said. Throughout this series, up on the church's stage and on the wall behind it have been exhibited paintings and sculptures that were done using essentially trash...a good visual analogy to the transformational work that God can do with us if only we allow it. As to the scripture for this message, I've presented it at the end of this article, again in the New International Version by way of Bible Gateway. The Family Church is located at 2022 SW 122 Street and holds its Sunday morning services at 9:30 and 11. The sermons have all been saved on YouTube and you can see this one by accessing The Family Church video site on it...here is a link: [link]...
BIBLE PASSAGE FOR MESSAGE: GENESIS 39:7-18
7 and after a while his master’s wife took notice of Joseph and said, “Come to bed with me!”
8 But he refused. “With me in charge,” he told her, “my master does not concern himself with anything in the house; everything he owns he has entrusted to my care. 9 No one is greater in this house than I am. My master has withheld nothing from me except you, because you are his wife. How then could I do such a wicked thing and sin against God?” 10 And though she spoke to Joseph day after day, he refused to go to bed with her or even be with her.
11 One day he went into the house to attend to his duties, and none of the household servants was inside. 12 She caught him by his cloak and said, “Come to bed with me!” But he left his cloak in her hand and ran out of the house.
13 When she saw that he had left his cloak in her hand and had run out of the house, 14 she called her household servants. “Look,” she said to them, “this Hebrew has been brought to us to make sport of us! He came in here to sleep with me, but I screamed. 15 When he heard me scream for help, he left his cloak beside me and ran out of the house.”
16 She kept his cloak beside her until his master came home. 17 Then she told him this story: “That Hebrew slave you brought us came to me to make sport of me. 18 But as soon as I screamed for help, he left his cloak beside me and ran out of the house.”
The title of this series refers to things that were once refuse, deemed generally worthless, but with love and care were turned into "something beautiful", as our pastor has said. Throughout this series, up on the church's stage and on the wall behind it have been exhibited paintings and sculptures that were done using essentially trash...a good visual analogy to the transformational work that God can do with us if only we allow it. As to the scripture for this message, I've presented it at the end of this article, again in the New International Version by way of Bible Gateway. The Family Church is located at 2022 SW 122 Street and holds its Sunday morning services at 9:30 and 11. The sermons have all been saved on YouTube and you can see this one by accessing The Family Church video site on it...here is a link: [link]...
BIBLE PASSAGE FOR MESSAGE: GENESIS 39:7-18
7 and after a while his master’s wife took notice of Joseph and said, “Come to bed with me!”
8 But he refused. “With me in charge,” he told her, “my master does not concern himself with anything in the house; everything he owns he has entrusted to my care. 9 No one is greater in this house than I am. My master has withheld nothing from me except you, because you are his wife. How then could I do such a wicked thing and sin against God?” 10 And though she spoke to Joseph day after day, he refused to go to bed with her or even be with her.
11 One day he went into the house to attend to his duties, and none of the household servants was inside. 12 She caught him by his cloak and said, “Come to bed with me!” But he left his cloak in her hand and ran out of the house.
13 When she saw that he had left his cloak in her hand and had run out of the house, 14 she called her household servants. “Look,” she said to them, “this Hebrew has been brought to us to make sport of us! He came in here to sleep with me, but I screamed. 15 When he heard me scream for help, he left his cloak beside me and ran out of the house.”
16 She kept his cloak beside her until his master came home. 17 Then she told him this story: “That Hebrew slave you brought us came to me to make sport of me. 18 But as soon as I screamed for help, he left his cloak beside me and ran out of the house.”
Wednesday, February 1, 2017
Just Finished Reading Barnaby Rudge by Charles Dickens
Barnaby Rudge is one of the early stories that celebrated Victorian-era English author Charles Dickens published, and it is a historical novel at that, concerning itself with the infamous anti-Catholic Gordon Riots that occurred in London in 1780...and I just finished reading it. The title refers to one of the characters, a pleasant young man whose mental abilities are at about the level of cinema's Forrest Gump...in today's highly-charged politically-correct parlance, he might be called an "innocent". Barnaby, however, is not the central figure in this tale...actually no one is. Instead, Dickens flits back and forth in his narrative among five families: the Willets, who have an inn on London's outskirts, the wealthy and virtuous Haredales, the Vardens with their locksmith business, the also-wealthy and upper-class Chesters with the villainous father, and of course the Rudges. There are two romances in the story, as well as a number of subplots...including a mysterious stranger, an unsolved murder, two father-son rifts, and a simmering lower class rebellion that ultimately finds its expression in, as I had mentioned earlier, anti-Catholic riots manipulated by a real historical figure: Lord George Gordon. And like Forrest Gump with his number of presidential encounters, our hero Barnaby unwittingly finds himself drawn into the middle of this real historical event.
This novel probably would have meant more to me were I alive in England at the time of this novel's publication in the early 1840s. Back then there were evidently growing tensions between the rigidly-defined social classes as well as religious divisions between Protestants and Catholics going back centuries. So in this sense Barnaby Rudge was educational and enlightening...although sadly not very entertaining. It was the lack of a strong central character, the book's title notwithstanding, that makes me want to go on to read some more of Charles Dickens' works in search of something better: I have, after all, "great expectations" of this renown writer...
This novel probably would have meant more to me were I alive in England at the time of this novel's publication in the early 1840s. Back then there were evidently growing tensions between the rigidly-defined social classes as well as religious divisions between Protestants and Catholics going back centuries. So in this sense Barnaby Rudge was educational and enlightening...although sadly not very entertaining. It was the lack of a strong central character, the book's title notwithstanding, that makes me want to go on to read some more of Charles Dickens' works in search of something better: I have, after all, "great expectations" of this renown writer...
Tuesday, January 31, 2017
My January 2017 Running Report
I wrote the day before yesterday how I have been sidelined from my usual running due to sickness and a nagging cough, including missing out on two races I had wanted to run in. Right now I'm taking a break from the activity until my throat is fully healed...it shouldn't be much longer. So this first month of 2017 hasn't gone too well, and that's a shame: the weather for the past few days would have been ideal for long-distance jogs through my established courses in far northwestern Gainesville, and that 15K race I missed last Saturday morning had perfect weather conditions: very dry and around 40 degrees at its start. Oh well, let's see what the future holds for me...
In January I somehow managed to accumulate a total of 84 miles run, almost all of it done by running short distances multiple times per day...my longest single run was for only 3.3 miles. I missed running on seven days, and on several others just ran a minimal amount...my least productive running month in quite a while...
Gainesville's Five Points of Life Half-Marathon, which I ran in 2010, 2014, and 2015, will be held on February 26, and I would like to run in it. But where I stand right now, the near-future is very uncertain, I haven't been training much due to sickness, and this race is for 13.1 miles...not a very promising picture, to say the least. But I have to live each day as it comes and on its own terms...come the week before the race, I'll assess my readiness and then act accordingly...
I'm also thinking of dividing my physical activity in the future between running, bicycling, and walking. In the long run, this sounds like a wise and enduring path to follow...
In January I somehow managed to accumulate a total of 84 miles run, almost all of it done by running short distances multiple times per day...my longest single run was for only 3.3 miles. I missed running on seven days, and on several others just ran a minimal amount...my least productive running month in quite a while...
Gainesville's Five Points of Life Half-Marathon, which I ran in 2010, 2014, and 2015, will be held on February 26, and I would like to run in it. But where I stand right now, the near-future is very uncertain, I haven't been training much due to sickness, and this race is for 13.1 miles...not a very promising picture, to say the least. But I have to live each day as it comes and on its own terms...come the week before the race, I'll assess my readiness and then act accordingly...
I'm also thinking of dividing my physical activity in the future between running, bicycling, and walking. In the long run, this sounds like a wise and enduring path to follow...
Monday, January 30, 2017
Enjoying Putting Together a Good Jigsaw Puzzle
This weekend I began "work" on a new 1500-piece jigsaw puzzle my son Will gave me for Christmas. It is a picture of several beautiful specimens of shells, starfish, and other "bottom feeders", full of different colors and assorted shapes. I'm accustomed to do the 300-500 piece puzzles, largely because I simply don't have the large flat surface available to do the larger varieties. With this one, I've broken down the process to two medium surfaces and some boxes into which I presort the pieces by color. It looks now like I'm about two thirds of the way to completion, but there are still a lot more pieces to fit together.
Putting together jigsaw puzzles is a fun activity I've enjoyed doing ever since I can remember...back when I was a little kid we would do some monster-size puzzles by spreading out the pieces on the floor (out of the way of foot traffic, of course) and it would be there for days, if not weeks, at a time...with anyone passing by welcome to work on it. Naturally, being much closer to the ground at the time than anyone else, I had a decided advantage over everyone in my family except my sister Anita, who is four years my senior. I especially remember one such puzzle that featured a battle in space between death-ray-firing combatants: except for the bottom left corner, which looked like the moon, almost the entire puzzle was midnight blue with little points of white as stars...nearly impossible to do!
Almost eight years ago, back in March 2008, I wrote another blog article about jigsaw puzzles...here is a link to it [link]...
Putting together jigsaw puzzles is a fun activity I've enjoyed doing ever since I can remember...back when I was a little kid we would do some monster-size puzzles by spreading out the pieces on the floor (out of the way of foot traffic, of course) and it would be there for days, if not weeks, at a time...with anyone passing by welcome to work on it. Naturally, being much closer to the ground at the time than anyone else, I had a decided advantage over everyone in my family except my sister Anita, who is four years my senior. I especially remember one such puzzle that featured a battle in space between death-ray-firing combatants: except for the bottom left corner, which looked like the moon, almost the entire puzzle was midnight blue with little points of white as stars...nearly impossible to do!
Almost eight years ago, back in March 2008, I wrote another blog article about jigsaw puzzles...here is a link to it [link]...
Sunday, January 29, 2017
Reassessing Own Running Goals While Sidelined
I'm writing this at my local McDonalds...the one closest to my house...after having entered my favorite Starbucks at Magnolia Parke and, seeing no available seats and the long line of customers snaking around the back of the store to the door, got back into my car and drove around the corner to this place. I have grown to like iced coffee...the largest "venti" size that Starbucks offers, with tax, comes to $3.15 while I can get one here at Mickey D's for only $1.48: just as good, but without the long lines while enjoying plenty of seating space...and with free Wi-Fi to boot. Oh, and I think I forgot to mention that it's a lot quieter here as well, even factoring in the occasional loud child. Probably should have come here first...
It's approaching the end of January and, had things gone the way I had intended for them to go, I would now be in prime distance-running shape, having run the Ocala Half-Marathon a couple of weeks ago and the Newnans Lake 15K here in Gainesville yesterday...and would be gearing up for the FivePoints Half-Marathon, also held in town, in three weeks. Instead, I am recovering from the residual effects of an upper-respiratory infection I caught earlier in the month that produced a severe sore throat and a confounding residual cough due to scarring and sensitivity. I don't know how long it will be until all is healed, but this has really set back my running efforts considerably...no, I ran neither race in Ocala or Newnans Lake and it doesn't look as if I'll be ready to tackle that half-marathon course through Gainesville in three weeks. In short, I've been forced to sideline myself for a while from running. How long? I'll be surprised if, in a couple of weeks, I'm not ready to hit the road again...but forget about any racing until at least March...or maybe even later...
In the meantime, I've taken the time to assess where I'm at with my running and, considering my age (60), whether it might not be more advisable to expand my activities into bicycling and (fast)walking. The idea would be to alternate running with the bicycle on consecutive days, with a good, long walk for that odd seventh day of the week. It sounds like a reasonable course of action to take, and I could still run in the 5K-10K races that are more available here and which are spread out more throughout the year than are the longer distances. But first: rest, rest, and more rest!
It's approaching the end of January and, had things gone the way I had intended for them to go, I would now be in prime distance-running shape, having run the Ocala Half-Marathon a couple of weeks ago and the Newnans Lake 15K here in Gainesville yesterday...and would be gearing up for the FivePoints Half-Marathon, also held in town, in three weeks. Instead, I am recovering from the residual effects of an upper-respiratory infection I caught earlier in the month that produced a severe sore throat and a confounding residual cough due to scarring and sensitivity. I don't know how long it will be until all is healed, but this has really set back my running efforts considerably...no, I ran neither race in Ocala or Newnans Lake and it doesn't look as if I'll be ready to tackle that half-marathon course through Gainesville in three weeks. In short, I've been forced to sideline myself for a while from running. How long? I'll be surprised if, in a couple of weeks, I'm not ready to hit the road again...but forget about any racing until at least March...or maybe even later...
In the meantime, I've taken the time to assess where I'm at with my running and, considering my age (60), whether it might not be more advisable to expand my activities into bicycling and (fast)walking. The idea would be to alternate running with the bicycle on consecutive days, with a good, long walk for that odd seventh day of the week. It sounds like a reasonable course of action to take, and I could still run in the 5K-10K races that are more available here and which are spread out more throughout the year than are the longer distances. But first: rest, rest, and more rest!
Saturday, January 28, 2017
Yet More Elections (for Gainesville) in March
For all of you out there in my hometown of Gainesville, Florida trying to recover from the fatigue and trauma of last year's election season, I have some news: here comes another election! Yes, our fair city will be holding city commission elections for three of its seven seats this March 14, with the runoff elections (if a particular election doesn't produce a majority winner) on April 11. Early voting will be provided March 6-11 at the usual locations. There is an at-large seat covering the entire city and two districted seats (including my district). A commissioner's term of office is for three years and they cannot serve more than two terms. Todd Chase, my own district's commissioner, and whom I would have supported had his name been on the ballot, cannot run again due to term limits...so there looks to be a competitive campaign developing for his replacement. The at-large seat is currently occupied by Helen Warren, who is running for a second term. The other districted seat up for election is now held by Craig Carter, who is also running for reelection. I'll have to check into the candidates for the races that involve me in order to pick out the best ones for the job.
I really object to Gainesville holding commission elections like this in March, when the turnout is bound to be low. I've voted in a couple in the past when the registered voter participation was only 12%...how do they realistically expect the commission to be representative of its citizens when such a small fraction of the electorate put them into office? Of course, a great part of the problem is the apathy...and dare I say, laziness...of that electorate, even when polling places are designed to be close to their homes, voting hours on election day are very flexible (7 am to 7 pm), and early voting is also provided. It will be interesting to see whether, because of what happened nationally last November, people in this city of mine will be more willing to fulfill their civic duty as citizens and participate in the electoral process...
I really object to Gainesville holding commission elections like this in March, when the turnout is bound to be low. I've voted in a couple in the past when the registered voter participation was only 12%...how do they realistically expect the commission to be representative of its citizens when such a small fraction of the electorate put them into office? Of course, a great part of the problem is the apathy...and dare I say, laziness...of that electorate, even when polling places are designed to be close to their homes, voting hours on election day are very flexible (7 am to 7 pm), and early voting is also provided. It will be interesting to see whether, because of what happened nationally last November, people in this city of mine will be more willing to fulfill their civic duty as citizens and participate in the electoral process...
Friday, January 27, 2017
Quote of the Week...from Elie Wiesel
I write to understand as much as to be understood. ---Elie Wiesel.
Elie Wiesel, who died last year on July 2 at the age of 87, was probably the world's best known survivor of the Jewish Holocaust in World War II, having devoted the remainder of his life to educating the public about it and why it came about...and how to prevent it from ever happening again. In 1960 he came out with his book Night, which revealed his experiences as a teenager in the Auschwitz and Buchenwald Nazi concentration camps where he lost his sister and both of his parents...before finally being liberated at Buchenwald by the Americans on April 11, 1945. Unfortunately, there have been efforts from some quarters to deny that the Holocaust, responsible for the deaths of some six million European Jews, never happened. And there have tragically been other holocausts since then: in Cambodia, Rwanda, and Bosnia, to name just three. Wiesel is no longer with us, but we do have this day in history to continue to remind us of the Holocaust: since 2005, the United Nations has designated January 27, the date in 1945 when the Soviet Red Army liberated Auschwitz, as International Holocaust Remembrance Day...
I chose the above quote of Elie Wiesel because it resonates so strongly with me. Many times I sit down to write and initially feel a sense of inadequacy about what I plan to express, as if I don't know what I'm writing about. But in a way, this can impart a sense of freshness to my writing as I work out, both in my mind and by doing research, those areas about which I am lacking in knowledge and understanding. I think it was Stephen King who wrote something about how important it is to write about things you don't know. How many of us would rather stay quiet instead of risking others thinking that we were ignorant about something?
Elie Wiesel, who died last year on July 2 at the age of 87, was probably the world's best known survivor of the Jewish Holocaust in World War II, having devoted the remainder of his life to educating the public about it and why it came about...and how to prevent it from ever happening again. In 1960 he came out with his book Night, which revealed his experiences as a teenager in the Auschwitz and Buchenwald Nazi concentration camps where he lost his sister and both of his parents...before finally being liberated at Buchenwald by the Americans on April 11, 1945. Unfortunately, there have been efforts from some quarters to deny that the Holocaust, responsible for the deaths of some six million European Jews, never happened. And there have tragically been other holocausts since then: in Cambodia, Rwanda, and Bosnia, to name just three. Wiesel is no longer with us, but we do have this day in history to continue to remind us of the Holocaust: since 2005, the United Nations has designated January 27, the date in 1945 when the Soviet Red Army liberated Auschwitz, as International Holocaust Remembrance Day...
I chose the above quote of Elie Wiesel because it resonates so strongly with me. Many times I sit down to write and initially feel a sense of inadequacy about what I plan to express, as if I don't know what I'm writing about. But in a way, this can impart a sense of freshness to my writing as I work out, both in my mind and by doing research, those areas about which I am lacking in knowledge and understanding. I think it was Stephen King who wrote something about how important it is to write about things you don't know. How many of us would rather stay quiet instead of risking others thinking that we were ignorant about something?
Thursday, January 26, 2017
1/22 Sermon on the Life of Joseph, Part 2
This past Sunday at The Family Church in Gainesville, Pastor Philip Griffin delivered his second message in the ongoing series about the life of Joseph of the Old Testament, titled Upcycling: Trash to Treasure. In this message he used two scripture passages from Genesis, 37:12-36 and 39:1-6, appearing below in the New International Version by means of Bible Gateway:
12 Now his brothers had gone to graze their father’s flocks near Shechem, 13 and Israel said to Joseph, “As you know, your brothers are grazing the flocks near Shechem. Come, I am going to send you to them.”
“Very well,” he replied.
14 So he said to him, “Go and see if all is well with your brothers and with the flocks, and bring word back to me.” Then he sent him off from the Valley of Hebron.
When Joseph arrived at Shechem, 15 a man found him wandering around in the fields and asked him, “What are you looking for?”
16 He replied, “I’m looking for my brothers. Can you tell me where they are grazing their flocks?”
17 “They have moved on from here,” the man answered. “I heard them say, ‘Let’s go to Dothan.’”
So Joseph went after his brothers and found them near Dothan. 18 But they saw him in the distance, and before he reached them, they plotted to kill him.
19 “Here comes that dreamer!” they said to each other. 20 “Come now, let’s kill him and throw him into one of these cisterns and say that a ferocious animal devoured him. Then we’ll see what comes of his dreams.”
21 When Reuben heard this, he tried to rescue him from their hands. “Let’s not take his life,” he said. 22 “Don’t shed any blood. Throw him into this cistern here in the wilderness, but don’t lay a hand on him.” Reuben said this to rescue him from them and take him back to his father.
23 So when Joseph came to his brothers, they stripped him of his robe—the ornate robe he was wearing— 24 and they took him and threw him into the cistern. The cistern was empty; there was no water in it.
25 As they sat down to eat their meal, they looked up and saw a caravan of Ishmaelites coming from Gilead. Their camels were loaded with spices, balm and myrrh, and they were on their way to take them down to Egypt.
26 Judah said to his brothers, “What will we gain if we kill our brother and cover up his blood? 27 Come, let’s sell him to the Ishmaelites and not lay our hands on him; after all, he is our brother, our own flesh and blood.” His brothers agreed.
28 So when the Midianite merchants came by, his brothers pulled Joseph up out of the cistern and sold him for twenty shekels of silver to the Ishmaelites, who took him to Egypt.
29 When Reuben returned to the cistern and saw that Joseph was not there, he tore his clothes. 30 He went back to his brothers and said, “The boy isn’t there! Where can I turn now?”
31 Then they got Joseph’s robe, slaughtered a goat and dipped the robe in the blood. 32 They took the ornate robe back to their father and said, “We found this. Examine it to see whether it is your son’s robe.”
33 He recognized it and said, “It is my son’s robe! Some ferocious animal has devoured him. Joseph has surely been torn to pieces.”
34 Then Jacob tore his clothes, put on sackcloth and mourned for his son many days. 35 All his sons and daughters came to comfort him, but he refused to be comforted. “No,” he said, “I will continue to mourn until I join my son in the grave.” So his father wept for him.
36 Meanwhile, the Midianites sold Joseph in Egypt to Potiphar, one of Pharaoh’s officials, the captain of the guard.
1 Now Joseph had been taken down to Egypt. Potiphar, an Egyptian who was one of Pharaoh’s officials, the captain of the guard, bought him from the Ishmaelites who had taken him there.
2 The Lord was with Joseph so that he prospered, and he lived in the house of his Egyptian master. 3 When his master saw that the Lord was with him and that the Lord gave him success in everything he did, 4 Joseph found favor in his eyes and became his attendant. Potiphar put him in charge of his household, and he entrusted to his care everything he owned. 5 From the time he put him in charge of his household and of all that he owned, the Lord blessed the household of the Egyptian because of Joseph. The blessing of the Lord was on everything Potiphar had, both in the house and in the field. 6 So Potiphar left everything he had in Joseph’s care; with Joseph in charge, he did not concern himself with anything except the food he ate.
Now Joseph was well-built and handsome...
Pastor Griffin continued to describe inherited prisons that people find themselves confined to in their lives, prisons that if not recognized and liberated from are in danger of being passed on to the next generation and beyond. He listed three more types: rejection, betrayal, and deception. The older brothers of Joseph lived in constant rejection from their father Jacob in favor of Joseph. They themselves then rejected Joseph as their brother and then went on to betrayal, as they seized him, initially intending to kill him but eventually selling their younger brother off to slavery for a bag of silver. Again, this is generational: Jacob betrayed Esau, the family's first-born, out of his inheritance. Also, Pastor Philip pointed out the similarity between the brothers' betrayal of Joseph and that of Judas against Jesus...both for some silver coins. Finally there is deception here: the brothers deceived Jacob that Joseph had been killed by a wild beast...Jacob many years earlier had deceived his father Isaac by pretending he was his brother when the inheritance was given. So it seems that these "prisons" of rejection, betrayal, and deception are all interrelated and are symptoms of dysfunctionality in relationships...
But Joseph broke free of the bondage of these generational prisons, as the second passage illustrates, by placing his trust in God and not his circumstances...especially those circumstances resulting from rejection, betrayal, and deception. He chose to be different and not a passive victim of his situation. We can also choose to be different and break free from our own prisons. I can relate strongly to this message as I very clearly remember the figurative prisons I was forced to live in as a child and with which I am still in a state of struggle...long after the circumstances and people that defined them have all gone. I have a feeling that a lot of us are in the same boat, with just the details differing among us...
The Family Church is located at 2022 SW 122nd Street and holds its Sunday morning services at 9:30 and 11. They also have family and discipleship groups, and the praise music during the services...along with the complimentary coffee they provide...is tops. If you can't attend but would like to hear the morning message, they have a YouTube video channel...here is a link to it: [link]...
12 Now his brothers had gone to graze their father’s flocks near Shechem, 13 and Israel said to Joseph, “As you know, your brothers are grazing the flocks near Shechem. Come, I am going to send you to them.”
“Very well,” he replied.
14 So he said to him, “Go and see if all is well with your brothers and with the flocks, and bring word back to me.” Then he sent him off from the Valley of Hebron.
When Joseph arrived at Shechem, 15 a man found him wandering around in the fields and asked him, “What are you looking for?”
16 He replied, “I’m looking for my brothers. Can you tell me where they are grazing their flocks?”
17 “They have moved on from here,” the man answered. “I heard them say, ‘Let’s go to Dothan.’”
So Joseph went after his brothers and found them near Dothan. 18 But they saw him in the distance, and before he reached them, they plotted to kill him.
19 “Here comes that dreamer!” they said to each other. 20 “Come now, let’s kill him and throw him into one of these cisterns and say that a ferocious animal devoured him. Then we’ll see what comes of his dreams.”
21 When Reuben heard this, he tried to rescue him from their hands. “Let’s not take his life,” he said. 22 “Don’t shed any blood. Throw him into this cistern here in the wilderness, but don’t lay a hand on him.” Reuben said this to rescue him from them and take him back to his father.
23 So when Joseph came to his brothers, they stripped him of his robe—the ornate robe he was wearing— 24 and they took him and threw him into the cistern. The cistern was empty; there was no water in it.
25 As they sat down to eat their meal, they looked up and saw a caravan of Ishmaelites coming from Gilead. Their camels were loaded with spices, balm and myrrh, and they were on their way to take them down to Egypt.
26 Judah said to his brothers, “What will we gain if we kill our brother and cover up his blood? 27 Come, let’s sell him to the Ishmaelites and not lay our hands on him; after all, he is our brother, our own flesh and blood.” His brothers agreed.
28 So when the Midianite merchants came by, his brothers pulled Joseph up out of the cistern and sold him for twenty shekels of silver to the Ishmaelites, who took him to Egypt.
29 When Reuben returned to the cistern and saw that Joseph was not there, he tore his clothes. 30 He went back to his brothers and said, “The boy isn’t there! Where can I turn now?”
31 Then they got Joseph’s robe, slaughtered a goat and dipped the robe in the blood. 32 They took the ornate robe back to their father and said, “We found this. Examine it to see whether it is your son’s robe.”
33 He recognized it and said, “It is my son’s robe! Some ferocious animal has devoured him. Joseph has surely been torn to pieces.”
34 Then Jacob tore his clothes, put on sackcloth and mourned for his son many days. 35 All his sons and daughters came to comfort him, but he refused to be comforted. “No,” he said, “I will continue to mourn until I join my son in the grave.” So his father wept for him.
36 Meanwhile, the Midianites sold Joseph in Egypt to Potiphar, one of Pharaoh’s officials, the captain of the guard.
1 Now Joseph had been taken down to Egypt. Potiphar, an Egyptian who was one of Pharaoh’s officials, the captain of the guard, bought him from the Ishmaelites who had taken him there.
2 The Lord was with Joseph so that he prospered, and he lived in the house of his Egyptian master. 3 When his master saw that the Lord was with him and that the Lord gave him success in everything he did, 4 Joseph found favor in his eyes and became his attendant. Potiphar put him in charge of his household, and he entrusted to his care everything he owned. 5 From the time he put him in charge of his household and of all that he owned, the Lord blessed the household of the Egyptian because of Joseph. The blessing of the Lord was on everything Potiphar had, both in the house and in the field. 6 So Potiphar left everything he had in Joseph’s care; with Joseph in charge, he did not concern himself with anything except the food he ate.
Now Joseph was well-built and handsome...
Pastor Griffin continued to describe inherited prisons that people find themselves confined to in their lives, prisons that if not recognized and liberated from are in danger of being passed on to the next generation and beyond. He listed three more types: rejection, betrayal, and deception. The older brothers of Joseph lived in constant rejection from their father Jacob in favor of Joseph. They themselves then rejected Joseph as their brother and then went on to betrayal, as they seized him, initially intending to kill him but eventually selling their younger brother off to slavery for a bag of silver. Again, this is generational: Jacob betrayed Esau, the family's first-born, out of his inheritance. Also, Pastor Philip pointed out the similarity between the brothers' betrayal of Joseph and that of Judas against Jesus...both for some silver coins. Finally there is deception here: the brothers deceived Jacob that Joseph had been killed by a wild beast...Jacob many years earlier had deceived his father Isaac by pretending he was his brother when the inheritance was given. So it seems that these "prisons" of rejection, betrayal, and deception are all interrelated and are symptoms of dysfunctionality in relationships...
But Joseph broke free of the bondage of these generational prisons, as the second passage illustrates, by placing his trust in God and not his circumstances...especially those circumstances resulting from rejection, betrayal, and deception. He chose to be different and not a passive victim of his situation. We can also choose to be different and break free from our own prisons. I can relate strongly to this message as I very clearly remember the figurative prisons I was forced to live in as a child and with which I am still in a state of struggle...long after the circumstances and people that defined them have all gone. I have a feeling that a lot of us are in the same boat, with just the details differing among us...
The Family Church is located at 2022 SW 122nd Street and holds its Sunday morning services at 9:30 and 11. They also have family and discipleship groups, and the praise music during the services...along with the complimentary coffee they provide...is tops. If you can't attend but would like to hear the morning message, they have a YouTube video channel...here is a link to it: [link]...
Wednesday, January 25, 2017
Senate Democrats in a Bind Over 2018 Election
The Democrats in the United States Senate have a problem: already at a 48 to 52-seat disadvantage with the majority Republicans and a new GOP president with a strong conservative agenda, they want to do what the Republicans did to Obama: obstruct, obstruct, obstruct. But 2009 was a different year from 2017: out of the Senate seats up for election in 2018, 25 are currently held by Democrats...and only 8 by Republicans. As many as 11 of them could well flip over to the Republicans, according to politico.com: Heitkamp-North Dakota, Tester-Montana, Manchin-West Virginia, Donnelly-Indiana, McCaskill-Missouri, Heller-Nevada, Brown-Ohio, Casey-Pennsylvania, Baldwin-Wisconsin, and Nelson-Florida...only Heller is from a state that went against Donald Trump in 2016. And many of these are from solidly red states like North Dakota, Montana, West Virginia, Indiana, and Missouri. If current Florida governor Rick Scott decides to run against Bill Nelson in 2018, the odds for the latter's reelection will dwindle as well. And the Republicans can win a filibuster-proof 60-seat supermajority if they hold their own seats and win over 8 of the 25 seats held by Democrats...
Now I realize that there is a chance that the Trump administration's actions over the next couple of years may backfire and his popularity nosedive among some of those who had voted for him, putting the Democrats strongly on the offensive, but I'm not counting on it. Instead, if the Democrats in the Senate hold together as a caucus and prevent the president's agenda from being fully carried out...and that includes his nominees to various posts, including the Supreme Court...those aforementioned vulnerable candidates may have even more difficulty being reelected. And that's why I'm of the persuasion that some of them will break with Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and support more of the Republican issues and nominees than they would have under different circumstances. Whether I'm right or not should soon become clear, after President Trump announces his choice next week to replace the late Justice Scalia for the U.S. Supreme Court...
Now I realize that there is a chance that the Trump administration's actions over the next couple of years may backfire and his popularity nosedive among some of those who had voted for him, putting the Democrats strongly on the offensive, but I'm not counting on it. Instead, if the Democrats in the Senate hold together as a caucus and prevent the president's agenda from being fully carried out...and that includes his nominees to various posts, including the Supreme Court...those aforementioned vulnerable candidates may have even more difficulty being reelected. And that's why I'm of the persuasion that some of them will break with Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and support more of the Republican issues and nominees than they would have under different circumstances. Whether I'm right or not should soon become clear, after President Trump announces his choice next week to replace the late Justice Scalia for the U.S. Supreme Court...
Tuesday, January 24, 2017
Rep. Mulvaney's Senate Hearing for Budget Director
This morning I was watching on C-Span the Senate hearing for Trump's Budget Director nominee, Republican Representative Mick Mulvaney of South Carolina...appropriately conducted by the Budget Committee. Mulvaney is a Tea Party conservative who entered Congress on that movement's popular momentum in the elections of 2010. He is described as a hawk on fiscal restraint and has expressed concern about the federal government's ability to financially make ends meet in the not-to-distant future. These concerns were repeated during today's hearing as Rep. Mulvaney mentioned that the trust funds for Medicare and Social Security would dry up in nine and seventeen years, respectively, if nothing were done about them. And that, if nothing is done to change our spending practices, the entire federal spending would be going to paying the interest from our accumulated national debt and nothing else by around 2044 or 2054. So how does one go about fixing things? The nominee explained that there are five "levers" in Social Security that could be pulled in small degrees that, when done together, would make a major difference in the program's total cost, including things like raising the minimum age and imposing income caps for receiving benefits, to mention a couple. The panel also asked Rep. Mulvaney about Donald Trump's repeated avowals during the campaign that he would not cut either Medicare and Social Security, and how would that square off against the nominee's views in favor of reform...after all, hadn't he once described the Social Security system as a "ponzi scheme"? Mulvaney pointed out that the troubles with these programs have intensified because the ratio of people paying into the system to those receiving benefits has drastically gone down...now it's 2:1 and continuing to dwindle...and that is what's making it unsustainable, especially as the massive baby boomer generation ages and goes into retirement. Also, people's increasing life expectancy, while generally speaking is a great thing, at the same time is placing a much heavier burden on Medicare and Social Security...
I just turned sixty last October and my wife is just a few years behind me, so we are very much concerned with what will happen with Medicare and Social Security during the next few years. Everyone agrees, both Democrat and Republican, that something needs to be done...but the latter have pretty much forsaken the notion of raising taxes in order to adequately maintain their funding. I'll continue to follow how these programs are changed over this Republican-controlled Congress and Presidency. I will say that Mick Mulvaney did an excellent job of presenting and expressing himself...although the committee's ranking member Senator Bernie Sanders described him as being "out of touch" with his views, he also complimented him by calling him a "straight shooter". With the amount of "alternative facts" being pushed by the new administration, this is refreshing to hear...
I just turned sixty last October and my wife is just a few years behind me, so we are very much concerned with what will happen with Medicare and Social Security during the next few years. Everyone agrees, both Democrat and Republican, that something needs to be done...but the latter have pretty much forsaken the notion of raising taxes in order to adequately maintain their funding. I'll continue to follow how these programs are changed over this Republican-controlled Congress and Presidency. I will say that Mick Mulvaney did an excellent job of presenting and expressing himself...although the committee's ranking member Senator Bernie Sanders described him as being "out of touch" with his views, he also complimented him by calling him a "straight shooter". With the amount of "alternative facts" being pushed by the new administration, this is refreshing to hear...
Monday, January 23, 2017
Starting to Study About Federal Spending
Now that the new Congress is in session...along with the new administration...they are beginning to get down to crunching numbers and deciding how to spend our dollars...hopefully on our behalf. Federal spending is an area that I admit to being pretty ignorant about...but that's about to change, for I am embarking on a self-education project over this extremely important subject. You see, I have watched countless floor speeches over the years (using the C-Span channels) in both the U.S. Senate and House, as well as different committee hearings when they are debating legislation designed to direct money to different areas. But rhetoric in of itself, while helpful in sorting out our priorities and values, does little to address the actual problem of making the numbers all fit together into a cohesive national fiscal policy that works both for the country at large and its individual citizens. Therefore, I'm combing the Internet to try to make sense of it all. One site I found seemed helpful for a novice like me: https://www.nationalpriorities.org/budget-basics/federal-budget-101/spending/, which explains basics about our federal budget, distinguishing between discretionary and mandatory spending and showing, in general terms using pie charts, where the money is going...or I should say went, in 2015...
Of course, federal spending is only one half of the process: after all, there must be revenue collection in order to be able to spend all that money, as well as a borrowing process that can account for deficit spending. I'm going to look into all these areas...because I no longer feel comfortable just sitting there listening to my elected officials twisting around the English language in order to persuade each other...and you and me...to their positions. I want a solid background and understanding on the topic...and to be able to discern when someone is speaking correctly to the point or is engaging in demagoguery or...using a newly coined term I'm starting to hear lately, employing "alternative facts", which to me just sounds like a fancy way of saying "lies"...
Of course, as I learn more and more about how our government goes about its fiscal policies, I'll share some of it on this blog. And who knows, maybe some of you out there can help me to better understand this complex matter...
Of course, federal spending is only one half of the process: after all, there must be revenue collection in order to be able to spend all that money, as well as a borrowing process that can account for deficit spending. I'm going to look into all these areas...because I no longer feel comfortable just sitting there listening to my elected officials twisting around the English language in order to persuade each other...and you and me...to their positions. I want a solid background and understanding on the topic...and to be able to discern when someone is speaking correctly to the point or is engaging in demagoguery or...using a newly coined term I'm starting to hear lately, employing "alternative facts", which to me just sounds like a fancy way of saying "lies"...
Of course, as I learn more and more about how our government goes about its fiscal policies, I'll share some of it on this blog. And who knows, maybe some of you out there can help me to better understand this complex matter...
Sunday, January 22, 2017
Severe Thunderstorm Sweeping Into Gainesville Area
It has been forecast for days, and finally it looks as if the Gainesville area is in for some severe weather. A squall line is nearing us as I write, around 6 pm, and should soon pass through. The above photo has been typical for today: fast-moving low-lying clouds with very gusty winds and sporadic rain. It should be interesting to see how severe this storm will be...they are predicting more for us this evening as well. A tornado watch is also in effect and there is supposedly a danger of large hail. Well, I guess it's about showtime...
Saturday, January 21, 2017
Some Sports and Political Comments
I'm currently watching a Mexican Liga MX (premier league) soccer game between my team, the Universidad Autonoma de Nueva Leon Tigres, and Club America...a regular season rematch of the championship finale that took place last month and which gave the Tigres an exciting, come-from-behind win on the penalty shoot-out. Right now the Tigres are in the lead 2-1 at halftime, and I am very impressed by the accurate passing and intensity of play by both teams. Earlier today I saw the ending to an English Premier League match between Stoke City and Manchester United. Stoke City was almost assured a 1-0 win when, with only a minute or two to go, they fouled Manchester United, whose star striker Wayne Rooney then directly scored on a distant free kick. That impressive, improbable goal gave him the all-time record for career goals with that club. So I've been enjoying this day off watching some good pro soccer. And then there's what is going on in the news...
All across the country...and the world, for that matter...there are mass demonstrations protesting the beginning of Donald Trump's presidency...most of them are focused on this individual's alleged abusive behavior toward women and his many disparaging, sexist public statements...even during the presidential campaign. And this Republican Congress has apparently decided to do just what they accused the Democrats in 2009 of doing when they held the Presidency and both Houses of Congress: ram through a whole slew of controversial, divisive legislation without any efforts to reach across the aisle to form a consensus. As I recall, nationwide there was a strong negative reaction eight years ago...in the form of the Tea Party Movement...and the Republicans took back the House of Representatives in the following year's elections. I see something similar again happening this time around, with only the party names switched...
On Monday the U.S. Senate should be holding floor confirmation votes for some positions...the most controversial is for Secretary of State nominee Rex Tillerson, the former Exxon-Mobile CEO who has been called to task for defying American sanctions against Russia and negotiating a lucrative deal with that country for his company. Republican Florida senator Marco Rubio garnered my respect for pointing out the atrocities committed under the watch of Vladimir Putin and for criticizing Tillerson during the committee hearing last week...I wonder whether he will stick to his principles and vote "no" on Monday...or wimp out and go along with his party, as I suspect he will do in the end...
And I couldn't finish this article without mentioning the two National Football League conference championship games taking place tomorrow. The National Conference title game pits Green Bay at Atlanta while in the American Conference New England hosts Pittsburgh. I like both the Falcons and Packers...I just hope it's a close, entertaining game like that great Green Bay win over Dallas last week. In the other contest, I'm going to figuratively hold my nose for three hours and pull for the Steelers, a team that I almost always oppose...but they're playing the Patriots, featuring the Sith Lord and Darth Vader in the persons of Bill Belichick and Tom Brady, respectively. Another Patriots Super Bowl win is simply unacceptable to me...
All across the country...and the world, for that matter...there are mass demonstrations protesting the beginning of Donald Trump's presidency...most of them are focused on this individual's alleged abusive behavior toward women and his many disparaging, sexist public statements...even during the presidential campaign. And this Republican Congress has apparently decided to do just what they accused the Democrats in 2009 of doing when they held the Presidency and both Houses of Congress: ram through a whole slew of controversial, divisive legislation without any efforts to reach across the aisle to form a consensus. As I recall, nationwide there was a strong negative reaction eight years ago...in the form of the Tea Party Movement...and the Republicans took back the House of Representatives in the following year's elections. I see something similar again happening this time around, with only the party names switched...
On Monday the U.S. Senate should be holding floor confirmation votes for some positions...the most controversial is for Secretary of State nominee Rex Tillerson, the former Exxon-Mobile CEO who has been called to task for defying American sanctions against Russia and negotiating a lucrative deal with that country for his company. Republican Florida senator Marco Rubio garnered my respect for pointing out the atrocities committed under the watch of Vladimir Putin and for criticizing Tillerson during the committee hearing last week...I wonder whether he will stick to his principles and vote "no" on Monday...or wimp out and go along with his party, as I suspect he will do in the end...
And I couldn't finish this article without mentioning the two National Football League conference championship games taking place tomorrow. The National Conference title game pits Green Bay at Atlanta while in the American Conference New England hosts Pittsburgh. I like both the Falcons and Packers...I just hope it's a close, entertaining game like that great Green Bay win over Dallas last week. In the other contest, I'm going to figuratively hold my nose for three hours and pull for the Steelers, a team that I almost always oppose...but they're playing the Patriots, featuring the Sith Lord and Darth Vader in the persons of Bill Belichick and Tom Brady, respectively. Another Patriots Super Bowl win is simply unacceptable to me...
Friday, January 20, 2017
Quote of the Week...from Robert Frost
Always fall in with what you're asked to accept. Take what is given, and make it over your way. My aim in life has always been to hold my own with whatever's going. Not against: with.
---Robert Frost.
Robert Frost was perhaps the best known American poet of the twentieth century...I always appreciated his "road less traveled by" line. The above quote of his, however, runs against much of the accepted thinking of this day as people are encouraged to be defiant in the face of challenges and resistant to compromise. I agree with this to the extent that one needs to hold to his or her own beliefs and not dilute them in order to accommodate others. But there comes a point where I need to accept the circumstances I find myself in whether they are what I would have wanted...or something entirely different...
Take this past presidential election as an example. I'm sitting here right now watching the inauguration of the winner, Donald Trump. I did not support him and continue to have strong reservations about him as my president. But that's what he is now: my president...and as such we are bound together for this season in our respective lives. I want him to succeed in defending this country and upholding the Constitution, while at the same time will most likely stand in loyal opposition to some of his decisions...and I have every intention of writing about them. So whatever happens with this president, I for myself plan to "hold my own"...but here we are and I think it's finally about time we need to "take what is given" and make it over our way...
---Robert Frost.
Robert Frost was perhaps the best known American poet of the twentieth century...I always appreciated his "road less traveled by" line. The above quote of his, however, runs against much of the accepted thinking of this day as people are encouraged to be defiant in the face of challenges and resistant to compromise. I agree with this to the extent that one needs to hold to his or her own beliefs and not dilute them in order to accommodate others. But there comes a point where I need to accept the circumstances I find myself in whether they are what I would have wanted...or something entirely different...
Take this past presidential election as an example. I'm sitting here right now watching the inauguration of the winner, Donald Trump. I did not support him and continue to have strong reservations about him as my president. But that's what he is now: my president...and as such we are bound together for this season in our respective lives. I want him to succeed in defending this country and upholding the Constitution, while at the same time will most likely stand in loyal opposition to some of his decisions...and I have every intention of writing about them. So whatever happens with this president, I for myself plan to "hold my own"...but here we are and I think it's finally about time we need to "take what is given" and make it over our way...
Thursday, January 19, 2017
1/15 Sermon on the Life of Joseph, Part 1
The Family Church here in Gainesville has begun a new Sunday morning message series during its services that our pastor, Philip Griffin has titled Upcycling: Trash to Treasure, examining the life of Joseph from the Old Testament book of Genesis and the lessons we can learn from his experiences and example. Last Sunday's Biblical text of focus was Genesis 37:1-11, shown here in the New International Version via the Bible Gateway website:
5 Joseph had a dream, and when he told it to his brothers, they hated him all the more. 6 He said to them, “Listen to this dream I had: 7 We were binding sheaves of grain out in the field when suddenly my sheaf rose and stood upright, while your sheaves gathered around mine and bowed down to it.”
8 His brothers said to him, “Do you intend to reign over us? Will you actually rule us?” And they hated him all the more because of his dream and what he had said.
9 Then he had another dream, and he told it to his brothers. “Listen,” he said, “I had another dream, and this time the sun and moon and eleven stars were bowing down to me.”
10 When he told his father as well as his brothers, his father rebuked him and said, “What is this dream you had? Will your mother and I and your brothers actually come and bow down to the ground before you?” 11 His brothers were jealous of him, but his father kept the matter in mind.
Pastor Philip used the above passage to illustrate what he presented as three kinds of prisons that can disrupt relationships and subjugate people: abandonment, favoritism, and hatred. Jacob, who strongly favored Joseph over his many older brothers and had essentially abandoned his own family through his passive withdrawal from his responsibilities as father and husband, himself received favoritism over his brother Esau from his father Isaac...and Isaac himself was preferred by his own father Abraham over his brother Ishmael...so these "prisons" can thus be passed down from one generation to the next. And when favoritism exists, the favored can form a sense of entitlement while those disfavored can foster resentment...and ultimately, hatred...
How does one break out of dysfunctional prisons from his or her own past...or from ongoing relationships as well? A clue is given in an earlier passage in Genesis (29:17, 31-35) as it pertains to Leah, Jacob's first wife, whom he treated with contempt...in sharp contrast to his preferred wife Rachel:
17 Leah had weak eyes, but Rachel had a lovely figure and was beautiful.
31 When the Lord saw that Leah was not loved, he enabled her to conceive, but Rachel remained childless. 32 Leah became pregnant and gave birth to a son. She named him Reuben, for she said, “It is because the Lord has seen my misery. Surely my husband will love me now.”
33 She conceived again, and when she gave birth to a son she said, “Because the Lord heard that I am not loved, he gave me this one too.” So she named him Simeon.
34 Again she conceived, and when she gave birth to a son she said, “Now at last my husband will become attached to me, because I have borne him three sons.” So he was named Levi.
35 She conceived again, and when she gave birth to a son she said, “This time I will praise the Lord.” So she named him Judah. Then she stopped having children.
The lesson is clear: Leah eventually stopped depending on approval from others, in this case her husband Jacob, and instead placed her faith and hopes in God...and then she found peace. It is indeed a rough road to go down in life if you find yourself unfairly treated with disdain in favor of others...I've certainly felt this in a number of contexts over the course of my life...maybe I'll write about this some time in the future in a different article. The road is even rougher, though, if you invest your own sense of worth in whether or not others approve of you...seeking "justice" in this way is bound to be frustrating and can well lead to resentment and hatred as Pastor Griffin pointed out with his Biblical examples. Instead, place your confidence in the Lord and discover peace in his approval...
Here is a link to this sermon on the church's YouTube video website: [link]...
37 Jacob lived in the land where his father had stayed, the land of Canaan.
2 This is the account of Jacob’s family line. Joseph, a young man of seventeen, was tending the flocks with his brothers, the sons of Bilhah and the sons of Zilpah, his father’s wives, and he brought their father a bad report about them.
3 Now Israel loved Joseph more than any of his other sons, because he had been born to him in his old age; and he made an ornate robe for him. 4 When his brothers saw that their father loved him more than any of them, they hated him and could not speak a kind word to him.5 Joseph had a dream, and when he told it to his brothers, they hated him all the more. 6 He said to them, “Listen to this dream I had: 7 We were binding sheaves of grain out in the field when suddenly my sheaf rose and stood upright, while your sheaves gathered around mine and bowed down to it.”
8 His brothers said to him, “Do you intend to reign over us? Will you actually rule us?” And they hated him all the more because of his dream and what he had said.
9 Then he had another dream, and he told it to his brothers. “Listen,” he said, “I had another dream, and this time the sun and moon and eleven stars were bowing down to me.”
10 When he told his father as well as his brothers, his father rebuked him and said, “What is this dream you had? Will your mother and I and your brothers actually come and bow down to the ground before you?” 11 His brothers were jealous of him, but his father kept the matter in mind.
Pastor Philip used the above passage to illustrate what he presented as three kinds of prisons that can disrupt relationships and subjugate people: abandonment, favoritism, and hatred. Jacob, who strongly favored Joseph over his many older brothers and had essentially abandoned his own family through his passive withdrawal from his responsibilities as father and husband, himself received favoritism over his brother Esau from his father Isaac...and Isaac himself was preferred by his own father Abraham over his brother Ishmael...so these "prisons" can thus be passed down from one generation to the next. And when favoritism exists, the favored can form a sense of entitlement while those disfavored can foster resentment...and ultimately, hatred...
How does one break out of dysfunctional prisons from his or her own past...or from ongoing relationships as well? A clue is given in an earlier passage in Genesis (29:17, 31-35) as it pertains to Leah, Jacob's first wife, whom he treated with contempt...in sharp contrast to his preferred wife Rachel:
17 Leah had weak eyes, but Rachel had a lovely figure and was beautiful.
31 When the Lord saw that Leah was not loved, he enabled her to conceive, but Rachel remained childless. 32 Leah became pregnant and gave birth to a son. She named him Reuben, for she said, “It is because the Lord has seen my misery. Surely my husband will love me now.”
33 She conceived again, and when she gave birth to a son she said, “Because the Lord heard that I am not loved, he gave me this one too.” So she named him Simeon.
34 Again she conceived, and when she gave birth to a son she said, “Now at last my husband will become attached to me, because I have borne him three sons.” So he was named Levi.
35 She conceived again, and when she gave birth to a son she said, “This time I will praise the Lord.” So she named him Judah. Then she stopped having children.
The lesson is clear: Leah eventually stopped depending on approval from others, in this case her husband Jacob, and instead placed her faith and hopes in God...and then she found peace. It is indeed a rough road to go down in life if you find yourself unfairly treated with disdain in favor of others...I've certainly felt this in a number of contexts over the course of my life...maybe I'll write about this some time in the future in a different article. The road is even rougher, though, if you invest your own sense of worth in whether or not others approve of you...seeking "justice" in this way is bound to be frustrating and can well lead to resentment and hatred as Pastor Griffin pointed out with his Biblical examples. Instead, place your confidence in the Lord and discover peace in his approval...
Here is a link to this sermon on the church's YouTube video website: [link]...
Wednesday, January 18, 2017
Neil DeGrasse Tyson's Profound Twitter Post
I was looking at Twitter today and, following the announcement of the death of Gene Cernan, the last human being to stand on the moon, noticed that famous astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson had posted something pretty profound:
In 1927 Lindbergh flew from NY to Paris. 45 yrs later, in 1972 we last walked on the Moon. 45 yrs later, in 2017 we… we… we...
Truth be told, we have done nothing to push back the frontiers of human space exploration since President Nixon had curtailed the Apollo moon program to only six landings...other than low Earth-orbit projects like the Space Shuttle and the International Space Station or by the use of unmanned, remotely controlled probes. The irony of all this is that Spiro Agnew, Nixon's vice-president, at the time seemed to be very excited about the space program, once predicting that we would reach Mars by 1989. But it wasn't until several presidents later, with the administration of George W. Bush, that serious efforts were undertaken to plan and build a return mission to the moon, as an intermediary step to go to Mars and beyond. Yet soon after Barack Obama became president, he scrapped Bush's moon plans...sarcastically (and foolishly) stating that "we've already been there"...and laid out a different personal vision of where HE wanted the country to go...asteroids and eventually Mars, using private companies and leaning on Russia to help us with space launches for several years. And I think you're seeing where the main problem regarding NASA and our manned space program lies. NASA is a government agency in the executive branch, and the president has direct control over its priorities and projects. So with each new president comes a different emphasis and very little continuity of vision and mission...
Tyson's tweet accurately puts it all out there: from 1927 to 1972 our frontiers went from the first transatlantic plane flight to the last of six moon landings...and in the 45 years since then we haven't even kept what we had accomplished, instead now barely able to even get out of our own atmosphere. And now here we go again with a new incoming president who, I'm confident, will once again "reset" the agenda for NASA in a different direction from his predecessor's. I don't see much hope of getting out of this rut as long as our space program remains the private football of the sitting president, to kick around however he or she sees fit. In the meantime, we can always count on our good, dependable friends the Russians to help us out, right?
In 1927 Lindbergh flew from NY to Paris. 45 yrs later, in 1972 we last walked on the Moon. 45 yrs later, in 2017 we… we… we...
Truth be told, we have done nothing to push back the frontiers of human space exploration since President Nixon had curtailed the Apollo moon program to only six landings...other than low Earth-orbit projects like the Space Shuttle and the International Space Station or by the use of unmanned, remotely controlled probes. The irony of all this is that Spiro Agnew, Nixon's vice-president, at the time seemed to be very excited about the space program, once predicting that we would reach Mars by 1989. But it wasn't until several presidents later, with the administration of George W. Bush, that serious efforts were undertaken to plan and build a return mission to the moon, as an intermediary step to go to Mars and beyond. Yet soon after Barack Obama became president, he scrapped Bush's moon plans...sarcastically (and foolishly) stating that "we've already been there"...and laid out a different personal vision of where HE wanted the country to go...asteroids and eventually Mars, using private companies and leaning on Russia to help us with space launches for several years. And I think you're seeing where the main problem regarding NASA and our manned space program lies. NASA is a government agency in the executive branch, and the president has direct control over its priorities and projects. So with each new president comes a different emphasis and very little continuity of vision and mission...
Tyson's tweet accurately puts it all out there: from 1927 to 1972 our frontiers went from the first transatlantic plane flight to the last of six moon landings...and in the 45 years since then we haven't even kept what we had accomplished, instead now barely able to even get out of our own atmosphere. And now here we go again with a new incoming president who, I'm confident, will once again "reset" the agenda for NASA in a different direction from his predecessor's. I don't see much hope of getting out of this rut as long as our space program remains the private football of the sitting president, to kick around however he or she sees fit. In the meantime, we can always count on our good, dependable friends the Russians to help us out, right?
Tuesday, January 17, 2017
Extreme Cynicism Equals Extreme Gullibility
How do you con someone to support you, either by them giving you their money, their vote, or adopting your cause? I would answer, after having witnessed numerous examples of successful confidence schemes in the media, marketplace, and politics over the years, that first you need to establish that whatever you're promoting is outside the realm of the "establishment"...the forces that be per se...and that "they" not only cannot be trusted, but also are in opposition to your own agenda...which of course is only for the greater good and "truth". This goes for selling alternative health food/supplements, claims about alien abductions/Roswell/chemtrails/bigfoot/ancient aliens/etcetera, denial of established science about evolution, ecology, and/or climatology, conspiracy theories such as Truthers, Birthers, and those with an anti-Semitic foundation, historical revisionism....and what the current president-elect, a fixture of the financial elite establishment for decades, has managed to accomplish by identifying himself as coming from "outside" that establishment in favor for the ordinary citizen. To be suckered into following any of the aforementioned requires in advance a cynical rejection of established norms and an accompanying uncritical gullibility in favor of alternatives...as far-fetched and distant from believability and accountability as they may be...
I might also add that this cynicism/gullibility dualism is not just a phenomenon of America or the Western world. I see this in the Islamic culture as well, where some people raised in the Muslim faith will cynically reject the well-developed, stable social structure within that society in favor of jumping uncritically into violent Jihadism, meekly buying into whatever lies their new masters tell them. So cynicism and gullibility going hand-in-hand is not culture-centered...it probably spans all of humanity. But I never hear anyone discussing it...what do you think?
I might also add that this cynicism/gullibility dualism is not just a phenomenon of America or the Western world. I see this in the Islamic culture as well, where some people raised in the Muslim faith will cynically reject the well-developed, stable social structure within that society in favor of jumping uncritically into violent Jihadism, meekly buying into whatever lies their new masters tell them. So cynicism and gullibility going hand-in-hand is not culture-centered...it probably spans all of humanity. But I never hear anyone discussing it...what do you think?
Monday, January 16, 2017
Second Week of Trump Cabinet Nominee Hearings in US Senate
President-elect Donald Trump's picks for his Cabinet continue their confirmation hearings in the United States Senate this week, with the Senate committee appropriate to the Cabinet post conducting each hearing. Here is the schedule, courtesy of the website http://www.capitolhearings.org/ ...from which you can listen to the live audio for many of the hearings:
Tuesday 1/17
Secretary of the Interior: Ryan Zinke...Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, 10 am
Secretary of Education: Betsy DeVos...Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, 5 pm
Wednesday 1/18 (all hearings at 10 am)
Secretary of Commerce; Wilbur Ross, Jr...Committee on Commerce, Science, and Technology
EPA Administrator: Scott Pruitt...Committee on Environment and Public Works
United Nations Ambassador: Nikki Haley...Committee on Foreign Relations
Secretary of Health and Human Services: Tom Price...Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Thursday 1/19
Secretary of Energy: Rick Perry...Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, 10 am
Regarding last week's hearings, I listened to a lot of Jeff Sessions' hearing for Attorney General and a good amount of those for Rex Tillerson, James Mattis, and Mike Pompeo for Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, and CIA Director, respectively...and a little of Ben Carson's hearing for Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Except for Tillerson, who has shown a marked lack of loyalty to the United States pertaining to his business relationship with Russianpresident dictator Vladimir Putin and displayed an attitude of elitist condescension toward the Senators questioning him, I was impressed and encouraged with the nominees. Of course, if ultimately confirmed and installed in their respective posts, they'll still have to answer to Donald Trump, who up until now has showed no signs whatsoever that he is emotionally more mature than a spoiled, vindictive little six-year-old brat whenever he encounters any opposition or criticism. I want for Trump to be a good and successful president, but he isn't providing me any sense of confidence to support that hope, in spite of some of the people he has nominated to his Cabinet...
Tuesday 1/17
Secretary of the Interior: Ryan Zinke...Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, 10 am
Secretary of Education: Betsy DeVos...Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, 5 pm
Wednesday 1/18 (all hearings at 10 am)
Secretary of Commerce; Wilbur Ross, Jr...Committee on Commerce, Science, and Technology
EPA Administrator: Scott Pruitt...Committee on Environment and Public Works
United Nations Ambassador: Nikki Haley...Committee on Foreign Relations
Secretary of Health and Human Services: Tom Price...Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Thursday 1/19
Secretary of Energy: Rick Perry...Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, 10 am
Regarding last week's hearings, I listened to a lot of Jeff Sessions' hearing for Attorney General and a good amount of those for Rex Tillerson, James Mattis, and Mike Pompeo for Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, and CIA Director, respectively...and a little of Ben Carson's hearing for Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Except for Tillerson, who has shown a marked lack of loyalty to the United States pertaining to his business relationship with Russian
Sunday, January 15, 2017
NFL Playoffs Not Going Well for Me So Far
Ever since the Miami Dolphins lost miserably to the Steelers last week in the first playoff round...and in miserable 17-degree (1-degree chill factor) conditions at Pittsburgh...I have been scrambling to figure out exactly who to root for among the National Football League teams still in the playoff mix. My favorite team out of gratitude, the New York Giants...who ingratiated themselves to me by twice beating the hated New England Patriots in past Super Bowls, also got thumped under even more frigid conditions at Green Bay. So the Packers will play at Dallas later this afternoon, the winner facing Atlanta for the National Conference championship next week. The Falcons surprised visiting Seattle, my "other" favorite team in this conference, by decisively defeating them yesterday...so far "my" teams just aren't doing very well in the playoffs this year. And what's worse: the Patriots manhandled the Houston Texans in their game last night, making them the home team in the American Conference championship game against the winner of the Steelers/Chiefs game to be played this evening at Kansas City. Now that all of the teams that traditionally (or recently) have been favorites of mine have dropped out...or never made the playoffs to begin with...I'm left with the defeat of New England being my primary goal. Yet I know that, of the six teams left in the playoffs, Atlanta and Kansas City are my favorites in their respective conferences...and Dallas is my least favorite in the NFC. So today I'll be rooting for Green Bay to beat Dallas and Kansas City to advance over Pittsburgh, but as I said before I'm not doing too well so far with the playoffs this season...with the Seahawks' win over Detroit in the first round being the only bright spot...and am waiting for something to get excited about: I mean, none of the games have even been close!
As for the Dolphins, I'm still proud of them for breaking through some barriers (first winning team and playoff qualifier since 2008) and showing some clutch, spirited play in close games and in the second half of the season...a marked departure from the pattern they displayed in the recent past and no doubt due in part to their new head coach Adam Gase. Now it's time to build upon their success...let's see if they can win in the playoffs next year...
As for the Dolphins, I'm still proud of them for breaking through some barriers (first winning team and playoff qualifier since 2008) and showing some clutch, spirited play in close games and in the second half of the season...a marked departure from the pattern they displayed in the recent past and no doubt due in part to their new head coach Adam Gase. Now it's time to build upon their success...let's see if they can win in the playoffs next year...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
