Friday, August 15, 2025
Looking for Useful Stuff in Free Brochures and Newspapers
Monday, June 2, 2025
Start of 2025 Hurricane Season
Thursday, April 21, 2022
Old July, 1965 Newspaper Articles Revealing about Vietnam War
The other day I got on my Newspapers.com site to see...through the Fort Lauderdale News, which was my home Broward County's main newspaper back in the 1960s when I was growing up there...whether any mention was made of the new Nova elementary school that was to open in August of 1965. I switched from Boulevard Heights to Nova that year when I entered the fourth grade...my sister Anita was already going to Nova Junior High, situated right across the field from the new elementary school in Davie on the site of a converted airfield (along with Broward Junior College). I began by putting on my screen the front page of the paper's July 1, 1965 Main Edition, on which most of the stories were about the escalating Vietnam War with the U.S. increasing its presence in that troubled southeastern Asia country with armed soldiers on the ground increasing from around three thousand in March of '65 to two hundred thousand by year's end. On July 1 the paper was reporting Viet Cong attacks against the American base in Da Nang, opposition in Congress to President Johnson's war policies, and there was a piece describing how the Viet Cong operate in guerilla warfare. In the Senate, Senator Wayne Morse, of the President's own Democratic Party but one of the two voting against his Gulf of Tonkin Resolution the previous August that authorized troop buildup in Vietnam, urged Johnson to end the war and instead go to the United Nations and build up collaborative relationships with other countries to bring about peace. On the Republican side in the House, their leader, future president Gerald Ford, proposed that the President remove the ground troops and restrict the fighting there to heavy aerial bombardment in strategic locations...needless to say Lyndon Johnson passed on both of these, precipitating one of the most traumatic, divisive periods in our nation's history. Malcolm W. Browne's article about Viet Cong guerilla warfare was haunting in its prescience as he describes one such warrior, stationed within an echo chamber in a hole in the ground, enabling him to detect distant helicopter sounds before any others: "The man, wriggling through a short tunnel to the surface, can yell an alarm. Instantly, shadowy men lounging or cooking at the bases of the tall trees are on their feet and moving fast. The heavy equipment from last night's battle has been stowed for future use in deep, camouflaged holes. The bodies have been buried. The men move rapidly, scattering in many directions in twos and threes. This is their base area, and they know every feature of the dense jungle in the area...the hidden trails, the camouflaged bunkers and tunnels, the gun emplacements, the mines and booby traps." You can easily see the wisdom from hindsight in reading this article and others and think of what might have been if information in plain sight, as well as alternative options, were taken more seriously by those with the power and authority to properly understand and use them...think of all the lives that could have been spared. But hindsight it is, and in 1965 the American public was strongly behind Lyndon Johnson's Vietnam escalation policy...I wonder what information today, also in plain view as was the material in July of 1965, is warning us about where we're going...but of course nowadays we have to sift through all the false crap floating around. As for my then-new little Nova school, I'm continuing to search for any reference to it...
Monday, September 6, 2021
Just Saying...From a January 1970 Newspaper Report
Tuesday, June 29, 2021
Game of the Week: Ice Hockey
Thursday, December 3, 2020
Trying to Obtain Use from Basically Useless Resources
Like squeezing water from a rock, some of the media resources surrounding me offer little hope of positive, constructive use...yet in almost all of them there can be opportunities for enlightenment and application if I just apply myself and face the challenge of plowing through mostly meaningless...and often downright dishonest...drivel. Take conservative talk radio, for example. Shows like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin and Michael Savage depend on listeners plugging their brains into them for two to three hours daily and putting their own independent thinking to sleep as they voluntarily submit themselves to the hosts' brainwashing...but I don't have to go down that path: I can be a discerning listener, noticing when the host is being demagogic or dishonest and when he or she is expressing a reasonable opinion worth considering. In almost every opinion show on radio or TV, be they from a conservative or liberal perspective, there is something worthwhile...even if it only is to figure out why certain individuals around me are believing the weird things they believe. Still, with this I wouldn't rely on any of them as my primary source for news. As for other areas, I am regularly receiving company and union periodicals in the mail...I survey each of them and quickly dispose of them: maybe a little more intensive examination might reveal a useful tidbit of information I could use. As for politicians, it's always a useful intellect and character-building exercise to take the ones I support and look for things to criticize while taking those I oppose and looking for something to praise. Such an exercise doesn't create uncertainty within me, but rather strengthens my arguments pro and con about the issues and those espousing their positions on them. In browsing through old newspapers online from years gone by, I have noticed that not only do editorial page columns provide insights into the time period being investigated, but also how regular articles are written, as well as advice columns, advertisements, the classifieds, entertainment section...and even the comic strips. In a world in which the different political and self-identification factions of the population are bubbling themselves off into insulated spheres of feedback loops, each with their own "alternative facts" and subjective realities, I think it would be healthy for each of us to take at least one day every week or two (or month) and just immerse ourselves...as honestly and empathetically as possible...in the "opposition" bubble. And also try to find some educational or useful experience in everything we encounter, even if it's generally regarded as junk...
Sunday, November 29, 2020
Newspaper Archives a Fun Portal into History
With my ability now to research old newspapers at different times in recent history, I am afforded the opportunity to investigate how different ongoing events were being reported. I'm compiling a list of some interesting times that I'm looking into during the next few weeks:
--Sunday newspaper opinion pages just preceding each presidential election
--The summer of 1914 after Austrian Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated in Bosnia, with subsequent events leading to the outbreak of World War I.
--Stories about Japanese-American relations in the weeks before Pearl Harbor.
--The early weeks in the Korean War, 1950.
--Civil rights stories in the 1950s and 1960s.
--The American reaction to the Soviets' Sputnik launch in October 1957.
--The Cuban revolution under Castro and early events of his regime in 1959.
--The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962.
--Lyndon Johnson's statements about Vietnam as president in 1964, and the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
--The Democratic Party presidential race in 1968 up to the California primary and Robert Kennedy's assassination.
--George Romney's candidacy for president in 1968 and his disastrous "brainwashing" comment.
--Stories about the breakup of the Iron Curtain in the late 1980s.
--Any articles with "experts" predicting the future.
--Retroactively politically incorrect articles deemed acceptable in the times they were published.
Well, that's just a few of what I'm looking at...besides old comic strips, advertisements, and puzzles, that is. Since I was a history major in college, this archival exploration is pure joy for me...must have been kind of like how old Gandalf felt in Tolkien's Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring when he paid a visit to Minas Tirith's old library archives to read up about "magic rings" from the ancient past....
Sunday, November 22, 2020
The United States Presidents Who Owned Slaves
As I've mentioned in a few of my recent blog articles, I now enjoy an Internet service that allows me to rummage through old newspapers online...I've been focusing on October, 1956...the month of my birth...using the Miami News as my source. Beginning September 27th of that year, they had a daily feature focusing on the American presidents, starting with George Washington and ending with the then-current one, Dwight D. Eisenhower just before the presidential election. The insets...the above one is of Andrew Jackson...summarized each succeeding president and not only informed me of their respective lives and administrations, but also of the prevailing social and political climate of 1956. For example, in none of the articles was it mentioned that a president owned slaves...yet with the first 18 presidents, 12...or two thirds...were indeed slave owners at one time or another, not to mention 10 of the first 12. Here's the list of presidents who in at least one point of their lives owned slaves, as it appeared in Wikipedia:
Thursday, November 5, 2020
Some Interesting Newspaper Articles from October, 1956
Thursday, October 29, 2020
Unintentionally Funny '56 Newspaper Column about Henry Wallace, "The Prophet"
Thursday, October 8, 2020
Online Newspaper Archives a Source of Interesting Material
Friday, August 9, 2019
Quote of the Week...from President Trump
To this quote I'd like to add two pro-gun clichés and two New York Times headlines:
The Clichés:
1) If guns were outlawed only outlaws would have guns.
------and------
2) Guns don't kill people, people do.
The NY Times Headlines (August 6, early and late editions):
1) Trump Urges Unity Vs Racism
------and------
2) Assailing Hate But Not Guns
The Times headlines and article came after President Donald Trump spoke to the nation following the mass shooting murders in El Paso and Dayton this past weekend. There was so much criticism coming at the newspaper for its first headline...which critics claimed failed to capture the essence of Trump's address...that they changed it between editions. The President did speak out against racism and for national unity...but he also gave a variation on the second of my two cited clichés with the above quote, claiming that the gun doesn't pull its own trigger. No kidding, sir, yet I've heard this kind of foolish argument before by gun advocates, implying that since guns don't shoot people by themselves, then they're somehow okay and shouldn't be part of any discussion...and tagging the mentally ill with blame for gun violence doesn't correspond to the facts as I know them. No, it's the wrong guns (military-style weapons with multiple rounds increased by high-capacity magazines) in the wrong hands (only the military and law enforcement should have them, in my opinion) that is causing the problem with these evil mass shooters using them to pick off multitudes of innocent people in stores, places of worship, schools, concerts, festivals, workplaces...or any other locale where people gather in numbers. So although it's commendable that Trump spoke out against racism and hate, he has yet to explain why it's quite all right for civilians to be able to legally acquire semi-automatic rifles that can be used to inflict massive carnage quickly on large numbers of people, as preferred as they may legitimately be by some sportsmen with their game hunting. Still, from where I stand the public's security far outweighs the enhancement of some people's hunting experiences. It's true that many more murders are caused through the abuse of handguns...and to be sure, by other means than through firearms. Restricting these higher-powered weapons will not thwart evil people from trying to murder others...and sometimes tragically succeeding. But you would not be looking at these horrendous casualty figures had the mass shooters been more limited in their choice of murder weapon. Regarding that first cliché above, it sadly has much truth to it. Localities and states that greatly restrict legal gun ownership put their law-abiding citizens in a helpless situation against the criminal elements operating there who can easily bring in their weapons from outside. And even if the nation as a whole enacted stricter laws against these military-level guns, we would still be overrun with them for years...and no doubt a thriving black market would develop as well. As for more stringent background checks for gun buyers, I wonder how many of the mass shooters over the past several years would have been caught and prevented from building up their arsenals if the laws now being pushed had already been in place...probably not that many, I'm guessing. Doesn't sound like I'm very optimistic about where this is all going, does it? Well, give me something positive to latch onto, then, while I reflect on the somber conclusion that we live in a culture that idolizes and glorifies violence, inviting evil into our midst while refusing to acknowledge it for what it is...
Sunday, July 28, 2019
Wordscapes and Word Stacks Apps: Pretty Fun
This fun type of activity reminded me of the fledgling years on the Internet when we had an AOL account and would play in their various trivia games...those were the days, you know, when getting online meant undergoing eardrum-piercing, torturous sounds from the modem. Wordscapes has an associated game app called Word Stacks, which is a much more complicated version of the word search puzzle...the letters shift positions as you find the words, pretty challenging at times! I haven't seen any tournaments for Word Stacks yet, but maybe it's just a matter of time...
Sunday, March 17, 2019
Miscellaneous Thoughts on Starbucks, Howard Schultz, Gators Hoops
Well, now that I've got that little peeve out of my system, on to another one. It saddens me that a potential centrist presidential candidate like Starbuck's former CEO Howard Schultz, who appeals to me as generally responsible and ideologically a centrist, feels that neither of the two major political parties that run our political system in this country offers a place for him, his views, and his candidacy. Actually, though, I feel that Schultz might be more welcomed by the Democrats than he imagines, at least by Democratic voters...I certainly would be more receptive to his ideas for America's future. But he's stated that if he runs, it will be as an independent, and as such will more likely syphon away votes from a Democratic nominee than from Trump in the November 2020 presidential election. Sure, by running as an independent candidate Schultz will be able to escape the grueling party primary campaigning that has already begun so early, a year and a half before the election. But were he to run as a Democrat, he would exert a more moderating pull on that party's discussions of the ongoing issues...now it seems the candidates are tripping over each other trying to see how radically leftist they can sound. I could vote for Howard Schultz as a Democrat...even as a Republican...but never as an independent. Like it or not, on the presidential election level we have a two-party system: it's binary, stupid!
Unless I and all of the sports pundits I've heard are somehow tragically mistaken, it looks as if the 2018-19 University of Florida men's basketball team will manage to make the 68-school field of the NCAA major college tournament, the brackets for which will be revealed in a few hours. After a very tough out-of-conference schedule and a very competitive Southeastern Conference regular season, the Gators were 17-14 entering the conference tournament. They made the semifinal round, winning two games before bowing to Auburn in a 65-62 defeat marred by a controversial officiating "non-call" blunder when the Florida player at the end, while taking a three-point shot to tie the score and send the game into overtime, was clearly fouled as three Auburn players converged on him...reminds me of that "non-call" at the end of the Rams-Saints NFL playoff game a few weeks ago...
The upshot of all this is that I want Starbucks to repent of their arrogance, Schultz to wise up and run as a Democrat, and for the Gators to go all the way to the championship...fat chance of any of that happening, though....
********
Later...Starbucks got back to me about the newspaper, stating that marking up the price wasn't their company's policy and wanting to make amends...I accept...still, it's kind of humiliating to be confronted in public at the counter like that and they deserve some rebuke for their arrogance...
Friday, January 18, 2019
Quote of the Week...from Marilyn vos Savant
---Marilyn vos Savant
Marilyn vos Savant is probably most known for her weekly quiz/advice column in Parade magazine, inserted in numerous Sunday newspapers. She's credited as having an extremely high IQ, for what that's worth, and doesn't mince words about her opinions on a wide range of subjects...some of these I'm not terribly in agreement with, to put it diplomatically. Yet she does have a lot of wise quotes, and I picked the one above because it goes counter to popular sentiment today. Whether it's politics, reality TV, social media, school, the workplace, or any other venue, people tend to vent negatively about others in their lives or the news without couching their criticisms with some praise and understanding. Trying to see things from the other guy's viewpoint...which is empathy...is crucial to maintaining a balanced view of others, especially those we dislike. We're all mixed bags with good and bad...Marilyn's advice rings true to me: instead of harping on how bad someone else is, why not put your time to better use and see them for their positive traits? Some folks in my life are disagreeable because they don't like me either, and can probably list all sorts of reasons for this. I can't make everyone like me, and I don't want to anyway. And I can't always like others, either. But everyone's got something to appreciate and recognizing that fact can potentially point to improved relationships between us...
Sunday, July 3, 2016
Remembering Old UF Economics Profs Denslow & Rush
Back in the year 2000, when I was in the middle of finishing up my Bachelor's program at the University of Florida after a hiatus of about twenty years, I was taking two summer introductory economics courses to fulfill my basic course distribution requirements for the degree. They were Macroeconomics and Microeconomics and were "TV" courses that were broadcast over a local public service channel. The lectures were also available over the Internet, about which I was then rather challenged (and still am to a degree), so I kept to the televised lessons. Our aforementioned Dr. David Denslow taught the macroeconomics class and Dr. Mark Rush taught microeconomics. Both topics were interesting to me, but in the end it seemed that I got lost and confused on the "macro" level while attaining a reasonable degree of understanding on the "micro". That might have been due to the nature of the material itself...or it might have been the result of the professors and how they taught their courses...
For the most part, I liked both professors' classes...hey, I got "A" in both of them! But whereas Denslow went a mile a minute with his teaching, Rush paced his lectures with humorous breaks that helped us poor unenlightened students to catch up with him. One of his devices was to use the show's "Director" as a fall guy, and they were forever trading barbs with one another. Another was Rush's use of his frequent trips to Leonardo's Pizza on University Avenue to illustrate microeconomic principles. Maybe poor Denslow just couldn't compete with that approach and unfairly suffered by comparison. Besides, had I been teaching introductory college economics classes, I probably would have resembled Dave more than Mark...although certainly I would have fared badly in comparison to either of them...they both were very competent, good teachers who sparked interest in their respective subjects...
One sidelight to all this: I used to go out to a coffee shop and study there before my tests in these classes, which basically consisted of mid-terms and finals. And just which coffee shop was this? Why, the old Magnolia Parke Starbucks, where I am sitting right now writing this article. Except that, back then in mid-2000, it had just opened its doors for the first time. Since then, over the years, I've seen Dr. Rush as a customer here. Were I to make a list of my favorite school teachers, from elementary school all the way to the end of college, he would be right up there on it. As far as I know, he is still teaching microeconomics at UF. And, of course, we now know where to find Dr. Denslow on a Sunday morning...


