Linda Olsson, born and raised in Sweden and now living in New Zealand, just happened to write her first novel Astrid and Veronika (originally titled Let Me Sing You Gentle Songs) about two Swedish women, one of whom lived for a while in New Zealand. But these women, 81-year old Astrid and 32-year old Veronika, have widely divergent histories, experiences...and personalities...as they meet and become close friends and confidants...
Astrid is a recluse in her rural Swedish village whose husband, whom she detests and had wed in an arranged marriage brokered by her father decades earlier, is dying in a nearby nursing home. Rarely going out, she notices a new neighbor in the house facing her, a young woman. Veronika, an aspiring writer, has just moved back to Sweden from New Zealand. The two women inevitably cross paths and meet, and discover each other's tragic life stories as they enjoy their walks and meals together. Although very different in temperament, they reveal that each one lost her mother in childhood, Astrid's through death and Veronika's from abandonment. Astrid did have an early love in her life, but he tragically died. Veronika was in love, too...well, maybe you should read this book to get all the details, I don't want to reveal everything...
I didn't particularly enjoy Astrid and Veronika, but then again I don't believe that's always necessary in order to get something of value from a book. It gave me a model of what a good, mutual friendship based on empathy and prioritizing the other's preferences and feelings can look like...and the people involved can be different. Courtesy does not always mean formality...it can help people come together who otherwise would be inclined to keep to themselves. There was honesty in both women when they discussed their pasts, and they respectfully, patiently, and sympathetically listened to each other...even during some very difficult sections. The story was set in our present time, but there were many flashbacks as Astrid and Veronika told their stories...
I think the author did a good job of delineating each woman's personality and making it consistent with their past and present behavior...not always an easy thing to do. Astrid and Veronika is not escapist literature and as such may not attract the kind of reading audience that flocks to more popular works. I'm glad I read it...you may find yourself loving it or hating it, it's that type of book...
Saturday, October 28, 2017
Friday, October 27, 2017
Quote of the Week...from Ted Cruz
I'm not serving in office because I desperately needed 99 new friends in the U.S. Senate.
---Ted Cruz
Last week I quoted progressive Democratic senator Al Franken, who has recently come out with a new book, Giant of the Senate. In it he largely disparaged the approach that junior Texas senator Ted Cruz had taken to relations with him and his fellow senators. Almost immediately after taking office in January 2013, Cruz would often bluntly confront his Senate colleagues with very little consideration for courtesy and tact...two of the more offended senators were Diane Feinstein (D, CA) and Mitch McConnell (R, KY), the latter being Cruz's own caucus "boss". This public grandstanding rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, including me. And then he ran for president for the 2016 election...and my opinion of Ted Cruz dramatically changed...
Yes, Ted Cruz is very theatrical with his oratory, and if you disagree with a lot of what he is saying...as I do...he can come across as smug and patronizing. Yet I am not one of his colleagues: I'm just one of 300 million+ Americans, and if I look at him from that viewpoint Cruz imparts respect to me. I was particularly impressed with the gracious manner with which he dealt with the unprecedented viciousness of rival candidate Donald Trump's attacks against him during the campaign. I am also thoroughly perplexed as to why much of the important core base of political support from conservative evangelical Christians jumped over to support someone with an unapologetically degenerate character instead of Cruz, who would have been their ideal president (or Marco Rubio, for that matter). As the campaign wore on and it looked as if Trump would get the nomination, Ted Cruz did not resort to personal attacks against his primary opponent but rather continued to run on the issues and directed his criticism primarily at the Democratic opposition...talk about grace in the face of adversity. And then his speech at the Republican National Convention was nothing short of brilliant...
Whenever I watch the floor proceedings of the U.S. Senate and Ted Cruz pops into view, either serving as the presiding officer, giving a speech, or casting a vote, I continue to scrutinize him to see if my newfound respect for him is correct...or if he really is that obnoxious dude I saw just a few years ago. I suspect he's a little of both: one-on-one, he is not very likeable...but he's one of the smartest people in the Senate and an excellent orator. The other day he spoke in the Senate about seven planks of what he deems to be a formula for success with tax reform if they are implemented: my leanings toward the Democrats notwithstanding, a lot of what Senator Cruz said made sense to me. Without any hint of a doubt, I would feel much, much more secure and confident about our future here in America...in spite of my political differences with Ted Cruz...were he now our sitting president instead of what we've been handed...
---Ted Cruz
Last week I quoted progressive Democratic senator Al Franken, who has recently come out with a new book, Giant of the Senate. In it he largely disparaged the approach that junior Texas senator Ted Cruz had taken to relations with him and his fellow senators. Almost immediately after taking office in January 2013, Cruz would often bluntly confront his Senate colleagues with very little consideration for courtesy and tact...two of the more offended senators were Diane Feinstein (D, CA) and Mitch McConnell (R, KY), the latter being Cruz's own caucus "boss". This public grandstanding rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, including me. And then he ran for president for the 2016 election...and my opinion of Ted Cruz dramatically changed...
Yes, Ted Cruz is very theatrical with his oratory, and if you disagree with a lot of what he is saying...as I do...he can come across as smug and patronizing. Yet I am not one of his colleagues: I'm just one of 300 million+ Americans, and if I look at him from that viewpoint Cruz imparts respect to me. I was particularly impressed with the gracious manner with which he dealt with the unprecedented viciousness of rival candidate Donald Trump's attacks against him during the campaign. I am also thoroughly perplexed as to why much of the important core base of political support from conservative evangelical Christians jumped over to support someone with an unapologetically degenerate character instead of Cruz, who would have been their ideal president (or Marco Rubio, for that matter). As the campaign wore on and it looked as if Trump would get the nomination, Ted Cruz did not resort to personal attacks against his primary opponent but rather continued to run on the issues and directed his criticism primarily at the Democratic opposition...talk about grace in the face of adversity. And then his speech at the Republican National Convention was nothing short of brilliant...
Whenever I watch the floor proceedings of the U.S. Senate and Ted Cruz pops into view, either serving as the presiding officer, giving a speech, or casting a vote, I continue to scrutinize him to see if my newfound respect for him is correct...or if he really is that obnoxious dude I saw just a few years ago. I suspect he's a little of both: one-on-one, he is not very likeable...but he's one of the smartest people in the Senate and an excellent orator. The other day he spoke in the Senate about seven planks of what he deems to be a formula for success with tax reform if they are implemented: my leanings toward the Democrats notwithstanding, a lot of what Senator Cruz said made sense to me. Without any hint of a doubt, I would feel much, much more secure and confident about our future here in America...in spite of my political differences with Ted Cruz...were he now our sitting president instead of what we've been handed...
Thursday, October 26, 2017
10/22 Sermon on David, Part 6
Last Sunday at The Family Church here in Gainesville, senior pastor Philip Griffin continued his series about David, King of Israel. The focus for discussion was repentance, both as it applied to David and to us as we overcome our own transgressions. The primary scripture reference was Psalm 51: 1-13...you can read it by clicking on the following link to Bible Gateway: [link]...
In his message Pastor Philip identified five areas of importance as they pertain to the process of repentance, which is the turning away from sin in favor of righteousness: God wants us to move past our mistakes, admit our guilt, use our brokenness to grow ourselves, leave our old ways behind, and turn our repentance into ministry to others. Identifying and admitting guilt is obviously necessary in order to purposefully change behavior, brokenness leads to dependency on God's empowering through the Holy Spirit to enable that change, dispensing with the old ways...as Philip pointed out...through actual behavior and not just rationalizing. And when this is accomplished, true repentance can serve as a positive, encouraging example for others to follow...
The scripture refers to the sin David committed against God by taking Bathsheba from her husband and then sending him to his death. His confession, brokenness, and repentance of this sin, from what we know, was final and without any backtracking. In our own lives, though, repentance can be more of a process of listening to God's direction, progressing, then slipping, being convicted, and turning again in the right direction. Bad ways can be bad habits, but God can change anything for his own purposes in those of his people who trust in him...
You can view Pastor Philip's message via the church's YouTube video site...here's a link to it: [link]. The Family Church is at 2022 SW 122nd Street, on the western outskirts of Gainesville, and holds its Sunday morning services at 9:30 and 11. Coffee, sermon, praise music, coffee, friendly folks, prayer, coffee...sounds like a good thing to me...
In his message Pastor Philip identified five areas of importance as they pertain to the process of repentance, which is the turning away from sin in favor of righteousness: God wants us to move past our mistakes, admit our guilt, use our brokenness to grow ourselves, leave our old ways behind, and turn our repentance into ministry to others. Identifying and admitting guilt is obviously necessary in order to purposefully change behavior, brokenness leads to dependency on God's empowering through the Holy Spirit to enable that change, dispensing with the old ways...as Philip pointed out...through actual behavior and not just rationalizing. And when this is accomplished, true repentance can serve as a positive, encouraging example for others to follow...
The scripture refers to the sin David committed against God by taking Bathsheba from her husband and then sending him to his death. His confession, brokenness, and repentance of this sin, from what we know, was final and without any backtracking. In our own lives, though, repentance can be more of a process of listening to God's direction, progressing, then slipping, being convicted, and turning again in the right direction. Bad ways can be bad habits, but God can change anything for his own purposes in those of his people who trust in him...
You can view Pastor Philip's message via the church's YouTube video site...here's a link to it: [link]. The Family Church is at 2022 SW 122nd Street, on the western outskirts of Gainesville, and holds its Sunday morning services at 9:30 and 11. Coffee, sermon, praise music, coffee, friendly folks, prayer, coffee...sounds like a good thing to me...
Wednesday, October 25, 2017
Wednesday's Short Story: Time is the Traitor by Alfred Bester
I first read Time is the Traitor, by Alfred Bester, back in the late 1980s along with many other short stories, but this one has stuck with me over the years for a couple of important reasons. It appears in the anthology Isaac Asimov Presents the Great SF Stories 15 (1953), published by DAW Books in 1986. It is set in a distant future when humankind has settled more than 700 worlds and huge corporations dominate the interstellar economy. John Strapp has the gift of intuition that enables him to make Decisions with an 87% probability of being correct...for the companies this is a very valuable commodity and he makes a fortune selling them to his clients who span the stars. But Strapp has a couple of quirks to his personality: he goes into a murderous rage against anyone named Kruger and he aggressively, predatorily pursues women who line up with certain very specific physical specifications of his...what's going on here? His staff is concerned that these issues may bring down his (and consequently their) enterprise, so they get amiable ex-heavyweight fighter Frank Alceste to befriend him and get to the bottom of the problems. Alceste does and...well, here is that expected moment when I say you'll just have to read the rest for yourself...
Those two reasons that made Time is the Traitor memorable to me are the following: we live in an age when scientific research, by its nature highly technical and difficult to understand even by other scientists outside a particular specialty, nevertheless carries great importance from its conclusions about different issues. The world's climate is warming at an alarming rate due to man-made carbon emissions, we are told...and we must act now to counteract it. This is based on studies done by specialized scientists...to accept their conclusions requires a kind of faith in science without knowing the exact reasons. John Strapp's method of using his intuition had nothing scientific to back him up...just his own gut feelings and a record of 87% accuracy. So which of these best predicts the future and which would you follow...precise, empirical data leading to a conclusion by trained specialists or an individual with a consistent record of good hunches? I don't have the answer to this question. The second thing about this story that stuck with me was near the ending, which I'm not giving away. I'll just share this much: it's interesting how people's memories can play tricks on them to the point where something long missed and desired can come back and yet they themselves have changed so much that they are incapable of recognizing it as what they had been pursuing all along. Well, I guess you're now going to have to read Time is the Traitor to know what the heck I'm talking about...
Those two reasons that made Time is the Traitor memorable to me are the following: we live in an age when scientific research, by its nature highly technical and difficult to understand even by other scientists outside a particular specialty, nevertheless carries great importance from its conclusions about different issues. The world's climate is warming at an alarming rate due to man-made carbon emissions, we are told...and we must act now to counteract it. This is based on studies done by specialized scientists...to accept their conclusions requires a kind of faith in science without knowing the exact reasons. John Strapp's method of using his intuition had nothing scientific to back him up...just his own gut feelings and a record of 87% accuracy. So which of these best predicts the future and which would you follow...precise, empirical data leading to a conclusion by trained specialists or an individual with a consistent record of good hunches? I don't have the answer to this question. The second thing about this story that stuck with me was near the ending, which I'm not giving away. I'll just share this much: it's interesting how people's memories can play tricks on them to the point where something long missed and desired can come back and yet they themselves have changed so much that they are incapable of recognizing it as what they had been pursuing all along. Well, I guess you're now going to have to read Time is the Traitor to know what the heck I'm talking about...
Tuesday, October 24, 2017
Tuesday's List: I Rank the Harry Potter Books
With all the times they keep showing Harry Potter movies on TV these days, it might be easy to forget that in years past, Harry Potter was first and foremost a great adventure in reading, widely lauded for encouraging children with this activity. One day in 2000 I went to my local Books-a-Million for my usual daily flavored coffee, planning to browse around the store. Instead the place was packed with kids and employees dressed and made up like characters in J.K. Rowling's popular series about the young English wizard. Why all this hullaballoo? Book Number Four, titled Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, had just been released and the store was holding a big celebration as fans came in to pick up their preordered books. I did manage to find a seat in the café and, looking around me, decided I'd better get on the Harry Potter reading train. So that year I caught up on the first four books...and waited for the next one to come out. Meanwhile, the first Harry Potter movie hit the theaters and I wondered...as I am wondering now about George R.R. Martin's delay in publishing the next volume in his A Song of Fire and Ice "Game of Thrones" series after it was adapted to an HBO series...if the movies weren't holding up the release of Rowling's next book. Finally, it came out and I kept up with the written series, even going to the final two book parties at Books-a-Million. And I watched all the movies as well...
I strongly recommend the books over the movies, although the latter did a generally good job at holding to the story lines and portrayed the characters well. The books had a great amount of background story material that the movies omitted...you miss a lot if you skip them, so I'm glad I first read the books before starting in on the movies. There were seven in all, and I have my own preferences that I will list below...with a little commentary, of course. Each book's title begins with the words "Harry Potter and", which I left out of the list. Oh, by the way, I liked ALL of the books, even my least favorite one...
1 THE PRISONER OF AZKABAN (Book 3)
One of the best time-travel stories I've read, and the Marauder's Map was a brilliant gift for young Potter, a compulsive snoop. And the mystery of the four animagus Hogwarts students Moony, Wormtail, Padfoot, and Prongs...
2 THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE (Book 6)
Severus Snape's role as the series' wild-card character, the flashbacks to Voldemort as Hogwarts student Tom Riddle, the mysterious potions book, and the introduction of Professor Slughorn, collector of students...
3 THE GOBLET OF FIRE (Book 4)
Probably the most convoluted of all the Potter tales, the book reveals much, much more than the movie. Harry, Ron, and Hermione are shown entering adolescence, with their change in personalities and interests. The Quidditch World Cup and the Triwizard Tournament, features only of this book, dominate the story...
4 THE CHAMBER OF SECRETS (Book 2)
Students, a cat...and even a ghost...are found in catatonic states at Hogwarts, and the trail seems to lead back to Harry, who always seems to be at the scene of the crime and has the very suspicious ability to converse with snakes. The very seedy and sinister Knockturn Alley, right next to the more reputable Diagon Alley, captured my imagination...
5 THE SORCERER'S STONE (Book 1)
Originally called Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, it introduces Harry Potter and the secret world of magic, full of wizards and magical creatures and places, that exists parallel to our own and has its own school for young wizards: Hogwarts. I didn't quite get the ending, though...
6 THE DEATHLY HALLOWS (Book 7)
All final books in a long series can be a little bit long on explanation and resolution and short on new, innovative material...Rowling made this book a delightful exception to that rule with the three Deathly Hallows. The resolution of the conflict at the end differs in detail with the movie version, though...
7 THE ORDER OF THE PHOENIX (Book 5)
There is a plausible explanation given later as to why Harry Potter is always angrily yelling at everyone in this book...but it began to get under my skin after a while. Also, the whole premise of Voldemort's plot made absolutely no sense whatsoever to me...what difference does knowing the special prophecy's message make in the struggle between the Dark Lord and the good guys?
I strongly recommend the books over the movies, although the latter did a generally good job at holding to the story lines and portrayed the characters well. The books had a great amount of background story material that the movies omitted...you miss a lot if you skip them, so I'm glad I first read the books before starting in on the movies. There were seven in all, and I have my own preferences that I will list below...with a little commentary, of course. Each book's title begins with the words "Harry Potter and", which I left out of the list. Oh, by the way, I liked ALL of the books, even my least favorite one...
1 THE PRISONER OF AZKABAN (Book 3)
One of the best time-travel stories I've read, and the Marauder's Map was a brilliant gift for young Potter, a compulsive snoop. And the mystery of the four animagus Hogwarts students Moony, Wormtail, Padfoot, and Prongs...
2 THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE (Book 6)
Severus Snape's role as the series' wild-card character, the flashbacks to Voldemort as Hogwarts student Tom Riddle, the mysterious potions book, and the introduction of Professor Slughorn, collector of students...
3 THE GOBLET OF FIRE (Book 4)
Probably the most convoluted of all the Potter tales, the book reveals much, much more than the movie. Harry, Ron, and Hermione are shown entering adolescence, with their change in personalities and interests. The Quidditch World Cup and the Triwizard Tournament, features only of this book, dominate the story...
4 THE CHAMBER OF SECRETS (Book 2)
Students, a cat...and even a ghost...are found in catatonic states at Hogwarts, and the trail seems to lead back to Harry, who always seems to be at the scene of the crime and has the very suspicious ability to converse with snakes. The very seedy and sinister Knockturn Alley, right next to the more reputable Diagon Alley, captured my imagination...
5 THE SORCERER'S STONE (Book 1)
Originally called Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, it introduces Harry Potter and the secret world of magic, full of wizards and magical creatures and places, that exists parallel to our own and has its own school for young wizards: Hogwarts. I didn't quite get the ending, though...
6 THE DEATHLY HALLOWS (Book 7)
All final books in a long series can be a little bit long on explanation and resolution and short on new, innovative material...Rowling made this book a delightful exception to that rule with the three Deathly Hallows. The resolution of the conflict at the end differs in detail with the movie version, though...
7 THE ORDER OF THE PHOENIX (Book 5)
There is a plausible explanation given later as to why Harry Potter is always angrily yelling at everyone in this book...but it began to get under my skin after a while. Also, the whole premise of Voldemort's plot made absolutely no sense whatsoever to me...what difference does knowing the special prophecy's message make in the struggle between the Dark Lord and the good guys?
Monday, October 23, 2017
Loyal to Own State's College Football Teams
The other day I wrote about how I was rooting for Florida State and Miami to win their football games while my hometown school, the University of Florida, had a much-needed bye week in anticipation of playing against long-time rival Georgia next Saturday. When I grew up in Hollywood...just a few miles north of Miami...the idea of supporting all Floridian teams whenever they weren't playing each other was very common. But since I moved to Gainesville, I noticed that the prevailing sentiment seems to hate the other two major college teams for all it's worth. I was disappointed in FSU's last-minute loss to Louisville, even though I'll be fervently pulling for the Gators when they face off later this year. And I was equally elated when the "Cardiac 'Canes" pulled out another win, this one against Syracuse. But my allegiance to my home state in no way transfers to that for the other teams in the Southeastern and Atlantic Coast Conferences...
Outside of Florida, there are few teams that I consistently support...and a couple that I vehemently oppose, both in Florida's own SEC: Alabama and Georgia. The Crimson Tide I dislike only because I dislike their coach, who deserted my Miami Dolphins in mid-contract after the 2006 season to coach his "dream team". With the Bulldogs, I don't dislike them per se...they just seem to be Florida's natural rival with a long history of bitter losses and glorious victories in their regular season games at Jacksonville...
There are other teams besides the "big three" in Florida: South Florida, Central Florida, Florida A&M, Bethune Cookman, Florida Atlantic, and Florida International. Of these, USF and UCF are enjoying particularly good seasons in 2017: I'll have to keep an eye on them...
Outside of Florida, there are few teams that I consistently support...and a couple that I vehemently oppose, both in Florida's own SEC: Alabama and Georgia. The Crimson Tide I dislike only because I dislike their coach, who deserted my Miami Dolphins in mid-contract after the 2006 season to coach his "dream team". With the Bulldogs, I don't dislike them per se...they just seem to be Florida's natural rival with a long history of bitter losses and glorious victories in their regular season games at Jacksonville...
There are other teams besides the "big three" in Florida: South Florida, Central Florida, Florida A&M, Bethune Cookman, Florida Atlantic, and Florida International. Of these, USF and UCF are enjoying particularly good seasons in 2017: I'll have to keep an eye on them...
Sunday, October 22, 2017
Just Finished Rereading Stephen King's Book On Writing
In the months immediately before and after a distracted van driver struck Stephen King while he was walking on the shoulder of a rural Maine road and nearly killed him in June, 1999, the famed author took a detour of his own from writing fiction and instead composed On Writing, which is part autobiography and part helpful hints for the aspiring writer. It's a small book by his standards, but packed with interesting and sometimes very helpful information. Stephen King believes that his advice, properly implemented, cannot make a great writer out of a good one, nor can it make a competent writer out of a poor one...but it can make a good writer out of a competent one. Well, I see myself as being in the general category of "competent", so I thought that checking out the recommendations of one of the most successful writers of our age couldn't hurt...
First of all, Stephen King's own personal story paints the picture of someone who was into writing and storytelling from a very early age, and his mother strongly encouraged him. Having support from those close to you has got to be a big plus, but sometimes this is beyond one's control. Still, King distilled some lessons he learned from his early writings and the many rejections he received from publishers. One is that the story reigns supreme...you want to develop your characters, descriptive language, and dialogue, but don't let them get in the way of the story. Two is that it is a very good idea to establish a regular time and place to write...a setting removed from distractions from others, television...even open windows to the outside can present a problem. The rationale is that, if you train yourself this way, then the creative thoughts will more easily come to you. Three is that story is not the same as plot, which there is no need to even consider when writing a story. Thinking in terms of advancing the plot creates awkward writing and implies that the ending has already been mapped out in advance, something that King is usually opposed to doing...this is the one piece of his advice that I am uncertain about. Four, in the first draft of a story, write, write, write freely to your heart's content...then when you're finished, put it aside for a few weeks. Then return to it and read what you've written, making technical corrections...and then have a trusted "ideal" reader go over it and give you needed feedback. And five, there's something in editorial circles called the "10 %" rule, meaning that generally the amount of words in a story can and should be reduced by that amount in order to curtail redundancy and make the text more readable. There are a few other gems of advice that King dispenses...this is a pretty handy book...
Above everything Stephen King stresses that if anyone wants to be a serious writer, there are two things they have to spend a lot of time doing: reading and writing. For most of us, the writing part seems obvious, but a lot of reading can help to indicate what works in a good story and what doesn't...and also what's already been done before. Not that you should read for those reasons alone...no, read for the enjoyment! After all, that's how you'll want anyone reading your own stories to approach them...
First of all, Stephen King's own personal story paints the picture of someone who was into writing and storytelling from a very early age, and his mother strongly encouraged him. Having support from those close to you has got to be a big plus, but sometimes this is beyond one's control. Still, King distilled some lessons he learned from his early writings and the many rejections he received from publishers. One is that the story reigns supreme...you want to develop your characters, descriptive language, and dialogue, but don't let them get in the way of the story. Two is that it is a very good idea to establish a regular time and place to write...a setting removed from distractions from others, television...even open windows to the outside can present a problem. The rationale is that, if you train yourself this way, then the creative thoughts will more easily come to you. Three is that story is not the same as plot, which there is no need to even consider when writing a story. Thinking in terms of advancing the plot creates awkward writing and implies that the ending has already been mapped out in advance, something that King is usually opposed to doing...this is the one piece of his advice that I am uncertain about. Four, in the first draft of a story, write, write, write freely to your heart's content...then when you're finished, put it aside for a few weeks. Then return to it and read what you've written, making technical corrections...and then have a trusted "ideal" reader go over it and give you needed feedback. And five, there's something in editorial circles called the "10 %" rule, meaning that generally the amount of words in a story can and should be reduced by that amount in order to curtail redundancy and make the text more readable. There are a few other gems of advice that King dispenses...this is a pretty handy book...
Above everything Stephen King stresses that if anyone wants to be a serious writer, there are two things they have to spend a lot of time doing: reading and writing. For most of us, the writing part seems obvious, but a lot of reading can help to indicate what works in a good story and what doesn't...and also what's already been done before. Not that you should read for those reasons alone...no, read for the enjoyment! After all, that's how you'll want anyone reading your own stories to approach them...
Saturday, October 21, 2017
Saturday Afternoon with Starbucks and Football
I'm sitting outside for a few minutes on this late Saturday afternoon at the brand-new Starbucks off NW 43rd Street in far northern Gainesville, the closest one to my house. As a matter of fact, I am looking out across the street at one of the running routes I would regularly take a few years ago when I was training for the marathon and put in several 15-plus-mile runs. I'm not in shape now for any runs that long, but would like to get back up to that level. I do know that if I were in good enough condition for it, this weather would be perfect: overcast skies, a nice little breeze, and moderate temperatures. Finally it looks as if we are going to start getting autumn weather conditions: temperatures will be dipping into the 40s next week and peaking in the 60s...now that's the way u-huh u-huh I like it...
Speaking of late Saturday autumn afternoons, it's the middle of football season and my Florida Gators have a bye week before they head off to Jacksonville to try and upset Georgia. I wish them well without my hopes getting too high. UF isn't the only Florida school with football issues this season: Florida State, initially ranked number three in the country, fell today to 2-4 after losing a heartbreaker to Louisville 31-28, after it looked as if the Seminoles were in position to close out the game with an easy field goal...but their talented freshman quarterback James Blackman fumbled the ball away and the Cardinals went downfield to win it. The University of Miami is still holding on to a 13-6 lead over Syracuse...I root for all my in-state teams as long as they aren't playing against Florida. With the Hurricanes, though, it feels a little awkward after all the years of pulling against current UM coach Mark Richt when he was in charge of Georgia. In the pros, the Miami Dolphins seem to have finally woken up and are playing some pretty good football of late...especially on the defensive side. Their next game will be a rematch with the New York Jets, which they lost to miserably the first time around 20-6...
Well, I think I'll get up, go down to Publix and pick up some groceries, and then head on home...
Speaking of late Saturday autumn afternoons, it's the middle of football season and my Florida Gators have a bye week before they head off to Jacksonville to try and upset Georgia. I wish them well without my hopes getting too high. UF isn't the only Florida school with football issues this season: Florida State, initially ranked number three in the country, fell today to 2-4 after losing a heartbreaker to Louisville 31-28, after it looked as if the Seminoles were in position to close out the game with an easy field goal...but their talented freshman quarterback James Blackman fumbled the ball away and the Cardinals went downfield to win it. The University of Miami is still holding on to a 13-6 lead over Syracuse...I root for all my in-state teams as long as they aren't playing against Florida. With the Hurricanes, though, it feels a little awkward after all the years of pulling against current UM coach Mark Richt when he was in charge of Georgia. In the pros, the Miami Dolphins seem to have finally woken up and are playing some pretty good football of late...especially on the defensive side. Their next game will be a rematch with the New York Jets, which they lost to miserably the first time around 20-6...
Well, I think I'll get up, go down to Publix and pick up some groceries, and then head on home...
Friday, October 20, 2017
Quote of the Week...from Al Franken
The biases the media has are much bigger than conservative or liberal. They're about getting ratings, about making money, about doing stories that are easy to cover. --Al Franken
Not that there isn't plenty of partisan and ideological bias in the media today, but Senator Franken is correct: the reporting and discussions we experience...especially on television...have been greatly simplified, personalized, and delivered for their emotional impact and ability to attract viewers (who then watch the commercials), not as a means to inform and educate. The fact that our president can tie up so much news time with his absurd Twitter posts is symptomatic of this dereliction of mass journalism in the early twenty-first century. I can easily spot...and most probably you can, too...whenever someone is leaning too far over to one political side over the other. But it is much more insidious when it comes to choosing WHAT to cover...FoxNews can discuss an issue and claim that they are balanced because they have a conservative and a liberal debating it, but if the topic is always about Hillary's emails then the bias is already embedded. The bottom line is that when media can choose between devoting coverage to issues facing us and the personalities involved in the debate, they usually lean toward the personalities...
I never did think Al Franken was funny on Saturday Night Live, but I hadn't realized that he was more of a behind-the-scenes figure in this series, writing much of the comedic material. Since then, he's gone into politics, first as an opinion-maker with some bestselling books and then as one of Minnesota's senators since 2009. He is a staunch progressive Democrat who I feel looks out strongly for the interests of people at large and in particular for those he represents in Minnesota...including groups not a part of his political base and not just the wealthy, vested interests that control so much of what happens on Capitol Hill. Sometimes I think Franken is a bit too blunt and undiplomatic in his approach, but compared to the current occupant of the White House he's pretty tame and easy-going. I just finished reading his current release, titled Giant of the Senate, and which relates his upbringing, the years with SNL and his relationships with his colleagues there...and then the turn to politics, finally discussing his first term in the United States Senate. I found the book very educational and entertaining, although I'd already read a lot of the earlier stuff about him. It was his Senate chapters that interested me the most, especially the parts where he discussed different issues in greater detail than the media is willing to cover...
I just heard that Al Franken and Attorney General Jeff Sessions were in a heated exchange the other day in a Senate hearing...sounds like business as usual. But although he is partisan in his politics, the Minnesota senator and former comic is developing a reputation in his current post as someone who is very personable and willing to work across the aisle with Republicans on issues of mutual benefit. And Bill O'Reilly despises him...yet another feather in his cap...
Not that there isn't plenty of partisan and ideological bias in the media today, but Senator Franken is correct: the reporting and discussions we experience...especially on television...have been greatly simplified, personalized, and delivered for their emotional impact and ability to attract viewers (who then watch the commercials), not as a means to inform and educate. The fact that our president can tie up so much news time with his absurd Twitter posts is symptomatic of this dereliction of mass journalism in the early twenty-first century. I can easily spot...and most probably you can, too...whenever someone is leaning too far over to one political side over the other. But it is much more insidious when it comes to choosing WHAT to cover...FoxNews can discuss an issue and claim that they are balanced because they have a conservative and a liberal debating it, but if the topic is always about Hillary's emails then the bias is already embedded. The bottom line is that when media can choose between devoting coverage to issues facing us and the personalities involved in the debate, they usually lean toward the personalities...
I never did think Al Franken was funny on Saturday Night Live, but I hadn't realized that he was more of a behind-the-scenes figure in this series, writing much of the comedic material. Since then, he's gone into politics, first as an opinion-maker with some bestselling books and then as one of Minnesota's senators since 2009. He is a staunch progressive Democrat who I feel looks out strongly for the interests of people at large and in particular for those he represents in Minnesota...including groups not a part of his political base and not just the wealthy, vested interests that control so much of what happens on Capitol Hill. Sometimes I think Franken is a bit too blunt and undiplomatic in his approach, but compared to the current occupant of the White House he's pretty tame and easy-going. I just finished reading his current release, titled Giant of the Senate, and which relates his upbringing, the years with SNL and his relationships with his colleagues there...and then the turn to politics, finally discussing his first term in the United States Senate. I found the book very educational and entertaining, although I'd already read a lot of the earlier stuff about him. It was his Senate chapters that interested me the most, especially the parts where he discussed different issues in greater detail than the media is willing to cover...
I just heard that Al Franken and Attorney General Jeff Sessions were in a heated exchange the other day in a Senate hearing...sounds like business as usual. But although he is partisan in his politics, the Minnesota senator and former comic is developing a reputation in his current post as someone who is very personable and willing to work across the aisle with Republicans on issues of mutual benefit. And Bill O'Reilly despises him...yet another feather in his cap...
Thursday, October 19, 2017
10/15 Sermon on David, Pt. 5
The sermon series here at The Family Church in Gainesville, Florida about David, king of Israel, his relationship with God...and how we in our present time can learn from it...continued with a message focusing on the story of David and Bathsheba. The text of focus was the narrative presented in 2 Samuel 11:1-5...you can read it through the following link to Bible Gateway: [link]. Philip Griffin, our senior pastor, used this story and other scattered Bible passages to delineate the difference between two roads we can take: the one to compromise or the one to integrity...
David chose the road to compromising his principles when he made several decisions that ultimately led him to seduce Bathsheba and betray her husband Uriah, who was one of his most loyal and courageous soldiers. As Pastor Philip put in the form of a word equation: Wrong Place + Wrong Time + Wrong Focus = Wrong Action...David made all these mistakes and had to live with their consequences. After repenting, he chose the road to integrity. How can we go down that road? Philip listed four components: make my first commitment to God, maintain proper boundaries, monitor my own heart, and manage my mind. In other words, with God being the top priority, I need to be in a constant state of spiritual self-examination as to whether I am walking according to his plan for my life...or whether I am slipping into that Wrong Place, Time, and Focus trap that leads to compromise and Wrong Action...
You can see this message for yourself, which I recommend since what you're reading in this article is just a summary and Pastor Philip is an excellent communicator. Just click on the following YouTube video link to watch it: [link]. The Family Church is at 2022 SW 122nd Street and holds its Sunday services, replete with the weekly message, worship music, prayer, and fellowship, at 9:30 and 11. I imagine that next week we'll be hearing more about King David...
David chose the road to compromising his principles when he made several decisions that ultimately led him to seduce Bathsheba and betray her husband Uriah, who was one of his most loyal and courageous soldiers. As Pastor Philip put in the form of a word equation: Wrong Place + Wrong Time + Wrong Focus = Wrong Action...David made all these mistakes and had to live with their consequences. After repenting, he chose the road to integrity. How can we go down that road? Philip listed four components: make my first commitment to God, maintain proper boundaries, monitor my own heart, and manage my mind. In other words, with God being the top priority, I need to be in a constant state of spiritual self-examination as to whether I am walking according to his plan for my life...or whether I am slipping into that Wrong Place, Time, and Focus trap that leads to compromise and Wrong Action...
You can see this message for yourself, which I recommend since what you're reading in this article is just a summary and Pastor Philip is an excellent communicator. Just click on the following YouTube video link to watch it: [link]. The Family Church is at 2022 SW 122nd Street and holds its Sunday services, replete with the weekly message, worship music, prayer, and fellowship, at 9:30 and 11. I imagine that next week we'll be hearing more about King David...
Wednesday, October 18, 2017
Wednesday's Short Story: Crouch End by Stephen King
Although Stephen King is primarily known for his novels, he is also an excellent short story writer, coming out every few years with a new collection. One of these, 1993's Nightmares and Dreamscapes, contains several good pieces, but by far my favorite (as well as one of my all-time favorite Stephen King stories) is Crouch End. Named for a London suburb, the setting of the story, it concerns itself with alternate worlds and the "thin places" on Earth through which passage is sometimes possible...
The story is told through a flashback at the local police station as young American tourist Doris Freeman is relating her harrowing ordeal to the officers on duty there. Doris, her husband Lonnie, and their two children are on vacation, first to England and later Barcelona. While in London Lonnie decides to visit a business contact living in Crouch End, and Doris is going with him in a cab, the kids having remained at the hotel with a sitter. It is getting late in the day as they arrive, and Lonnie has foolishly lost his friend's address. The cab parks near a phone booth and he goes there to make a call, and Doris soon follows after him. Lonnie gets his address, but as they both look back at the cab, it is gone...and then they notice that the scenery around them has changed as well. During the next few hours...well, this is where I get off the storytelling bus and you'll just have to get on yourself to see what happens...
Crouch End reminds me of times in my otherwise ordinary, mundane life in which I discern that things around me aren't quite "right"...that something undecipherable has changed and it's not necessarily for the better. Wanting to believe that I am a sensible person, I attribute these feelings to my own imagination and propensity for the dramatic...after all, I do like to read Stephen King's books. So no, I'm not talking about entering a parallel universe or crossing over into another dimension...although there are some areas around Gainesville that are frankly hair-raising in their creepiness, one of them being near my workplace and marked by a prevalence of strange people and an overriding sense of wrongness. I have also heard of haunted house stories from people whom I otherwise would regard as completely rational and grounded in reality. When I used to work the graveyard shift at my job, I would listen to a late-night radio talk show that catered to these kinds of thoughts...we humans do tend toward the melodramatic, don't we...
Crouch End is a tribute to the horror fiction of H.P. Lovecraft, and King references much of his material in this short tale. The two police officers, the seasoned Vetter and the novice Farnham, play an important role in how the story ends. Whether or not there is any true basis for the kind of scenario presented here is one thing: what I'm sure of is that there are many, many such places scattered all over the world that the locals regard in much the same, wary manner as those in Crouch End, even if everything is ultimately explainable in terms of our own reality...
Well, that's my "spooky" Halloween article, even if it is a couple of weeks early...
The story is told through a flashback at the local police station as young American tourist Doris Freeman is relating her harrowing ordeal to the officers on duty there. Doris, her husband Lonnie, and their two children are on vacation, first to England and later Barcelona. While in London Lonnie decides to visit a business contact living in Crouch End, and Doris is going with him in a cab, the kids having remained at the hotel with a sitter. It is getting late in the day as they arrive, and Lonnie has foolishly lost his friend's address. The cab parks near a phone booth and he goes there to make a call, and Doris soon follows after him. Lonnie gets his address, but as they both look back at the cab, it is gone...and then they notice that the scenery around them has changed as well. During the next few hours...well, this is where I get off the storytelling bus and you'll just have to get on yourself to see what happens...
Crouch End reminds me of times in my otherwise ordinary, mundane life in which I discern that things around me aren't quite "right"...that something undecipherable has changed and it's not necessarily for the better. Wanting to believe that I am a sensible person, I attribute these feelings to my own imagination and propensity for the dramatic...after all, I do like to read Stephen King's books. So no, I'm not talking about entering a parallel universe or crossing over into another dimension...although there are some areas around Gainesville that are frankly hair-raising in their creepiness, one of them being near my workplace and marked by a prevalence of strange people and an overriding sense of wrongness. I have also heard of haunted house stories from people whom I otherwise would regard as completely rational and grounded in reality. When I used to work the graveyard shift at my job, I would listen to a late-night radio talk show that catered to these kinds of thoughts...we humans do tend toward the melodramatic, don't we...
Crouch End is a tribute to the horror fiction of H.P. Lovecraft, and King references much of his material in this short tale. The two police officers, the seasoned Vetter and the novice Farnham, play an important role in how the story ends. Whether or not there is any true basis for the kind of scenario presented here is one thing: what I'm sure of is that there are many, many such places scattered all over the world that the locals regard in much the same, wary manner as those in Crouch End, even if everything is ultimately explainable in terms of our own reality...
Well, that's my "spooky" Halloween article, even if it is a couple of weeks early...
Tuesday, October 17, 2017
Tueday's List: I Rank My Favorite Elvis Presley Songs
The great, late American rock and roll icon Elvis Presley began his explosive rise in fame two years before I was born, in 1954...it wouldn't be until 1963-64, when I began to earnestly listen to the radio, that I would begin to hear many of his biggest hits, played as "golden oldies" on Miami's WQAM/560 "Tiger Radio". Since that time, Presley continued to come out with new material, usually without the resounding success of his earlier songs. However, because I was there, living through these later releases, they carried greater personal meaning for me: hence songs like Kentucky Rain, In the Ghetto, and Viva Las Vegas having places at the top of my favorites list...
And here's that list of my top thirty favorite Elvis Presley tunes. As usual, I put the song titles in blue capitals followed by their year of release. What are your favorites of the King?
1 KENTUCKY RAIN [70]
2 CAN'T HELP FALLING IN LOVE [61]
3 IN THE GHETTO [69]
4 (MARIE'S THE NAME) HIS LATEST FLAME [61]
5 VIVA LAS VEGAS [64]
6 DON'T BE CRUEL [56]
7 JAILHOUSE ROCK [57]
8 HOUND DOG [56]
9 (LET ME BE YOUR) TEDDY BEAR [57]
10 RETURN TO SENDER [62]
11 THAT'S ALL RIGHT [54]
12 LITTLE SISTER [61]
13 MYSTERY TRAIN [55]
14 I'M LEAVING [71]
15 SUSPICIOUS MINDS [69]
16 BOSSA NOVA BABY [63]
17 HEARTBREAK HOTEL [55]
18 BLUE MOON [56]
19 ALL SHOOK UP [57]
20 GOOD LUCK CHARM [62]
21 BLUE SUEDE SHOES [56]
22 LOVE ME TENDER [56]
23 IT'S NOW OR NEVER [60]
24 BURNING LOVE [72]
25 CRYING IN THE CHAPEL [65]
26 ARE YOU LONESOME TONIGHT? [60]
27 KISSIN' COUSINS [64]
28 I WANT YOU, I NEED YOU, I LOVE YOU [56]
29 (YOU'RE) THE DEVIL IN DISGUISE [63]
30 HARD HEADED WOMAN [58]
And here's that list of my top thirty favorite Elvis Presley tunes. As usual, I put the song titles in blue capitals followed by their year of release. What are your favorites of the King?
1 KENTUCKY RAIN [70]
2 CAN'T HELP FALLING IN LOVE [61]
3 IN THE GHETTO [69]
4 (MARIE'S THE NAME) HIS LATEST FLAME [61]
5 VIVA LAS VEGAS [64]
6 DON'T BE CRUEL [56]
7 JAILHOUSE ROCK [57]
8 HOUND DOG [56]
9 (LET ME BE YOUR) TEDDY BEAR [57]
10 RETURN TO SENDER [62]
11 THAT'S ALL RIGHT [54]
12 LITTLE SISTER [61]
13 MYSTERY TRAIN [55]
14 I'M LEAVING [71]
15 SUSPICIOUS MINDS [69]
16 BOSSA NOVA BABY [63]
17 HEARTBREAK HOTEL [55]
18 BLUE MOON [56]
19 ALL SHOOK UP [57]
20 GOOD LUCK CHARM [62]
21 BLUE SUEDE SHOES [56]
22 LOVE ME TENDER [56]
23 IT'S NOW OR NEVER [60]
24 BURNING LOVE [72]
25 CRYING IN THE CHAPEL [65]
26 ARE YOU LONESOME TONIGHT? [60]
27 KISSIN' COUSINS [64]
28 I WANT YOU, I NEED YOU, I LOVE YOU [56]
29 (YOU'RE) THE DEVIL IN DISGUISE [63]
30 HARD HEADED WOMAN [58]
Monday, October 16, 2017
Just Finished Reading The Vanishing Year by Kate Moretti
The Vanishing Year, by Kate Moretti, is one of those books I read after choosing it almost at random from my public library's shelves. It's a mystery on different levels: a young woman, Zoe Whittaker, has had a rough past, being abandoned by her mother soon after birth and brought up by her adoptive mother in poverty after the adoptive father was killed in an accident. She went through a period a few years before when she consumed and peddled drugs, and got in trouble both with the law and with her suppliers, having testified against them. Now, with a new identity provided by the authorities, she is affluent and married to a wealthy young Manhattan businessman, Henry Whittaker. But Henry, alternately very affectionate and then cold and controlling, has his own secrets that he is keeping from Zoe. Who was Zoe's birth mother, who was Tara, Henry's mysterious first wife who he said had died in a traffic accident? And what about the two thugs she put in prison...have they discovered where she now is? These and more questions keeping coming up in the story until the reader isn't quite sure what is real and who is who...
It's fun to read this kind of fiction. The book isn't very long and not part of a long series, so the time investment isn't great. I liked Zoe, a realistic character with her own admitted shortcomings...no superhero here, thankfully. And I enjoyed all the unraveling mysteries, plot twists, and misdirection until it all gets clearly laid out in the final pages. After finishing the book, I thought yes, that explains why Henry married Zoe and treated her in such a peculiar way. It's apparent to me that Moretti had outlined her book from start to finish before starting on it...there's no way she could have just begun to write it and then let the story develop on its own. Some authors, like Stephen King, don't believe in outlining their stories while others, like Isaac Asimov, were methodical about preparing in advance what they were going to write. I can see the advantages of both approaches, but with King's method it's a bit harder to predict the ending. In any event, The Vanishing Year...which came out just last year...was a good read, and I can see it successfully being adapted to the screen...
It's fun to read this kind of fiction. The book isn't very long and not part of a long series, so the time investment isn't great. I liked Zoe, a realistic character with her own admitted shortcomings...no superhero here, thankfully. And I enjoyed all the unraveling mysteries, plot twists, and misdirection until it all gets clearly laid out in the final pages. After finishing the book, I thought yes, that explains why Henry married Zoe and treated her in such a peculiar way. It's apparent to me that Moretti had outlined her book from start to finish before starting on it...there's no way she could have just begun to write it and then let the story develop on its own. Some authors, like Stephen King, don't believe in outlining their stories while others, like Isaac Asimov, were methodical about preparing in advance what they were going to write. I can see the advantages of both approaches, but with King's method it's a bit harder to predict the ending. In any event, The Vanishing Year...which came out just last year...was a good read, and I can see it successfully being adapted to the screen...
Sunday, October 15, 2017
Yet Another Disappointing Offensive Season for Gator Football
I'm a football fan of sorts and follow certain teams, professional and college, over the years. Predictably, my favorites tend to be my hometown teams...first the Miami Dolphins from my childhood in south Florida, and then the University of Florida in my adopted Gainesville. We Gators, frustrated over the years at never having been able to win a Southeastern Conference Championship...the situation aggravated by the 1984 team's title being forfeited because of rules violations...finally not only won repeated conference titles under legendary coach Steve Spurrier with his trademark exciting razzle-dazzle offense, but even the national championship after the 1996 season. When Spurrier left in 2002 to try his hand at coaching in the National Football League, Ron Zook was hired and, while moderately successful, was vilified by the fans as simply not good enough...he got the axe after just three years and then monumentally successful (and very ambitious) Utah coach Urban Meyer came on to replace him. All he did was win two national championships during his second and fourth of six seasons at Florida. And then, beginning with Meyer's final season in 2010, the Gators passing offense disappeared...
From 2011 through 2014 defensive-minded Will Muschamp coached Florida through one impressive year (2012) and one disastrous year (2013), sandwiched between two yawners before he was canned and our present leader, Jim McElwain, was hired. McElwain is now in his third season and inherited his predecessor's recruits...meaning a great defense and a stagnant offense. Will Grier was the starting quarterback early in the 2015 season and was effective while improving in his position, until he was suspended for having taken performance-enhancing drugs. After Grier was gone (he's now playing for West Virginia), the Gators faded but still managed somehow to win their conference's East Division. In 2016, Luke Del Rio, unpolished but intelligent, looked as if he could be a quarterback to lead the team to success throughout the season...but he was injured in midseason and that was it for the Gators, although once again they defied the odds and took home another division title. This year, though, everything was going to be different. We not only had Del Rio coming back healthy, but there was a new freshman, Feleipe Franks, who was supposed to have done great things in high school and could end up as a superstar. Only he didn't develop as well as hoped after recruitment and, although initially named starter and even responsible for a game-saving last-second 63-yard bomb to beat rival Tennessee, was finally benched in favor of Del Rio. But once again, Del Rio was injured for the year and Florida has had once again to struggle with a horribly inconsistent offense. Add to that the fact that several Gators were suspended at the start of the season for credit card fraud and it seems that Coach McElwain is always finding himself shorthanded...either from injury, violations, or the lack of his players' improvement...
Looking back, I think that Ron Zook should have been given at least a couple more years to see whether his own recruits could bring glory back to Florida. When a new coach is hired he is more or less at the mercy of how well his predecessor's recruits do, although there is a lot more to how well a team does than just the sheer individual talent of its component players. Jim McElwain might be regarded on one hand as extremely unlucky...or he may on the other be too undisciplined and disorganized. When he was hired he was to bring high-powered passing back to the Gators, but we're now in season number three and it doesn't look any better than it did when Muschamp was struggling. And the defense is nowhere as good as it used to be...
I doubt that Florida will be able to win their division again this year...they're only 3-3 and next play a special Georgia team that could well compete for the national championship this year. I think that Jim McElwain should get at least two more seasons to turn this team around, but he has to develop his players' skills, be more involved in their personal conduct...and, frankly, do a better job with recruitment, both on offense and defense...
As far as I'm concerned, I don't need for Florida to win the national championship every year, as some unrealistic fans seem to feel. But I do want them to be competitive, interesting and at least be contenders as the season approaches its culmination in December. Injuries happen to every team: it's a part of the game, but while some coaches seem able to compensate for them, with others...well there's always excuses and "wait'll next year"...
From 2011 through 2014 defensive-minded Will Muschamp coached Florida through one impressive year (2012) and one disastrous year (2013), sandwiched between two yawners before he was canned and our present leader, Jim McElwain, was hired. McElwain is now in his third season and inherited his predecessor's recruits...meaning a great defense and a stagnant offense. Will Grier was the starting quarterback early in the 2015 season and was effective while improving in his position, until he was suspended for having taken performance-enhancing drugs. After Grier was gone (he's now playing for West Virginia), the Gators faded but still managed somehow to win their conference's East Division. In 2016, Luke Del Rio, unpolished but intelligent, looked as if he could be a quarterback to lead the team to success throughout the season...but he was injured in midseason and that was it for the Gators, although once again they defied the odds and took home another division title. This year, though, everything was going to be different. We not only had Del Rio coming back healthy, but there was a new freshman, Feleipe Franks, who was supposed to have done great things in high school and could end up as a superstar. Only he didn't develop as well as hoped after recruitment and, although initially named starter and even responsible for a game-saving last-second 63-yard bomb to beat rival Tennessee, was finally benched in favor of Del Rio. But once again, Del Rio was injured for the year and Florida has had once again to struggle with a horribly inconsistent offense. Add to that the fact that several Gators were suspended at the start of the season for credit card fraud and it seems that Coach McElwain is always finding himself shorthanded...either from injury, violations, or the lack of his players' improvement...
Looking back, I think that Ron Zook should have been given at least a couple more years to see whether his own recruits could bring glory back to Florida. When a new coach is hired he is more or less at the mercy of how well his predecessor's recruits do, although there is a lot more to how well a team does than just the sheer individual talent of its component players. Jim McElwain might be regarded on one hand as extremely unlucky...or he may on the other be too undisciplined and disorganized. When he was hired he was to bring high-powered passing back to the Gators, but we're now in season number three and it doesn't look any better than it did when Muschamp was struggling. And the defense is nowhere as good as it used to be...
I doubt that Florida will be able to win their division again this year...they're only 3-3 and next play a special Georgia team that could well compete for the national championship this year. I think that Jim McElwain should get at least two more seasons to turn this team around, but he has to develop his players' skills, be more involved in their personal conduct...and, frankly, do a better job with recruitment, both on offense and defense...
As far as I'm concerned, I don't need for Florida to win the national championship every year, as some unrealistic fans seem to feel. But I do want them to be competitive, interesting and at least be contenders as the season approaches its culmination in December. Injuries happen to every team: it's a part of the game, but while some coaches seem able to compensate for them, with others...well there's always excuses and "wait'll next year"...
Saturday, October 14, 2017
Just Finished Rereading The Dead Zone by Stephen King
I first read Stephen King's 1979 novel The Dead Zone several years ago and, when a co-worker mentioned it as one of his favorites, I realized that I had forgotten a lot of what happened in it...only that I had also liked it. So, as I have recently done with other King novels like 11/22/63, Salem's Lot, Insomnia, and Needful Things, I reread it...it really was pretty doggone good...
Johnny Smith is a young man...residing in Stephen King's home state of Maine, naturally...who had a childhood accident that occasionally gives him precognitive powers. Employed as a high school teacher, he takes his date, Sarah...also a teacher at the same school...to the carnival where he freaks everyone out by repeatedly hitting the right numbers at a gambling stand. The circumstances during that night culminate in Johnny being critically injured while riding a taxi home...and he doesn't come out of his coma until five years later. Meanwhile, Sarah has married and had a child...and history has marched on as well...
The Dead Zone follows another character, the antagonist Greg Stillson, as he "progresses" from a dog-killing Bible salesman to a heavy-handed small town mayor in New Hampshire. Stillson has big plans for himself and decides to run for U.S. Representative in his district. While this is going on, Johnny comes out of his coma...with much stronger abilities...to see into others' lives, even their futures...simply by touching them. When he encounters Greg Stillson at a campaign rally, he sees a terribly ominous future for the country and the world...
As was the case in Firestarter...written by Stephen King at about the same general time...the protagonist cannot hide his paranormal abilities from others and as a result suffers persecution. But Johnny cannot help wanting to warn others of impending doom...some heed his words, some don't, but almost all come away with the feeling that he is one very scary guy, to be avoided. What I liked the most about this story was how the author developed the characters and put people like Sarah, Johnny's father, and his neurologist Sam Weizak into his life who genuinely cared and supported him...it wasn't just Johnny vs. the world...
I never saw the movie version of The Dead Zone, which came out in 1983 and starred Christopher Walken as Johnny Smith and Martin Sheen as Greg Stillson. I do know that the ending was changed around a bit, though...but that doesn't surprise me. I also read that the television version of this story is markedly different from the book. Although a couple of people I know who saw the movie said they liked it, I'd still recommend that you read the book first. Oh, by the way...that term "dead zone" referred to a part of Johnny's brain that had been damaged during his accidents and which caused certain lapses in his memory...
Johnny Smith is a young man...residing in Stephen King's home state of Maine, naturally...who had a childhood accident that occasionally gives him precognitive powers. Employed as a high school teacher, he takes his date, Sarah...also a teacher at the same school...to the carnival where he freaks everyone out by repeatedly hitting the right numbers at a gambling stand. The circumstances during that night culminate in Johnny being critically injured while riding a taxi home...and he doesn't come out of his coma until five years later. Meanwhile, Sarah has married and had a child...and history has marched on as well...
The Dead Zone follows another character, the antagonist Greg Stillson, as he "progresses" from a dog-killing Bible salesman to a heavy-handed small town mayor in New Hampshire. Stillson has big plans for himself and decides to run for U.S. Representative in his district. While this is going on, Johnny comes out of his coma...with much stronger abilities...to see into others' lives, even their futures...simply by touching them. When he encounters Greg Stillson at a campaign rally, he sees a terribly ominous future for the country and the world...
As was the case in Firestarter...written by Stephen King at about the same general time...the protagonist cannot hide his paranormal abilities from others and as a result suffers persecution. But Johnny cannot help wanting to warn others of impending doom...some heed his words, some don't, but almost all come away with the feeling that he is one very scary guy, to be avoided. What I liked the most about this story was how the author developed the characters and put people like Sarah, Johnny's father, and his neurologist Sam Weizak into his life who genuinely cared and supported him...it wasn't just Johnny vs. the world...
I never saw the movie version of The Dead Zone, which came out in 1983 and starred Christopher Walken as Johnny Smith and Martin Sheen as Greg Stillson. I do know that the ending was changed around a bit, though...but that doesn't surprise me. I also read that the television version of this story is markedly different from the book. Although a couple of people I know who saw the movie said they liked it, I'd still recommend that you read the book first. Oh, by the way...that term "dead zone" referred to a part of Johnny's brain that had been damaged during his accidents and which caused certain lapses in his memory...
Friday, October 13, 2017
Quote of the Week...from Derek Jeter
There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do - and I believe that. ---Derek Jeter
One of the big reasons that I still root for the New York Yankees is that Derek Jeter played out his major league career there...he was my favorite baseball player during his tenure from 1995 through 2014. Now he is part-owner and CEO of the Miami Marlins, determined to make that franchise a winner...good luck with that, Derek! And about those Yankees, "my" team in this years Major League Baseball playoffs...congratulations for defeating favored Cleveland after being behind two games to none...
As for Derek's quote, I agree that he believes what he says and has played his baseball career with fervor and integrity. Hard work often more than makes up for a lack of talent...at least until you get to the elite level in an endeavor: sorry, but concert pianists, singers, and professional athletes need that giftedness as well...Derek Jeter was also a gifted player. Still, his quote has broad applications to our everyday lives. I know people around me who are serious about working hard, and I greatly respect them for that. There are some reactions, though, that I'd like to bring up about this topic...
Part of "working hard", in my opinion, is prayerful reflection on my priorities and exactly where I should be directing my efforts. In the workplace this is a no-brainer: I should always work hard at my job...end of that discussion. But it's also important to make a personal assessment of my own interests and goals...and not let myself get distracted with expending too much time and attention on extraneous or trivial matters. Also, working hard does not always match up with results: if I always evaluate my progress in an area by the instant feedback I receive, I'm bound to be disappointed and discouraged...instead just work hard and let the results take care of themselves. And whenever I do get a reputation as a hard-worker, in a funny sort of way that seems to open me up for criticism by others, some of whom are jealous, others who don't want to be shown up for their own lack of motivation...and still others who want to assure me that my efforts are misplaced and I should be working in a "higher" venue elsewhere doing something different. And then there's the fact that past accomplishments breed future expectations: if you don't want people paying too much critical attention to you or expecting more good things from you, then don't work hard at anything! But what kind of life is that?
One of the big reasons that I still root for the New York Yankees is that Derek Jeter played out his major league career there...he was my favorite baseball player during his tenure from 1995 through 2014. Now he is part-owner and CEO of the Miami Marlins, determined to make that franchise a winner...good luck with that, Derek! And about those Yankees, "my" team in this years Major League Baseball playoffs...congratulations for defeating favored Cleveland after being behind two games to none...
As for Derek's quote, I agree that he believes what he says and has played his baseball career with fervor and integrity. Hard work often more than makes up for a lack of talent...at least until you get to the elite level in an endeavor: sorry, but concert pianists, singers, and professional athletes need that giftedness as well...Derek Jeter was also a gifted player. Still, his quote has broad applications to our everyday lives. I know people around me who are serious about working hard, and I greatly respect them for that. There are some reactions, though, that I'd like to bring up about this topic...
Part of "working hard", in my opinion, is prayerful reflection on my priorities and exactly where I should be directing my efforts. In the workplace this is a no-brainer: I should always work hard at my job...end of that discussion. But it's also important to make a personal assessment of my own interests and goals...and not let myself get distracted with expending too much time and attention on extraneous or trivial matters. Also, working hard does not always match up with results: if I always evaluate my progress in an area by the instant feedback I receive, I'm bound to be disappointed and discouraged...instead just work hard and let the results take care of themselves. And whenever I do get a reputation as a hard-worker, in a funny sort of way that seems to open me up for criticism by others, some of whom are jealous, others who don't want to be shown up for their own lack of motivation...and still others who want to assure me that my efforts are misplaced and I should be working in a "higher" venue elsewhere doing something different. And then there's the fact that past accomplishments breed future expectations: if you don't want people paying too much critical attention to you or expecting more good things from you, then don't work hard at anything! But what kind of life is that?
Thursday, October 12, 2017
10/8 Sermon on David, Part 4
At The Family Church here in Gainesville, senior pastor Philip Griffin continued his study of the important Old Testament figure of David, king of Israel. Sunday's message was titled Desiring God's Presence and inferred from David's attitude and experiences how we in our present age can desire and experience God's presence as well. The scripture of focus was 2 Samuel Chapter 6...you can read it in the New International Version through the following link to Bible Gateway: [link]...
The passage in the scripture refers to the returning of the Ark of the Covenant, from which God would speak to his people, to Jerusalem after David has become king of Israel. Pastor Philip noted that God's own instructions for handling and transporting the Ark, clearly laid out in scripture, were violated as non-Levites moved it on an oxcart...in the same way that the unbelieving Philistines did. One of the men transporting it reached out to prevent it from touching the ground...and was instantly smitten with death. Some have issues with this passage, implying that God is cruel and vindictive...but is he that way, or instead, like the lion Aslan in C.S. Lewis's Narnia series, good but dangerous. Philip pointed this out and then read on as to how David, seeing the error of what he had done, repented and had the Ark carried in the proper manner into Jerusalem. And he openly rejoiced and danced, unashamed before all about his love for God...
In discussing the presence of God and how one desiring that presence can achieve it, Pastor Philip emphasized that while God is omnipresent, being in a covenant relationship with him requires his grace...and overcoming the problem of sin, which separates us from God. Through Christ and our repentance God can work his grace in our lives and make his presence known to us...and we may rejoice as well...
This sermon can be viewed through the church's YouTube video website...here's a link to it: [link]. The Family Church holds its Sunday morning services...with the weekly message, praise music, prayer, and fellowship...at 9:30 and 11. There is also a hospitality room next to the lobby where coffee is available...
The passage in the scripture refers to the returning of the Ark of the Covenant, from which God would speak to his people, to Jerusalem after David has become king of Israel. Pastor Philip noted that God's own instructions for handling and transporting the Ark, clearly laid out in scripture, were violated as non-Levites moved it on an oxcart...in the same way that the unbelieving Philistines did. One of the men transporting it reached out to prevent it from touching the ground...and was instantly smitten with death. Some have issues with this passage, implying that God is cruel and vindictive...but is he that way, or instead, like the lion Aslan in C.S. Lewis's Narnia series, good but dangerous. Philip pointed this out and then read on as to how David, seeing the error of what he had done, repented and had the Ark carried in the proper manner into Jerusalem. And he openly rejoiced and danced, unashamed before all about his love for God...
In discussing the presence of God and how one desiring that presence can achieve it, Pastor Philip emphasized that while God is omnipresent, being in a covenant relationship with him requires his grace...and overcoming the problem of sin, which separates us from God. Through Christ and our repentance God can work his grace in our lives and make his presence known to us...and we may rejoice as well...
This sermon can be viewed through the church's YouTube video website...here's a link to it: [link]. The Family Church holds its Sunday morning services...with the weekly message, praise music, prayer, and fellowship...at 9:30 and 11. There is also a hospitality room next to the lobby where coffee is available...
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
Wednesday's Short Story: The Man Upstairs by Ray Bradbury
Ray Bradbury was a peculiar soul, as well as a brilliant writer. I remember sitting in the hospital with Melissa, just after Will was born in April of 1990, and the television there was on some obscure channel showing an interview with Bradbury. The noted author made an incredible claim: he had a perfect photographic memory...he even remembered being born! Whether he was just joking or not, I'll never know...but I wonder what life would be like for someone like that. In any event, I've read a lot of his works, notably Something Wicked This Way Comes, Fahrenheit 451, Dandelion Wine, and a plethora of short stories. One of them, The Man Upstairs, from 1947, appeared in the 1955 collection titled The October Country (Ballantine Books). In it, the reader is once again drawn to Bradbury's familiar Midwestern small town setting in the late 1920s with the protagonist being a little boy...
The story's title refers to a mysterious, exacting, and sullen man who arrives to rent out a room at the boarding house run by young Douglas's grandparents. The boy takes an instant disliking to this new interloper in his life and goes out of his way to antagonize him as much as possible. Douglas never was squeamish by any stretch of the imagination, so he was delighted to watch his grandmother work on preparing a chicken for roasting, first by reaching in and removing its internal organs, and then putting in the bread stuffing. Now what does a mysterious new resident in town have to do with the innards of a chicken? Leave it to Ray Bradbury to provide the pretty disturbing answer...
There were two main reactions I got from this story: one was that each of us is at a particular spot on the "squeamishness" scale, on one end impervious to any kind of gore or exposure to biological waste or decay...and on the other end prone to nausea just thinking or reading about these types of things. I'm a little on the side of being too sensitive...and even writing or speaking about this subject makes me a bit uneasy. On the other hand, Ray Bradbury and Stephen King seem to have no problem at all with it, easily conjuring up all sorts of distasteful images in their stories. My second reaction to The Man Upstairs is how easy it is to feel alienation and unacceptance within one's society...both in a general sense as well as in various specific situations. When you're the odd man out, as was the antagonist in this story...well, you're "strange", like in that old Doors hit single. It seems that one of the needs of social groups is to have a convenient outcast at hand, someone to berate and ostracize for being "different", serving in a perverse way to bond the others within the group closer...it makes it all the easier if the scapegoat has no interest in being accepted by anyone else...
The Man Upstairs is available for you to read...just click on the following link: [link]
The story's title refers to a mysterious, exacting, and sullen man who arrives to rent out a room at the boarding house run by young Douglas's grandparents. The boy takes an instant disliking to this new interloper in his life and goes out of his way to antagonize him as much as possible. Douglas never was squeamish by any stretch of the imagination, so he was delighted to watch his grandmother work on preparing a chicken for roasting, first by reaching in and removing its internal organs, and then putting in the bread stuffing. Now what does a mysterious new resident in town have to do with the innards of a chicken? Leave it to Ray Bradbury to provide the pretty disturbing answer...
There were two main reactions I got from this story: one was that each of us is at a particular spot on the "squeamishness" scale, on one end impervious to any kind of gore or exposure to biological waste or decay...and on the other end prone to nausea just thinking or reading about these types of things. I'm a little on the side of being too sensitive...and even writing or speaking about this subject makes me a bit uneasy. On the other hand, Ray Bradbury and Stephen King seem to have no problem at all with it, easily conjuring up all sorts of distasteful images in their stories. My second reaction to The Man Upstairs is how easy it is to feel alienation and unacceptance within one's society...both in a general sense as well as in various specific situations. When you're the odd man out, as was the antagonist in this story...well, you're "strange", like in that old Doors hit single. It seems that one of the needs of social groups is to have a convenient outcast at hand, someone to berate and ostracize for being "different", serving in a perverse way to bond the others within the group closer...it makes it all the easier if the scapegoat has no interest in being accepted by anyone else...
The Man Upstairs is available for you to read...just click on the following link: [link]
Tuesday, October 10, 2017
Tuesday's List: My Top Thirty Favorite Rolling Stones Songs
The Rolling Stones seem like a permanent fixture in our world, enduring when other bands have come and gone with a sort of uneasy-but-stable, ongoing peace between leaders Mick Jagger and Keith Richards. I remember back after their Voodoo Lounge tour was announced following that album's release 23 years ago...it was derisively referred to as the "one-foot-in-the-grave tour"...yet the band plays on and I don't hear anybody joking anymore. I was seven years old when they appeared on the Ed Sullivan Show on the heels of the Beatles' appearance in early 1964...some of their songs from that era remain as favorites of mine. Although the Stones were never my favorite band, and I haven't heard much of their material from the numerous albums they've made over the years...yet at their best they were tops in their field, and quite often extremely hilarious. May they keep on pluggin' away...I hear they're planning on a new album...
So here's my list of my thirty favorite Rolling Stones songs, with the titles in blue capitals and the year of release (in America) following them. Note that nowhere in this list are some of their biggest hits like Satisfaction, Brown Sugar, It's Only Rock n' Roll, and Start Me Up...I never could figure out why these were so popular...
1 IT'S ALL OVER NOW [64]
2 STREET FIGHTING MAN [68]
3 PRODIGAL SON [68]
4 TIME IS ON MY SIDE [64]
5 JUMPIN' JACK FLASH [68]
6 SHATTERED [78]
7 UNDERCOVER OF THE NIGHT [83]
8 MOTHER'S LITTLE HELPER [66]
9 RUBY TUESDAY [66]
10 NOT FADE AWAY [64]
11 WHEN THE WHIP COMES DOWN [78]
12 SHE'S A RAINBOW [67]
13 WAITING ON A FRIEND [81]
14 YOU GOT ME ROCKING [94]
15 ALMOST HEAR YOU SIGH [89]
16 AS TEARS GO BY [65]
17 GIMME SHELTER [69]
18 BITCH [71]
19 HAVE YOU SEEN YOUR MOTHER, BABY, STANDING IN THE SHADOW [67]
20 PAINT IT BLACK [66]
21 LITTLE RED ROOSTER [64]
22 UNDER MY THUMB [66]
23 COME ON [64]
24 HAPPY [72]
25 SHE'S SO COLD [80]
26 MISS YOU [78]
27 YOU CAN'T ALWAYS GET WHAT YOU WANT [69]
28 ANGIE [73]
29 EMOTIONAL RESCUE [80]
30 I'M FREE [65]
So here's my list of my thirty favorite Rolling Stones songs, with the titles in blue capitals and the year of release (in America) following them. Note that nowhere in this list are some of their biggest hits like Satisfaction, Brown Sugar, It's Only Rock n' Roll, and Start Me Up...I never could figure out why these were so popular...
1 IT'S ALL OVER NOW [64]
2 STREET FIGHTING MAN [68]
3 PRODIGAL SON [68]
4 TIME IS ON MY SIDE [64]
5 JUMPIN' JACK FLASH [68]
6 SHATTERED [78]
7 UNDERCOVER OF THE NIGHT [83]
8 MOTHER'S LITTLE HELPER [66]
9 RUBY TUESDAY [66]
10 NOT FADE AWAY [64]
11 WHEN THE WHIP COMES DOWN [78]
12 SHE'S A RAINBOW [67]
13 WAITING ON A FRIEND [81]
14 YOU GOT ME ROCKING [94]
15 ALMOST HEAR YOU SIGH [89]
16 AS TEARS GO BY [65]
17 GIMME SHELTER [69]
18 BITCH [71]
19 HAVE YOU SEEN YOUR MOTHER, BABY, STANDING IN THE SHADOW [67]
20 PAINT IT BLACK [66]
21 LITTLE RED ROOSTER [64]
22 UNDER MY THUMB [66]
23 COME ON [64]
24 HAPPY [72]
25 SHE'S SO COLD [80]
26 MISS YOU [78]
27 YOU CAN'T ALWAYS GET WHAT YOU WANT [69]
28 ANGIE [73]
29 EMOTIONAL RESCUE [80]
30 I'M FREE [65]
Monday, October 9, 2017
Major League Baseball Playoffs So Far
Let's see...it's 2017 and the two 2016 World Series contenders, the Cleveland Indians and the Chicago Cubs, are still strongly in the running for a rematch. Will Joe Madden's Cubs repeat as champs? Well, in spite of their comeback in the second half of the regular season to win their division, the National League team that people are talking about isn't them but rather the Los Angeles Dodgers, who won 104 games, at one time going on a 43-7 run. L.A. has a 2-0 divisional playoff lead over wild card winner Arizona...and the games haven't been close. Action goes back to Arizona today to see if the Diamondbacks can't pick up at least one victory in this best-of-five series. In the other NL series, Washington and Chicago are knotted up at 1-1 with the Cubs hosting today's game. In the American League, the New York Yankees, a traditional favorite of mine, squeaked out a 1-0 win over the Indians to stay alive in their series, but they're still 2-1 behind Cleveland. And Boston turned the tables on Houston yesterday to stay alive as well, also now trailing 2-1. All series feature games today:
Houston at Boston, 1 pm, on Fox Sports 1
Washington at Chicago, 4 pm, on TBS
Cleveland at New York, 7 pm, on Fox Sports 1
Los Angeles at Arizona, 10 pm, on TBS
In Gainesville, Cox Cable has Fox Sports 1 and TBS on channels 62 and 67, respectively. Unfortunately, I'll be at work and will miss this day-long extravaganza of championship-level baseball (but work's a good thing, too). Three of the four series just might be decided today...I'm rooting for the Yankees and Nationals to make it to the World Series, which I recognize as being highly unlikely. My "backup" favorites are the Red Sox in the American League and Arizona in the National...even less likely to happen. Should Cleveland and Los Angeles play in the World Series...the most probable matchup... I'll go for the Indians...
Houston at Boston, 1 pm, on Fox Sports 1
Washington at Chicago, 4 pm, on TBS
Cleveland at New York, 7 pm, on Fox Sports 1
Los Angeles at Arizona, 10 pm, on TBS
In Gainesville, Cox Cable has Fox Sports 1 and TBS on channels 62 and 67, respectively. Unfortunately, I'll be at work and will miss this day-long extravaganza of championship-level baseball (but work's a good thing, too). Three of the four series just might be decided today...I'm rooting for the Yankees and Nationals to make it to the World Series, which I recognize as being highly unlikely. My "backup" favorites are the Red Sox in the American League and Arizona in the National...even less likely to happen. Should Cleveland and Los Angeles play in the World Series...the most probable matchup... I'll go for the Indians...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
