Although I thoroughly enjoy having classical music playing in the background wherever I am, and have at different times of my life identified certain pieces as personal favorites, I am usually somewhat lost when it comes to identifying what I'm hearing. With the classical radio station I listen to the most...Gainesville's 102.7 WUFT/Classical...I'm usually driving and if I don't catch the title and composer of whatever is on before I reach my destination, then that piece remains unknown even if I like it a lot. The following list of my personal favorite classical music pieces would assuredly be richer and longer if I knew the names of all the composers and works I've enjoyed over the years...maybe in the future I'll have such a revised list to present...
My parents...especially my mother...were big classical music fans and she loved to listen to Tchaikovsky. So I got in early to listening to such works as the 1812 Overture and the ballets Sleeping Beauty and Swan Lake. As they added to their record collection I became acquainted with Schubert and his great "unfinished" Eighth Symphony, along with Beethoven's more renowned symphonies. I took a music appreciation class at college in 1975 and learned about the prodigious works of Bach, among others. During this period I began to enjoy listening to the music of several late nineteenth-to-early twentieth century French and Russian composers. One of the French composers, Debussy, I discovered through a popular 1974 LP of electronic music that Isao Tomita made called Snowflakes are Dancing. Over the ensuing decades, my list of classical favorites grew erratically, but I've still managed to compile a small one...what are your favorites?
And here is that list of my personal favorite classical music pieces:
1 PICTURES AT AN EXHIBITION............Modest Mussorgsky/Maurice Ravel
2 POLOVTSIAN DANCES..........................Alexander Borodin
3 SYMPHONY no. 3 (OF SORROWFUL SONGS) ....Henryk Górecki
4 SYMPHONY no. 8 ("UNFINISHED") ......Franz Schubert
5 SWAN LAKE.............................................Peter Tchaikovsky
6 BOLERO....................................................Ravel
7 CANTATA no. 140 (WACHET AUF, RUFT UNS DIE STIMME) ......Johann Sebastian Bach
8 NOCTURNES............................................Claude Debussy
9 GRAND CANYON SUITE........................Ferde Grofé
10 REVERIE.................................................Debussy
11 PIANO CONCERTO no. 1......................Tchaikovsky
12 RHAPSODY IN BLUE...........................George Gershwin
13 MLADI (YOUTH)...................................Leoš Janáček
14 ARABESQUE no. 1.................................Debussy
15 THE ENGULFED CATHEDRAL...........Debussy
16 AN AMERICAN IN PARIS....................Gershwin
17 EINE KLEINE NACHTMUSIC..............Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
18 SLEEPING BEAUTY.............................Tchaikovsky
19 CLAIR DE LUNE....................................Debussy
20 SYMPHONY no. 9..................................Ludwig van Beethoven
21 CANTATA no. 147 (JESU, JOY OF MAN'S DESIRING) .......Bach
22 SYMPHONY no. 6 (PATHETIQUE) .....Tchaikovsky
23 THE PLANETS.......................................Gustav Holst
24 SYMPHONY no. 5..................................Beethoven
25 SYMPHONY no. 40................................Mozart
26 SYMPHONY no. 6 (PASTORAL) .........Beethoven
27 ALSO SPRACH ZARATHUSTRA........Richard Strauss
28 1812 OVERTURE...................................Tchaikovsky
29 THE NUTCRACKER.............................Tchaikovsky
30 SYMPHONY no. 3 (EROICA) ..............Beethoven
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
Monday, August 7, 2017
Just Finished Reading VOR by James Blish
James Blish was a science fiction writer mainly known for his popular Star Trek books that helped keep fan enthusiasm high for the original series after its cancellation in 1968. He also wrote his own original sci-fi novels and was a critic of others' works. I hadn't read anything of his until my sister Anita recently handed me a copy of his 1958 novel VOR, which my father had bought decades before...and presumably read..."way back then"...and happened to get passed on down the family line. And so I read it, although the brittle pages had a tendency to break off in my hands...
The immediate reaction I got from VOR is that Blish wrote it quickly to get it out to the publisher, make some quick dough, and pay his bills. Its premise is the landing in rural Michigan of a highly radioactive, overheated alien spaceship that instantly scorches the ground and contaminates it for miles around. The military and government agencies converge on the site and discover the alien, who is the source of the intense radioactivity and whose insides are hotter than the sun. Marty Petrucelli is a reserve airman who was a war hero but now refuses to fly...and his beautiful young wife Pat has grown distant to him and closer to his rival on the nearby base, Al Strickland. This love triangle annoyed me to no small degree because it was such an unnecessary distraction from the main story and also depicted the people involved as being awfully shallow and unlikable. In any event, the alien allows itself to be questioned and is discovered to respond to colors: it refers to its own "name" with the colors violet, orange, and red: hence the designation "VOR". Why did it come to Earth? VOR has one adamant response: it wants to be killed...but how does one kill something that on one hand seems invulnerable and on the other might well destroy the Earth with its internal energy were that successful? The dilemma leads one of the scientists, Kovorsky, to discern the true goal of the alien's mission as well as how to get rid of it without ending life on Earth...but naturally our reluctant hero Marty will first have to get in a plane and fly again...
This "war hero refuses to fly again" scenario sounds like the script from the movie Airplane, which I just discovered was a parody of an earlier 1950s movie with that same cornball scenario...who knows, maybe Blish got his idea from that same movie. And the manner in which the story is resolved in the end sounds like something that Captain Kirk said to get rid of the dangerous probe Nomad in the Star Trek episode The Changeling. I wasn't too happy with VOR, and apparently most others weren't either...my dad certainly never mentioned it...and it's not one of James Blish's more known works. If this book happens to fall into your lap and you have absolutely nothing else to do with your time, you might just consider reading it...assuming the pages don't fall apart in your hands. Otherwise, I'd just give it a pass...
The immediate reaction I got from VOR is that Blish wrote it quickly to get it out to the publisher, make some quick dough, and pay his bills. Its premise is the landing in rural Michigan of a highly radioactive, overheated alien spaceship that instantly scorches the ground and contaminates it for miles around. The military and government agencies converge on the site and discover the alien, who is the source of the intense radioactivity and whose insides are hotter than the sun. Marty Petrucelli is a reserve airman who was a war hero but now refuses to fly...and his beautiful young wife Pat has grown distant to him and closer to his rival on the nearby base, Al Strickland. This love triangle annoyed me to no small degree because it was such an unnecessary distraction from the main story and also depicted the people involved as being awfully shallow and unlikable. In any event, the alien allows itself to be questioned and is discovered to respond to colors: it refers to its own "name" with the colors violet, orange, and red: hence the designation "VOR". Why did it come to Earth? VOR has one adamant response: it wants to be killed...but how does one kill something that on one hand seems invulnerable and on the other might well destroy the Earth with its internal energy were that successful? The dilemma leads one of the scientists, Kovorsky, to discern the true goal of the alien's mission as well as how to get rid of it without ending life on Earth...but naturally our reluctant hero Marty will first have to get in a plane and fly again...
This "war hero refuses to fly again" scenario sounds like the script from the movie Airplane, which I just discovered was a parody of an earlier 1950s movie with that same cornball scenario...who knows, maybe Blish got his idea from that same movie. And the manner in which the story is resolved in the end sounds like something that Captain Kirk said to get rid of the dangerous probe Nomad in the Star Trek episode The Changeling. I wasn't too happy with VOR, and apparently most others weren't either...my dad certainly never mentioned it...and it's not one of James Blish's more known works. If this book happens to fall into your lap and you have absolutely nothing else to do with your time, you might just consider reading it...assuming the pages don't fall apart in your hands. Otherwise, I'd just give it a pass...
Sunday, August 6, 2017
The Symphony of Sorrowful Songs
My work shift ends at midnight and I waste no time getting to my car and skedaddling on home...Fred Flintstone would be proud of me. During my eight-mile drive I listen to the radio, my favorite station being on 102.7, which plays classical music here in Gainesville. After midnight they tend to play shorter pieces and excerpts from longer ones...some of them with vocals, to my annoyance. One night last week I was listening on my way home and one of these was on the air...but it had a completely different effect on me. The woman's singing was slow, haunting, and sad...no way was I going to switch to a different station. Afterwards the announcer said that it was the second movement of the late Polish composer Henryk Górecki's Third Symphony, also known as the Symphony of Sorrowful Songs. This 1976 composition has three movements, all of which I have subsequently heard...each one features a different "sorrowful song", all performed by the same soloist in Polish. The first song is a lament of Mary, mother of Jesus. The second, which I first heard that night driving home, is of a girl's prayer written on the wall of a concentration camp during World War II asking for her family. And the third is of a mother searching for her lost soldier son during the Silesian Uprising in eastern Germany immediately following World War I. All three involve the separation of families and their longing to be reunited...the last two are a searing indictment of war, something that easily comes to my mind on this 72nd anniversary of the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima...
Górecki's Third Symphony, musically speaking, is relatively simple even to my untrained, amateur ears...but the slow buildup at the beginning and the repetitiveness at its close somehow enhance the experience of the mournful singing in the middle. It is around 55 minutes in length, a good span for a CD recording. In fact, when a recording of Górecki's masterpiece was released in 1992, it set all kinds of records in sales for classical music. But until that night last week I had never heard of it...now I understand that part of it was put on the soundtrack for the superhero movie Suicide Squad...
I don't have as extensive a listening experience with classical music as I do with rock, and I'm confident that a lot of folks out there could compile a much more comprehensive list of classical greats, many of which I am unfamiliar with. But I still have my own list of favorites, which I plan to put out on this blog in a couple of days. And rest assured: the Symphony of Sorrowful Songs will be very highly placed on it...
Górecki's Third Symphony, musically speaking, is relatively simple even to my untrained, amateur ears...but the slow buildup at the beginning and the repetitiveness at its close somehow enhance the experience of the mournful singing in the middle. It is around 55 minutes in length, a good span for a CD recording. In fact, when a recording of Górecki's masterpiece was released in 1992, it set all kinds of records in sales for classical music. But until that night last week I had never heard of it...now I understand that part of it was put on the soundtrack for the superhero movie Suicide Squad...
I don't have as extensive a listening experience with classical music as I do with rock, and I'm confident that a lot of folks out there could compile a much more comprehensive list of classical greats, many of which I am unfamiliar with. But I still have my own list of favorites, which I plan to put out on this blog in a couple of days. And rest assured: the Symphony of Sorrowful Songs will be very highly placed on it...
Saturday, August 5, 2017
Just Finished Reading The Age of Miracles by Karen Thompson Walker
Karen Thompson Walker is an editor for a book publishing company who came out with her first novel, The Age of Miracles, in 2012. The story centers around a nightmare dystopian scenario in which the Earth inexplicably begins to slow down in its orbit, causing all sorts of disasters and eventually threatening the human race...as well as life on our planet in general...with extinction. In the middle of this calamity, Julia, an eleven-year-old middle-school student, is going through the pangs of early adolescence in her home California town while struggling with her social relationships. Let's see if I can recognize them from my memories of this long-gone period in my own life: bullying ✓, snobbery ✓, family dysfunction ✓, puppy-love crush ✓, indifferent teachers ✓, and feelings of isolation, inadequacy, and alienation ✓. Yep, they're all there, except that I wasn't having to deal with the end of life as we know it on Earth...although when I was her age back in 1968 I suspected that one day when I became of age, I would be drafted and sent over to Vietnam to die for my country in that endless war. Oh yeah, don't forget that while (fictional) Julia and I were going through our typical teenage angst periods, the kids around us all openly pretended as if everything was totally hunky-dory in their own lives (and what's wrong with us)...✓
So The Age of Miracles, to me, came across as a story with a split personality. On one hand there is the developing drama of a world slowing down and how humanity copes with the increasing problems of ecological disasters, earthquakes, solar radiation, and the destruction of the Earth's magnetic field...to name just a few. On the other hand, there is the intense personal drama of Julia's life, family, and school. And then there is the issue of time: as the planet's rotational day lengthens, a conflict grows between those who want to retain the strict 24-hour/day system regardless whether it is light or dark and those who want to adapt their day to keep in harmony with sunrise and sunset...those favoring the latter approach soon find themselves isolated and persecuted by the majority, which to me is the author's commentary on how irrationally cruel people can become when in groups and looking for scapegoats for their hardships...
From the beginning of this story I had my doubts about Karen Thompson Walker's adherence to established science...but hey, it's just a story and I'm not one of those "hard" science fiction readers who are obsessed with discovering "errors" in obviously fantastic tales. Instead, I try to discern what the author was trying to say. In this case, The Age of Miracles, the title of which is what early adolescence has been referred to in the past, is more about what kids have to go through during that difficult time in their lives than the sci-fi part. The impending doom of the "slowing", to me, was just Walker's way of externalizing the internal struggles that Julia was having to deal with, anyway. In the end, I liked this story and recommend it, but more because of the human angle to it, not the science fiction part. The author accomplished something crucial to a story: she created a character I could identify with...
So The Age of Miracles, to me, came across as a story with a split personality. On one hand there is the developing drama of a world slowing down and how humanity copes with the increasing problems of ecological disasters, earthquakes, solar radiation, and the destruction of the Earth's magnetic field...to name just a few. On the other hand, there is the intense personal drama of Julia's life, family, and school. And then there is the issue of time: as the planet's rotational day lengthens, a conflict grows between those who want to retain the strict 24-hour/day system regardless whether it is light or dark and those who want to adapt their day to keep in harmony with sunrise and sunset...those favoring the latter approach soon find themselves isolated and persecuted by the majority, which to me is the author's commentary on how irrationally cruel people can become when in groups and looking for scapegoats for their hardships...
From the beginning of this story I had my doubts about Karen Thompson Walker's adherence to established science...but hey, it's just a story and I'm not one of those "hard" science fiction readers who are obsessed with discovering "errors" in obviously fantastic tales. Instead, I try to discern what the author was trying to say. In this case, The Age of Miracles, the title of which is what early adolescence has been referred to in the past, is more about what kids have to go through during that difficult time in their lives than the sci-fi part. The impending doom of the "slowing", to me, was just Walker's way of externalizing the internal struggles that Julia was having to deal with, anyway. In the end, I liked this story and recommend it, but more because of the human angle to it, not the science fiction part. The author accomplished something crucial to a story: she created a character I could identify with...
Friday, August 4, 2017
Quote of the Week...from Margaret Mead
Always remember that you are absolutely unique. Just like everyone else.
---Margaret Mead
The above quote by renowned anthropologist Margaret Mead may seem terribly ironic...even humorous, by laying out a profound truth in the form of two superficially contradictory statements. Yes, each of us is unique, and it's healthy to regard oneself that way...think for yourself, I like to say, and don't ever buy into others judging you because of some category like race, gender, age, politics, religion, national origin, disability, etcetera. By the same token, there's Part Two of Ms. Mead's quote that exhorts each of us to recognize the unique nature of others and to refrain from the same arbitrary judgmental attitude that we should reject when done to us. Or, in a more Biblical sense: Do to others as you would have them do to you...
On the other hand, our uniqueness doesn't exempt us from social responsibility and we shouldn't use our specialness as an excuse to avoid them...especially when we hold the rights that are recognized for us by society in such high regard. Rights and responsibilities go hand in hand...one cannot exist without the other in a context of liberty...
It's a shame that I grew up in a social environment that refused to recognize and respect my own unique nature...instead I was subjected to taunts and bullying at school and the bus stop, and my perspective on things...even those directly concerning me...was ignored and/or discouraged by authority figures in my young life: no respect whatsoever. My experiences in this are probably not unique: many of us have to spend pretty much the rest of our adult lives struggling to set our brains straight and in a positive direction after being force-fed so much crap in our youth: heeding Margaret Mead's quote is a good step to begin with...
---Margaret Mead
The above quote by renowned anthropologist Margaret Mead may seem terribly ironic...even humorous, by laying out a profound truth in the form of two superficially contradictory statements. Yes, each of us is unique, and it's healthy to regard oneself that way...think for yourself, I like to say, and don't ever buy into others judging you because of some category like race, gender, age, politics, religion, national origin, disability, etcetera. By the same token, there's Part Two of Ms. Mead's quote that exhorts each of us to recognize the unique nature of others and to refrain from the same arbitrary judgmental attitude that we should reject when done to us. Or, in a more Biblical sense: D
Thursday, August 3, 2017
Just Finished Reading Lillian Boxfish Takes a Walk by Kathleen Rooney
Kathleen Rooney's 2017 novel Lillian Boxfish Takes a Walk is a fictionalized loose biography of Margaret Fishback, who like the protagonist was a famous poet in her time of the early-to-mid twentieth century and was, with her job at Macy's Department Store, the highest paid woman advertiser of her time and a stalwart, confirmed New Yorker. The details that first-person narrator Lillian brings out about her own life, family and friends, and philosophy of life, on the other hand may or may not be based in reality. I do know this: I really enjoyed reading this story, and on several fronts...
Ever since I visited New York City...in particular Mid-and-Lower Manhattan...seven years ago, I have keenly noticed any references to the city in the books I've read, especially those focusing on it. Lillian Boxfish Takes a Walk takes the reader on a walk through Manhattan, going back in time to the 1920s, 30s, 40s...and on up to New Years Eve 1984 as the lead character...85 years old...decides to make an adventurous and reflective trek through town. I enjoyed the geography refresher, although my 2010 Manhattan experience came after later mayors Giuliani and Bloomberg empowered the police and drove out the porno shops...no complaints from me as a pedestrian tourist about that although it appears that minority residents may have been unfairly targeted by the cops in their zeal. But the main attraction of this book to me was an examination of this remarkable woman's attitudes and philosophy of life...
Lillian Boxfish shows an intriguing mixture of bold assertiveness and gracious tact in her interactions with others. Being a groundbreaker in her advertising profession for women, both skills are indispensable as well as the need to balance them...and she develops them to an art. Her overriding philosophy is that civility in everything is paramount...you can express your feelings or thoughts, but it must be done with grace and empathy toward whomever you are communicating with...hey, I want to be like that! As she remembers parts of her life while on her long evening walk, Lillian also touches upon a very difficult period when she was around 55 and came down with deep depression marked by anhedonia: the lack of pleasure or of the capacity to experience it. Her recounts of this time made a deep impact on me...
At first when I was reading Lillian Boxfish Takes a Walk, I thought that the author was an elderly woman who was drawing upon her own experiences. Then when I discovered that Kathleen Rooney is actually very young, I thought she must be a remarkable genius. Well, I still think that to an extent about Ms. Rooney, but it wasn't until I finished reading the book that I found out that her Lillian Boxfish character was based on a real person...so I have to add my accolade that the author is also a great researcher. This story is a big winner in any case, and I urge anyone to get a copy and read it...
Ever since I visited New York City...in particular Mid-and-Lower Manhattan...seven years ago, I have keenly noticed any references to the city in the books I've read, especially those focusing on it. Lillian Boxfish Takes a Walk takes the reader on a walk through Manhattan, going back in time to the 1920s, 30s, 40s...and on up to New Years Eve 1984 as the lead character...85 years old...decides to make an adventurous and reflective trek through town. I enjoyed the geography refresher, although my 2010 Manhattan experience came after later mayors Giuliani and Bloomberg empowered the police and drove out the porno shops...no complaints from me as a pedestrian tourist about that although it appears that minority residents may have been unfairly targeted by the cops in their zeal. But the main attraction of this book to me was an examination of this remarkable woman's attitudes and philosophy of life...
Lillian Boxfish shows an intriguing mixture of bold assertiveness and gracious tact in her interactions with others. Being a groundbreaker in her advertising profession for women, both skills are indispensable as well as the need to balance them...and she develops them to an art. Her overriding philosophy is that civility in everything is paramount...you can express your feelings or thoughts, but it must be done with grace and empathy toward whomever you are communicating with...hey, I want to be like that! As she remembers parts of her life while on her long evening walk, Lillian also touches upon a very difficult period when she was around 55 and came down with deep depression marked by anhedonia: the lack of pleasure or of the capacity to experience it. Her recounts of this time made a deep impact on me...
At first when I was reading Lillian Boxfish Takes a Walk, I thought that the author was an elderly woman who was drawing upon her own experiences. Then when I discovered that Kathleen Rooney is actually very young, I thought she must be a remarkable genius. Well, I still think that to an extent about Ms. Rooney, but it wasn't until I finished reading the book that I found out that her Lillian Boxfish character was based on a real person...so I have to add my accolade that the author is also a great researcher. This story is a big winner in any case, and I urge anyone to get a copy and read it...
7/30 Sermon on Everyday Heroes, Part 5
This past Sunday at The Family Church here in Gainesville, senior pastor Philip Griffin continued the series Everyday Heroes, spotlighting various figures from the Bible and how God worked through them to build his kingdom. This message was about Barnabas, whose story is told in the New Testament of Acts. Philip drew upon four different passages, which you can read in the New International Version via Bible Gateway through the following four links:
ACTS 4:36-37 9:26-28 11:24-26 15:37-41
Barnabas was an early Christian who played an integral role in Paul's ministry. Being filled with the Holy Spirit, his words and actions revealed this influence in his life as he gave freely of his possessions, valued people like Paul and Mark as he vouched for the former to those who still feared him for his past persecution of Christians and worked with the latter after Paul had given up on him. So how one deals with possessions, people, and problems reflects on one's spiritual state, as the pastor pointed out. Philip also emphasized that conflicts can be good, change can be productive, and confrontation can be healthy...but certain principles should be followed: in a confrontation, just keep it between the other and yourself, make it face-to-face, truth must be spoken in love and not anger, and the goal should always be reconciliation and not revenge. As for money and possessions he also noted that they can easily become the biggest God substitutes...i.e. idols...in our lives...
You can view Philip's message about Barnabas on the church's YouTube video website...here is a link to it: [link]. The Family Church meets each Sunday morning at 9:30 and 11. There is the weekly sermon, along with praise music and opportunities for prayer. The folks are friendly and the coffee is free! I wonder what the message will be next time around...
ACTS 4:36-37 9:26-28 11:24-26 15:37-41
Barnabas was an early Christian who played an integral role in Paul's ministry. Being filled with the Holy Spirit, his words and actions revealed this influence in his life as he gave freely of his possessions, valued people like Paul and Mark as he vouched for the former to those who still feared him for his past persecution of Christians and worked with the latter after Paul had given up on him. So how one deals with possessions, people, and problems reflects on one's spiritual state, as the pastor pointed out. Philip also emphasized that conflicts can be good, change can be productive, and confrontation can be healthy...but certain principles should be followed: in a confrontation, just keep it between the other and yourself, make it face-to-face, truth must be spoken in love and not anger, and the goal should always be reconciliation and not revenge. As for money and possessions he also noted that they can easily become the biggest God substitutes...i.e. idols...in our lives...
You can view Philip's message about Barnabas on the church's YouTube video website...here is a link to it: [link]. The Family Church meets each Sunday morning at 9:30 and 11. There is the weekly sermon, along with praise music and opportunities for prayer. The folks are friendly and the coffee is free! I wonder what the message will be next time around...
Wednesday, August 2, 2017
Weekly Short Story: The Red-Headed League by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
For many years I have been an ardent fan of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's famed Sherlock Holmes mystery stories. At first I began by watching all of the Basil Rathbone/Nigel Bruce movies, made in the 1930s and 40s...they often diverged widely from the stories, especially those World War II movies where they're riding around in cars and protecting a scientist who designed a bombsight for a bomber plane: Doyle's stories were set in the late nineteenth century! But the flicks did capture the spirit of super-sleuth Holmes even if they did portray his sidekick Dr. Watson as a bit of a silly stumblebum. Since then I've read all of the Sherlock Holmes novels and short stories and quickly downloaded them onto my Kindle after discovering that they were free, being in the public domain. Of course, you can read any of them from a variety of sources on the Internet, including the story I'm discussing today: The Red-Headed League, from the collection The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes...
In The Red-Headed League, Holmes has a new client: Jabez Wilson, a red-headed pawnbroker who has answered an ad in the paper. It seems that a wealthy-but-eccentric red-headed gentleman has passed on and willed that an organization...hence the title of this story...be set up as a benefactor to those who, like him, have red hair. A good-paying part-time job is available and Mr. Wilson seeks it along with many others in town of his hue...he gets hired and goes off to work, handing off his business during those hours to his newly-hired assistant. The "work" consists of sitting in a room for four hours and copying the Encyclopedia Britannica by hand, with the stipulation that he cannot for any reason leave the room until those four hours are up. An easy, but very strange job indeed. He continues doing this for weeks until one day he reports to work and discovers that the room is locked and a notice attached: the Red-Headed League is dissolved!
Holmes and Watson set off to investigate, and of course the wily detective figures it all out, knowing just the right questions to ask. And that's really what it's all about: learning how to ask the right questions...questions the answers for which will lead to ultimate enlightenment. So now I'd like to pose something more general: are we asking the right questions to ourselves and others in our own lives? In order to do this, though, we need to know, like Sherlock Holmes, what our goals are in the end...and I'm afraid that too many of us haven't a "clue"...
It was refreshing to reread one of the good old Sherlock Holmes stories...I'll have to do it again soon...
In The Red-Headed League, Holmes has a new client: Jabez Wilson, a red-headed pawnbroker who has answered an ad in the paper. It seems that a wealthy-but-eccentric red-headed gentleman has passed on and willed that an organization...hence the title of this story...be set up as a benefactor to those who, like him, have red hair. A good-paying part-time job is available and Mr. Wilson seeks it along with many others in town of his hue...he gets hired and goes off to work, handing off his business during those hours to his newly-hired assistant. The "work" consists of sitting in a room for four hours and copying the Encyclopedia Britannica by hand, with the stipulation that he cannot for any reason leave the room until those four hours are up. An easy, but very strange job indeed. He continues doing this for weeks until one day he reports to work and discovers that the room is locked and a notice attached: the Red-Headed League is dissolved!
Holmes and Watson set off to investigate, and of course the wily detective figures it all out, knowing just the right questions to ask. And that's really what it's all about: learning how to ask the right questions...questions the answers for which will lead to ultimate enlightenment. So now I'd like to pose something more general: are we asking the right questions to ourselves and others in our own lives? In order to do this, though, we need to know, like Sherlock Holmes, what our goals are in the end...and I'm afraid that too many of us haven't a "clue"...
It was refreshing to reread one of the good old Sherlock Holmes stories...I'll have to do it again soon...
Tuesday, August 1, 2017
Tuesday's List: The 88 Celestial Constellations...from North to South
Constellations are artificial divisions in the celestial sky, originally designed to connect stars that roughly reveal patterns corresponding to mythology, animals, instruments, and other objects. The Chinese have a completely different system corresponding to their own traditions, but I grew up with the Western version, composed of 88 constellations. Since I have lived mostly in the latitude range from 26 to 30 degrees North, there are certain constellations...called "circumpolar"...that for me have always been above the northern horizon, neither rising nor setting. On the other end of the sky, there are also those constellations in the far south that are always hidden from my view. starting around number 65 (except for #78 Carina...its first magnitude star Canopus is on its far north side): to see them I need to travel south...to see the south celestial pole I would need to go south of the Equator...
You can access interactive star maps from a variety of sources on the Internet: here's a link to one of them: [link]. On the list below, zodiac constellations are italicized while those with first magnitude stars (the brightest) are in bold print, with those stars listed following the entry. I could have arranged the constellations by their right ascensions, which corresponds to Earth's longitude system, and which would give a better idea of what you would see walking out and looking up at any particular time or season...maybe I'll work on that one sometime in the future. Anyway, here's that list, from north to south:
1 Ursa Minor
2 Cepheus
3 Camelopardalis
4 Draco
5 Cassiopeia
6 Ursa Major (including "Big Dipper")
7 Lynx
8 Lacerta
9 Perseus
10 Cygnus...Deneb
11 Auriga...Capella
12 Canes Venatici
13 Andromeda
14 Lyra...Vega
15 Corona Borealis
16 Leo Minor
17 Triangulum
18 Boötes...Arcturus
19 Hercules
20 Vulpecula
21 Coma Berenices
22 Gemini...Pollux
23 Aries
24 Cancer
25 Pegasus
26 Sagitta
27 Taurus...Aldeberan
28 Pisces
29 Leo...Regulus
30 Delphinus
31 Equuleus
32 Canis Minor
33 Serpens
34 Orion...Rigel, Betelgeuse
35 Aquila...Altair
36 Monoceros
37 Sextans
38 Virgo...Spica
39 Cetus
40 Ophiuchus
41 Scutum
42 Aquarius
43 Hydra
44 Libra
45 Crater
46 Capricornus
47 Corvus
48 Lepus
49 Canis Major...Sirius
50 Scorpius...Antares
51 Pyxis
52 Sagittarius
53 Eridanus
54 Piscis Austrinus...Fomalhaut
55 Puppis
56 Fornax
57 Sculptor
58 Antlia
59 Columba
60 Microscopium
61 Caelum
62 Corona Australis
63 Lupus
64 Grus
65 Vela
66 Centaurus...Alpha Centauri, Beta Centauri (Hadar)
67 Phoenix
68 Telescopium
69 Norma
70 Horologium
71 Pictor
72 Ara
73 Dorado
74 Indus
75 Reticulum
76 Crux...Acrux, Mimosa
77 Circinus
78 Carina...Canopus
79 Triangulum Australe
80 Pavo
81 Tucana
82 Volans
83 Hydrus
84 Musca
85 Apus
86 Mensa
87 Chamaeleon
88 Octans
You can access interactive star maps from a variety of sources on the Internet: here's a link to one of them: [link]. On the list below, zodiac constellations are italicized while those with first magnitude stars (the brightest) are in bold print, with those stars listed following the entry. I could have arranged the constellations by their right ascensions, which corresponds to Earth's longitude system, and which would give a better idea of what you would see walking out and looking up at any particular time or season...maybe I'll work on that one sometime in the future. Anyway, here's that list, from north to south:
1 Ursa Minor
2 Cepheus
3 Camelopardalis
4 Draco
5 Cassiopeia
6 Ursa Major (including "Big Dipper")
7 Lynx
8 Lacerta
9 Perseus
10 Cygnus...Deneb
11 Auriga...Capella
12 Canes Venatici
13 Andromeda
14 Lyra...Vega
15 Corona Borealis
16 Leo Minor
17 Triangulum
18 Boötes...Arcturus
19 Hercules
20 Vulpecula
21 Coma Berenices
22 Gemini...Pollux
23 Aries
24 Cancer
25 Pegasus
26 Sagitta
27 Taurus...Aldeberan
28 Pisces
29 Leo...Regulus
30 Delphinus
31 Equuleus
32 Canis Minor
33 Serpens
34 Orion...Rigel, Betelgeuse
35 Aquila...Altair
36 Monoceros
37 Sextans
38 Virgo...Spica
39 Cetus
40 Ophiuchus
41 Scutum
42 Aquarius
43 Hydra
44 Libra
45 Crater
46 Capricornus
47 Corvus
48 Lepus
49 Canis Major...Sirius
50 Scorpius...Antares
51 Pyxis
52 Sagittarius
53 Eridanus
54 Piscis Austrinus...Fomalhaut
55 Puppis
56 Fornax
57 Sculptor
58 Antlia
59 Columba
60 Microscopium
61 Caelum
62 Corona Australis
63 Lupus
64 Grus
65 Vela
66 Centaurus...Alpha Centauri, Beta Centauri (Hadar)
67 Phoenix
68 Telescopium
69 Norma
70 Horologium
71 Pictor
72 Ara
73 Dorado
74 Indus
75 Reticulum
76 Crux...Acrux, Mimosa
77 Circinus
78 Carina...Canopus
79 Triangulum Australe
80 Pavo
81 Tucana
82 Volans
83 Hydrus
84 Musca
85 Apus
86 Mensa
87 Chamaeleon
88 Octans
Monday, July 31, 2017
My July 2017 Running Report
Although I managed to run some each day of July...with several days experiencing multiple runs...my total mileage continues to be relatively low. This month I run for a total of 90 miles, with a couple of 2.7 mile-runs being my longest single runs...not enough by my standards. I haven't been as motivated lately with my running as in the past, and the weather for the last two months has been very, very hot and muggy...with too many frequent rainstorms. I thought of switching to running in the rain, at least during the summertime...but unfortunately where I live that rain is almost always accompanied by thunder and lightning...
So where do I go from here? I'm thinking of just ditching any notions in the near future of road running and instead make daily visits to my local gym, which is usually open 24/7 and always has accessible treadmills. I do need to start stepping up my mileage and build my endurance back up if I want to participate in any 10K or half-marathon races this coming fall and winter...
So where do I go from here? I'm thinking of just ditching any notions in the near future of road running and instead make daily visits to my local gym, which is usually open 24/7 and always has accessible treadmills. I do need to start stepping up my mileage and build my endurance back up if I want to participate in any 10K or half-marathon races this coming fall and winter...
Sunday, July 30, 2017
A Little Political Talk
It's funny how I will lose contact with someone, such as a classmate or former coworker, over the span of years, and then hear from them again...only to find that they have become very emotionally committed to partisan politics, either on the left or the right. The motives for their alignment may be some issues important to them or the relative philosophies and priorities of conservatives and liberals, but their outward expression tends to be highly personal, with politicians and media figures on "their" side depicted as noble, principled, pro-freedom heroes and those on the "other" side as villainous, dictatorial, dishonest, corrupt, and stupid. Since the 2016 presidential election this personalization of politics has greatly intensified due to the controversial winner, who attacked the personalities and integrity of opponents within his own party during the primary season, made hateful remarks about various media figures critical of him, and then called his general election opponent "evil" and "the devil". And later, after taking office, he had the nerve to bemoan that there was so such hatred! Given these theatrics, it is understandable that many of us are more inclined to see politics through personalities rather than issues...but reality dictates that we live in the present and are much more likely to be affected by how our elected politicians...whether we like them or not...are making decisions on those issues that affect us a lot more than any impulsive tweets or stump speech assertions. I've said it before: I personally disliked both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton during last year's campaign, but one of them was going to be elected president. Now it's a little more than half a year into Trump's term and I like him less than ever...but he is my president and, looking at some of the issues he is facing, I find myself supporting him on some and opposing him on others...
I believe that it is a Constitutional mandate for the president to protect the people of the United States against dangers from abroad. The ideas of securing our borders and being more careful about admitting others into our country are good, prudent ones...unfortunately, Trump's implementation of these worthy goals have been marked by a lack of preparation and careless speech overgeneralizing different ethnic and religious groups, too much of it aimed at a political base containing many xenophobes. But the aims are necessary...
Donald Trump wants to wipe out ISIS, a.k.a. "Islamic State". But since this terrorist organization has planted itself in several countries and has an Internet-based communication and recruitment network, driving them out of Iraq and Syria won't completely eliminate them. But the people living in Mosul and Raqqa want no part of them and welcome the liberating forces supported by both the present and previous president...a positive continuity of policy. Good!
I tentatively support President Trump's apparently constructive attitude in favor of funding our space program, especially manned space travel, although the pattern over the years has been for each succeeding president to drastically change the goals...causing disruption, delay, and wasted efforts and money. The best outcome would be for him to continue the project to go to Mars and to eventually restore George W. Bush's plan to establish a permanent base on the moon...
Well, that's three issues; there are some others that I have mixed feelings about such as energy, infrastructure, and health care...maybe I'll go into them at another date. And then, on the negative side, there's Trump's desire to squelch criticism of himself and his administration, his conflicts of interest, and the ongoing Russian investigation. Can I trust this man when dealing with this complicated relationship between America and Putin's Russia?
I don't know what the future will bring, but I know one thing right now, in late July of 2017: for this season in our country's history Donald Trump is the president...and Republicans have majorities in both houses of Congress as well as most state governorships and their legislatures. They will do some good things...and some not-so-good things. Let's focus more on the issues at hand and less on the often melodramatic personalities...although the biggest drama queen of them all seems to think the world itself is one big reality TV series, with himself the (only) star and tweeter-in-chief...
I believe that it is a Constitutional mandate for the president to protect the people of the United States against dangers from abroad. The ideas of securing our borders and being more careful about admitting others into our country are good, prudent ones...unfortunately, Trump's implementation of these worthy goals have been marked by a lack of preparation and careless speech overgeneralizing different ethnic and religious groups, too much of it aimed at a political base containing many xenophobes. But the aims are necessary...
Donald Trump wants to wipe out ISIS, a.k.a. "Islamic State". But since this terrorist organization has planted itself in several countries and has an Internet-based communication and recruitment network, driving them out of Iraq and Syria won't completely eliminate them. But the people living in Mosul and Raqqa want no part of them and welcome the liberating forces supported by both the present and previous president...a positive continuity of policy. Good!
I tentatively support President Trump's apparently constructive attitude in favor of funding our space program, especially manned space travel, although the pattern over the years has been for each succeeding president to drastically change the goals...causing disruption, delay, and wasted efforts and money. The best outcome would be for him to continue the project to go to Mars and to eventually restore George W. Bush's plan to establish a permanent base on the moon...
Well, that's three issues; there are some others that I have mixed feelings about such as energy, infrastructure, and health care...maybe I'll go into them at another date. And then, on the negative side, there's Trump's desire to squelch criticism of himself and his administration, his conflicts of interest, and the ongoing Russian investigation. Can I trust this man when dealing with this complicated relationship between America and Putin's Russia?
I don't know what the future will bring, but I know one thing right now, in late July of 2017: for this season in our country's history Donald Trump is the president...and Republicans have majorities in both houses of Congress as well as most state governorships and their legislatures. They will do some good things...and some not-so-good things. Let's focus more on the issues at hand and less on the often melodramatic personalities...although the biggest drama queen of them all seems to think the world itself is one big reality TV series, with himself the (only) star and tweeter-in-chief...
Saturday, July 29, 2017
Just Finished Reading Gravity's Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon
A few years ago a couple of professional critics from Time Magazine compiled a list of what they thought were the 100 greatest American novels since 1923, the beginning year of that publication...here's a link to that list: [link]. One of their selections was Gravity's Rainbow, written by Thomas Pynchon and published in 1973. I just finished reading it...or should I say, trying hard to read it...and just completed the arduous and frustrating task...
The general setting of Gravity's Rainbow is Europe in 1944-45 during the final months of World War II and the first few immediately thereafter. Germany has been launching V-2 rockets at England and is causing terrible civilian damage and casualties. British intelligence, composed of numerous organizations as engaged in infighting as they are against the enemy, has made a startling discovery: an American private's personal map boasting of the locations of his many different sexual encounters around London corresponds precisely to that of the V-2 landings. What could possibly be the connection between the two? This character, Tyrone Slothrop, is sent to the French Riviera on a mission and then escapes and wanders across Europe, gradually losing his own personality and being...which is implied to depend in large part on how others see him. In the meantime, a new rocket is being developed and various parties are vying to get it before it is launched. But with this general...extremely general...plot structure, don't get any ideas that it will help you to understand what's going on in Gravity's Rainbow the overwhelming majority of time...
Pynchon is described as a postmodernist writer, and if that means abruptly switching settings and hundreds of characters, transitioning from reality to dreams, present to past times...all without any hint of warning...then I must not be a very good postmodern reader, for I feel that any affectations of writing that seem to go out of their way to interfere with my comprehension are just that: affectations. Don't get me wrong: any particular "pocket" of narrative can be easily read and understood. It's just that very little of it connects, i.e. very little flow here, either in terms of character development, plot, or tone...
I'll let others with more substantial academic credentials go on about the philosophical and psychological issues Thomas Pynchon raised in Gravity's Rainbow...let me just put forth one little observation. The author seems to be of the school of thought that, unlike the traditional view of history as made of great figures and events, history instead arises from the "bottom-up" as the total effect of the actions of ordinary individuals. In World War II, society was ostensibly very centralized and controlled through power hierarchies, but I perceived that Pynchon was saying that everyone instead was pretty much on their own, following their own particular agendas while superficially retaining the trappings of that external, structured society. Well, at least that's what I got out of this wearisome, confusing book. Gravity's Rainbow is definitely not on my "Top 100" list and I don't recommend it, but should you decide to "take the plunge" and read it, I welcome your reactions...
The general setting of Gravity's Rainbow is Europe in 1944-45 during the final months of World War II and the first few immediately thereafter. Germany has been launching V-2 rockets at England and is causing terrible civilian damage and casualties. British intelligence, composed of numerous organizations as engaged in infighting as they are against the enemy, has made a startling discovery: an American private's personal map boasting of the locations of his many different sexual encounters around London corresponds precisely to that of the V-2 landings. What could possibly be the connection between the two? This character, Tyrone Slothrop, is sent to the French Riviera on a mission and then escapes and wanders across Europe, gradually losing his own personality and being...which is implied to depend in large part on how others see him. In the meantime, a new rocket is being developed and various parties are vying to get it before it is launched. But with this general...extremely general...plot structure, don't get any ideas that it will help you to understand what's going on in Gravity's Rainbow the overwhelming majority of time...
Pynchon is described as a postmodernist writer, and if that means abruptly switching settings and hundreds of characters, transitioning from reality to dreams, present to past times...all without any hint of warning...then I must not be a very good postmodern reader, for I feel that any affectations of writing that seem to go out of their way to interfere with my comprehension are just that: affectations. Don't get me wrong: any particular "pocket" of narrative can be easily read and understood. It's just that very little of it connects, i.e. very little flow here, either in terms of character development, plot, or tone...
I'll let others with more substantial academic credentials go on about the philosophical and psychological issues Thomas Pynchon raised in Gravity's Rainbow...let me just put forth one little observation. The author seems to be of the school of thought that, unlike the traditional view of history as made of great figures and events, history instead arises from the "bottom-up" as the total effect of the actions of ordinary individuals. In World War II, society was ostensibly very centralized and controlled through power hierarchies, but I perceived that Pynchon was saying that everyone instead was pretty much on their own, following their own particular agendas while superficially retaining the trappings of that external, structured society. Well, at least that's what I got out of this wearisome, confusing book. Gravity's Rainbow is definitely not on my "Top 100" list and I don't recommend it, but should you decide to "take the plunge" and read it, I welcome your reactions...
Friday, July 28, 2017
Quote of the Week...from Abraham Lincoln
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
---Abraham Lincoln.
Our sixteenth president produced a lot of sagacious and humorous one-liners like the above...I could have picked from several others as well. But I picked this one because it has an almost universal application...although in this article I think it's prudent to just refer to myself...
Being someone who generally keeps to myself, many around me might think that I am reserved and careful about what I say when I do getting around to speaking. But that's not what ol' Abe was talking about with his quote: one can be gregarious and loquacious and still practice wisdom regarding their choices of both timing and words when it comes to speaking with others. As a matter of fact, the more practice, the better I imagine people would be at determining what works and what doesn't...so just because I don't usually speak a lot doesn't mean that I'm not liable to say something extraordinarily foolish when I do finally get around to opening up my mouth...
The art of civility, which the main character in a novel I'm currently reading has made a priority of practicing, involves a sometimes difficult balancing act, with the necessity at times to be openly assertive and frank on one side and the potentially negative consequences of doing this on the other. Lincoln was in essence saying that, if you can't clearly conclude that speaking out on something is necessary and productive, then better to "remain silent and thought a fool" than to make things worse with your words. I think most folks agree with this, although they...myself included...often do the opposite, unfortunately...
---Abraham Lincoln.
Our sixteenth president produced a lot of sagacious and humorous one-liners like the above...I could have picked from several others as well. But I picked this one because it has an almost universal application...although in this article I think it's prudent to just refer to myself...
Being someone who generally keeps to myself, many around me might think that I am reserved and careful about what I say when I do getting around to speaking. But that's not what ol' Abe was talking about with his quote: one can be gregarious and loquacious and still practice wisdom regarding their choices of both timing and words when it comes to speaking with others. As a matter of fact, the more practice, the better I imagine people would be at determining what works and what doesn't...so just because I don't usually speak a lot doesn't mean that I'm not liable to say something extraordinarily foolish when I do finally get around to opening up my mouth...
The art of civility, which the main character in a novel I'm currently reading has made a priority of practicing, involves a sometimes difficult balancing act, with the necessity at times to be openly assertive and frank on one side and the potentially negative consequences of doing this on the other. Lincoln was in essence saying that, if you can't clearly conclude that speaking out on something is necessary and productive, then better to "remain silent and thought a fool" than to make things worse with your words. I think most folks agree with this, although they...myself included...often do the opposite, unfortunately...
Thursday, July 27, 2017
Sermon on Everyday Heroes, Pt. 4
At The Family Church here in Gainesville, senior pastor Philip Griffin continued the series Everyday Heroes by talking about the pivotal New Testament figure of Paul. In doing so, he emphasized the crucial role that grace played in Paul's life and ministry...and should play in ours. The text of focus was 1 Timothy 1:12-16, which you can read in the New International Version via the Bible Gateway website: [link]...
God's grace to Paul...and accordingly, to us as well...was the theme to Philip's message. And how does this grace work? First, it pursues us while we are still separated from God. Then, we are saved by grace...by faith, as the pastor stressed, since we cannot earn it by ourselves, but rather only by the one who earned it for us. Once saved, grace defines us...as opposed to hubris (arrogant pride)...as we carry on God's grace from us to others. And finally Philip (and Paul) pointed out that grace calls us into service...which in turn goes back to God working through his grace to pursue us...
When exercising grace, I'm doing things differently that the good-for-good, evil-for-evil system of interactive behavior that permeates this world of ours. It matters not whether I feel wronged by another or that I did something to deserve whatever ill treatment I think I've received...the "grace reaction" covers it all. Grace is a kind of "paying forward" whereby goodwill, forgiveness, and love serve as testimonies to God's presence in our hearts. There's no doubt about it: we all could use more grace in our lives, both in terms of receiving it and giving it to others. And the source of it all is God, through Jesus Christ...
The Family Church Sunday morning sermons can be watched on their YouTube video site, which you can get to with this link: [link]. The Sunday services are at 9:30 and 11 and feature the weekly message as well as great praise music, opportunities for discipleship and learning, friendly folks...and some terrific coffee...
God's grace to Paul...and accordingly, to us as well...was the theme to Philip's message. And how does this grace work? First, it pursues us while we are still separated from God. Then, we are saved by grace...by faith, as the pastor stressed, since we cannot earn it by ourselves, but rather only by the one who earned it for us. Once saved, grace defines us...as opposed to hubris (arrogant pride)...as we carry on God's grace from us to others. And finally Philip (and Paul) pointed out that grace calls us into service...which in turn goes back to God working through his grace to pursue us...
When exercising grace, I'm doing things differently that the good-for-good, evil-for-evil system of interactive behavior that permeates this world of ours. It matters not whether I feel wronged by another or that I did something to deserve whatever ill treatment I think I've received...the "grace reaction" covers it all. Grace is a kind of "paying forward" whereby goodwill, forgiveness, and love serve as testimonies to God's presence in our hearts. There's no doubt about it: we all could use more grace in our lives, both in terms of receiving it and giving it to others. And the source of it all is God, through Jesus Christ...
The Family Church Sunday morning sermons can be watched on their YouTube video site, which you can get to with this link: [link]. The Sunday services are at 9:30 and 11 and feature the weekly message as well as great praise music, opportunities for discipleship and learning, friendly folks...and some terrific coffee...
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
Weekly Short Story: Mimic by Donald A. Wollheim
Sometimes short stories can be memorable even though they barely take up any space, while others...equally impactful...can resemble short novels in their length. One of my favorite science fiction anthologies is Isaac Asimov Presents the Great SF Stories 4 (1942), DAW Books, 1980. It goes back to 75 years ago with some of the best short fiction of that year, and I plan to review both long and short pieces from it. This week I'm focusing on the six-page-long tale Mimic, by Donald A. Wollheim...who incidentally was the publisher of this series...
In biology, mimicry occurs whenever a species of life evolves to imitate the form, appearance, and/or motion of another...usually with the resulting benefit of escaping being eaten...or enabling it to eat others. In Mimic, the unnamed narrator, employed as a museum curator's assistant, explains this fascinating aspect to biology very cogently...and then leads into the story. There is a heavily cloaked man in black living in the heart of New York City. He has lived there for years upon end, never talks to anyone, keeps to himself...and has an inordinate fear of women. As far as anyone can see, he bothers no one, and people have pretty much become accustomed to his strangeness. But the title of this story is "Mimic", and it's pretty clear that it relates in a major way to this character. It is the unexpected twist at the end...common with these very brief stories...that gives it a much greater impact...
Although Wollheim was referring to mimicry as a product of natural selection enabling those life forms using it to survive in the wild, there is another type of it used in society. People want to fit in and "survive", be it at school, work, or other social environments...but in order to avoid standing out and being subjected to rejection, many choose the tactic of "winging it"...acting as if they are as competent and integral members of their group as they think they should be to attain acceptance. Yes, we humans have our own version of mimicry...
And now you can read Mimic for yourself...the copyright must have expired, for it is readily available on the Net: here is a link to it on the UNZ.org site: [link]...
In biology, mimicry occurs whenever a species of life evolves to imitate the form, appearance, and/or motion of another...usually with the resulting benefit of escaping being eaten...or enabling it to eat others. In Mimic, the unnamed narrator, employed as a museum curator's assistant, explains this fascinating aspect to biology very cogently...and then leads into the story. There is a heavily cloaked man in black living in the heart of New York City. He has lived there for years upon end, never talks to anyone, keeps to himself...and has an inordinate fear of women. As far as anyone can see, he bothers no one, and people have pretty much become accustomed to his strangeness. But the title of this story is "Mimic", and it's pretty clear that it relates in a major way to this character. It is the unexpected twist at the end...common with these very brief stories...that gives it a much greater impact...
Although Wollheim was referring to mimicry as a product of natural selection enabling those life forms using it to survive in the wild, there is another type of it used in society. People want to fit in and "survive", be it at school, work, or other social environments...but in order to avoid standing out and being subjected to rejection, many choose the tactic of "winging it"...acting as if they are as competent and integral members of their group as they think they should be to attain acceptance. Yes, we humans have our own version of mimicry...
And now you can read Mimic for yourself...the copyright must have expired, for it is readily available on the Net: here is a link to it on the UNZ.org site: [link]...
Tuesday, July 25, 2017
Tuesday's List: My Top 50 Favorite Songs from The Who
Back in 1965 one day I was listening to Miami's WQAM, the popular local rock music radio station. They were playing a new song, which I automatically thought was the Beatles. I instantly liked I Can't Explain...but it wasn't the Fab Four, it was a new band called The Who. This very talented group for some reason wasn't able to make as big an impression as other British acts in the U.S. during the sixties other than a few hit singles, but after their rock opera Tommy came out in 1969 they became more known as an album rock band. During the early 1990s I stepped into Hyde and Zeke Records, a used record store across from the University of Florida on West University Avenue, and found The Who's first four studio albums released in the United States... I bought them all at a steal. It soon became very clear that this group, with Roger Daltrey as lead singer, Peter Townshend as lead guitarist/singer/songwriter, John Entwistle on bass guitar, and Keith Moon on drums, was much more talented than I had earlier known...these early songs were great! Over the course of the years I listened to all of their studio albums...with the exception of their last one which was released some 25 years after the previous. Moon and Entwistle have passed on, but Townshend and Daltrey still perform together from time to time. The following is the list of my top favorite 50 songs of theirs. Each song is listed in capitals with the album and year of release following...
1 THE GOOD'S GONE.......My Generation (1965)
2 MAGIC BUS....................Magic Bus: The Who on Tour (1968)
3 DOCTOR JIMMY...........Quadrophenia (1973)
4 I CAN'T EXPLAIN.........Single (1965)
5 RAEL..............................The Who Sell Out (1967)
6 HAPPY JACK.................A Quick One (1966)
7 MY WIFE.......................Who's Next (1971)
8 I CAN'T REACH YOU.........The Who Sell Out (1967)
9 BABA O'RILEY............Who's Next (1971)
10 INSTANT PARTY.............My Generation (1965)
11 5:15..............................Quadrophenia (1973)
12 RUN RUN RUN..........A Quick One (1966)
13 TOMMY CAN YOU HEAR ME........Tommy (1969)
14 BELL BOY..................Quadrophenia (1973)
15 SQUEEZE BOX..........The Who By Numbers (1975)
16 SUNRISE.....................The Who Sell Out (1967)
17 CALL ME LIGHTNING......Magic Bus: The Who on Tour (1968)
18 UNDERTURE.............Tommy (1969)
19 BLUE, RED, AND GREY.........The Who By Numbers (1975)
20 GUITAR AND PEN..........Who Are You (1978)
21 A LEGAL MATTER.........My Generation (1965)
22 RELAX.....................The Who Sell Out (1967)
23 I'M FREE..................Tommy (1969)
24 YOU BETTER YOU BET.......Face Dances (1981)
25 QUADROPHENIA........Quadrophenia (1973)
26 THE KIDS ARE ALRIGHT.....My Generation (1965)
27 EMINENCE FRONT.......It's Hard (1982)
28 SEE MY WAY...........A Quick One (1966)
29 GOING MOBILE........Who's Next (1971)
30 WHISKEY MAN........A Quick One (1966)
31 DISGUISES................Magic Bus: The Who on Tour (1968)
32 OVERTURE..............Tommy (1969)
33 ATHENA...................It's Hard (1982)
34 MY GENERATION.........My Generation (1965)
35 PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE........My Generation (1965)
36 WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT........Tommy (1969)
37 THE REAL ME.........Quadrophenia (1973)
38 ANYWAY ANYHOW ANYWHERE......Single (1965)
39 ARMENIA CITY IN THE SKY........The Who Sell Out (1967)
40 SEE ME FEEL ME........Tommy (1969)
41 THEY ARE ALL IN LOVE......The Who By Numbers (1975)
42 LOVE REIGN O'ER ME.......Quadrophenia (1973)
43 GETTING IN TUNE........Who's Next (1971)
44 I CAN SEE FOR MILES......The Who Sell Out (1967)
45 BARGAIN.................Who's Next (1971)
46 THE OX....................My Generation (1965)
47 THE ROCK...............Quadrophenia (1973)
48 WHO ARE YOU............Who Are You (1978)
49 WON'T GET FOOLED AGAIN......Who's Next (1971)
50 OUR LOVE WAS, IS......The Who Sell Out (1967)
1 THE GOOD'S GONE.......My Generation (1965)
2 MAGIC BUS....................Magic Bus: The Who on Tour (1968)
3 DOCTOR JIMMY...........Quadrophenia (1973)
4 I CAN'T EXPLAIN.........Single (1965)
5 RAEL..............................The Who Sell Out (1967)
6 HAPPY JACK.................A Quick One (1966)
7 MY WIFE.......................Who's Next (1971)
8 I CAN'T REACH YOU.........The Who Sell Out (1967)
9 BABA O'RILEY............Who's Next (1971)
10 INSTANT PARTY.............My Generation (1965)
11 5:15..............................Quadrophenia (1973)
12 RUN RUN RUN..........A Quick One (1966)
13 TOMMY CAN YOU HEAR ME........Tommy (1969)
14 BELL BOY..................Quadrophenia (1973)
15 SQUEEZE BOX..........The Who By Numbers (1975)
16 SUNRISE.....................The Who Sell Out (1967)
17 CALL ME LIGHTNING......Magic Bus: The Who on Tour (1968)
18 UNDERTURE.............Tommy (1969)
19 BLUE, RED, AND GREY.........The Who By Numbers (1975)
20 GUITAR AND PEN..........Who Are You (1978)
21 A LEGAL MATTER.........My Generation (1965)
22 RELAX.....................The Who Sell Out (1967)
23 I'M FREE..................Tommy (1969)
24 YOU BETTER YOU BET.......Face Dances (1981)
25 QUADROPHENIA........Quadrophenia (1973)
26 THE KIDS ARE ALRIGHT.....My Generation (1965)
27 EMINENCE FRONT.......It's Hard (1982)
28 SEE MY WAY...........A Quick One (1966)
29 GOING MOBILE........Who's Next (1971)
30 WHISKEY MAN........A Quick One (1966)
31 DISGUISES................Magic Bus: The Who on Tour (1968)
32 OVERTURE..............Tommy (1969)
33 ATHENA...................It's Hard (1982)
34 MY GENERATION.........My Generation (1965)
35 PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE........My Generation (1965)
36 WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT........Tommy (1969)
37 THE REAL ME.........Quadrophenia (1973)
38 ANYWAY ANYHOW ANYWHERE......Single (1965)
39 ARMENIA CITY IN THE SKY........The Who Sell Out (1967)
40 SEE ME FEEL ME........Tommy (1969)
41 THEY ARE ALL IN LOVE......The Who By Numbers (1975)
42 LOVE REIGN O'ER ME.......Quadrophenia (1973)
43 GETTING IN TUNE........Who's Next (1971)
44 I CAN SEE FOR MILES......The Who Sell Out (1967)
45 BARGAIN.................Who's Next (1971)
46 THE OX....................My Generation (1965)
47 THE ROCK...............Quadrophenia (1973)
48 WHO ARE YOU............Who Are You (1978)
49 WON'T GET FOOLED AGAIN......Who's Next (1971)
50 OUR LOVE WAS, IS......The Who Sell Out (1967)
Monday, July 24, 2017
President Emphasizes Loyalty...But It's Only One-Way
I am an avid fan of the first two Godfather movies...you can have Godfather, Part 3 for all it's worth. In them is the passing on of an organized crime family's power from father Vito Corleone to his son Michael. Both men place great importance on the personal loyalty of their people to them...but Vito is the only one of the two who values returning that loyalty shown him. Michael has learned on a superficial level to talk like his father, but throughout his "reign" he has a nasty habit of throwing his loyal followers under the bus whenever expedience dictates it. Loyalty to father is rewarded with security and favors, while loyalty to son is punished with danger or even death. I bring up this movie series because this country of ours has as president someone who makes a very big deal about personal loyalty from those working for him. How does he return it: like Vito or like Michael? Events seem to indicate the latter...
Michael Flynn, Jeff Sessions, and Sean Spicer have all demonstrated a tremendous level of loyalty to Donald Trump, yet he has shown virtually none to them. He was strangely very quick in getting rid of Flynn as his national security advisor, humiliated Spicer by shunning him on trips and drastically cutting back his press briefings while hiring someone as communications director that he knew Spicer was opposed to, and is now on a very public, continual Twitter rant against Attorney General Sessions. And now he's taking swipes at the Republicans in the Senate, who have bent over backwards trying to accommodate him with his legislative agenda. The question I have to ask is that once you see this pattern of betrayal by someone like Donald Trump...or Michael Corleone...why would you still idolize them as great leaders and continue to display slavish loyalty to them and make excuses for everything they say and do...even if you happen to agree with their agenda? It isn't a conservative vs. liberal binary-type question...there are plenty of great conservative leaders to follow instead who wouldn't behave in this manner...
Michael Flynn, Jeff Sessions, and Sean Spicer have all demonstrated a tremendous level of loyalty to Donald Trump, yet he has shown virtually none to them. He was strangely very quick in getting rid of Flynn as his national security advisor, humiliated Spicer by shunning him on trips and drastically cutting back his press briefings while hiring someone as communications director that he knew Spicer was opposed to, and is now on a very public, continual Twitter rant against Attorney General Sessions. And now he's taking swipes at the Republicans in the Senate, who have bent over backwards trying to accommodate him with his legislative agenda. The question I have to ask is that once you see this pattern of betrayal by someone like Donald Trump...or Michael Corleone...why would you still idolize them as great leaders and continue to display slavish loyalty to them and make excuses for everything they say and do...even if you happen to agree with their agenda? It isn't a conservative vs. liberal binary-type question...there are plenty of great conservative leaders to follow instead who wouldn't behave in this manner...
Sunday, July 23, 2017
The Union's Civil War Victory: Strategically Inevitable, Politically Precarious
I was watching a couple of history specials this afternoon on PBS about the American Civil War. The first was an episode of Ken Burns' documentary series and the second was about the Battle of Gettysburg. After watching both programs, I came away with the feeling that there are two camps of thought about the inevitability of the Union victory over the Confederacy...
One group of folks seem to be of the opinion...like my old college American History professor...that the North had too many advantages over the South, with its greater population, industrial economy, and control over the high seas. Their strategy over the course of the war was to blockade the Confederacy by sea and then carve it up by taking control of the Mississippi River throughout its course, bisect the South by cutting through Georgia to the seas, and starving out Robert E. Lee's Virginia army. And as far as I can see it, they have some very good points...the Rebels were definitely suffering from severe shortages and broken communication and transportation lines by 1864. And as long as the conflict remained on southern land, those living in the north did not feel physically threatened by the conflict reaching their towns and farms. But the analysts holding the view that a Union victory was a slam-dunk from the start fail to take into consideration the political angle to the war and how close...from the Battle of Gettysburg in July of 1863 to the conquest of Atlanta in July, 1864...the northern population came to turning against Lincoln and rejecting his presidency in the 1864 presidential election in favor of peace candidate George McClellan. Had Longstreet's more prudent strategy prevailed over his superior Lee's of massive attack against Union positions around Gettysburg, Pennsylvania on the third day of battle or had the Confederates gained the high ground as they came so close to doing on that second day, a Confederate victory on Union territory could well have tipped the political scales against Lincoln: as it was, an invasion into Pennsylvania by Lee's forces was in itself traumatic enough. But although the North was slowly starving out the South through sieges such as at Atlanta and Petersburg (Virginia), the downside was that the war was dragging on, seemingly endless. And the country was weary of it all, with no final victory in sight...
So strategically the South didn't have a chance...but politically they came very close in 1864 to changing the North's political landscape in their favor. Had McClellan won that fateful election, who knows what would have happened. But Sherman was able to take Atlanta (due in part to Confederate president Jefferson Davis and his ill-advised replacement of the competent General Joseph Johnston with the incompetent John Bell Hood) and Lincoln's popularity rebounded on to his reelection that November...
One group of folks seem to be of the opinion...like my old college American History professor...that the North had too many advantages over the South, with its greater population, industrial economy, and control over the high seas. Their strategy over the course of the war was to blockade the Confederacy by sea and then carve it up by taking control of the Mississippi River throughout its course, bisect the South by cutting through Georgia to the seas, and starving out Robert E. Lee's Virginia army. And as far as I can see it, they have some very good points...the Rebels were definitely suffering from severe shortages and broken communication and transportation lines by 1864. And as long as the conflict remained on southern land, those living in the north did not feel physically threatened by the conflict reaching their towns and farms. But the analysts holding the view that a Union victory was a slam-dunk from the start fail to take into consideration the political angle to the war and how close...from the Battle of Gettysburg in July of 1863 to the conquest of Atlanta in July, 1864...the northern population came to turning against Lincoln and rejecting his presidency in the 1864 presidential election in favor of peace candidate George McClellan. Had Longstreet's more prudent strategy prevailed over his superior Lee's of massive attack against Union positions around Gettysburg, Pennsylvania on the third day of battle or had the Confederates gained the high ground as they came so close to doing on that second day, a Confederate victory on Union territory could well have tipped the political scales against Lincoln: as it was, an invasion into Pennsylvania by Lee's forces was in itself traumatic enough. But although the North was slowly starving out the South through sieges such as at Atlanta and Petersburg (Virginia), the downside was that the war was dragging on, seemingly endless. And the country was weary of it all, with no final victory in sight...
So strategically the South didn't have a chance...but politically they came very close in 1864 to changing the North's political landscape in their favor. Had McClellan won that fateful election, who knows what would have happened. But Sherman was able to take Atlanta (due in part to Confederate president Jefferson Davis and his ill-advised replacement of the competent General Joseph Johnston with the incompetent John Bell Hood) and Lincoln's popularity rebounded on to his reelection that November...
Saturday, July 22, 2017
Just Finished Reading Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut
Slaughterhouse-Five, Kurt Vonnegut's 1969 science-fiction/war/historical/semi-autobiographical masterpiece, quickly made its way to high school English classes where it was often an assigned book...but not in any of mine. It was years before I experienced it, albeit not in book form but through the excellent 1972 movie...which I've seen a couple of times. I finally decided to read the book...something I almost never do if I first see the film version...to see how Vonnegut went about spinning this compelling yarn. I wasn't disappointed...
Soon after arriving in Europe in late 1944 as a chaplain's assistant, American private Billy Pilgrim is captured during the German offensive in the Battle of the Bulge. Just before he is taken prisoner, though, he becomes "unstuck in time" and begins to jump back and forth to different parts of his life. Before long he knows not only what happens to many of the people he has (or eventually will) come to know, but also becomes keenly aware exactly how and when he will die. Billy will survive World War II, but not before he is taken with other American POWs to Dresden, Germany and witnesses the annihilation of that supposedly nonmilitary, historic city...along with 137,000 inhabitants...one night by British bombers. He returns home after the war and becomes an optometrist, marrying into a wealthy family and enjoying material success. Tragedies do occur, though, and Billy already knows of them even while still in the war due to his time-jumping. He also knows he will be abducted by a distant alien race called the Tralfamadorians to be a zoo exhibit. It is these entities who educate Billy about the true nature of time, life, and death: everything that ever happened (or will happen) and everyone who ever lived (or ever will live) is in a real sense always happening and living. Because of his own time traveling experiences, Billy understands this and regards mortality in a much different light than do others...remarking upon any reference to death with the words "and so it goes"...
Kurt Vonnegut actually did get captured during the Battle of the Bulge and taken to Dresden, where he survived the devastating raid of that city by virtue of being in a heavily fortified underground room beneath a former slaughterhouse for pigs...hence the name Slaughterhouse Five, or in German, Schlachthof Fünf. In the book he briefly appears as a peripheral character... also included in the story is the fictional novelist Kilgore Trout, who resurfaces in other books of Vonnegut's...
The two main themes as I saw them in Slaughterhouse-Five were the horrors of the Dresden bombing...and war in general...and the nature of time as it relates to life and mortality. Kurt Vonnegut's writing style was clear and very reader-friendly, in spite of the potentially confusing time travels of Billy Pilgrim within his own lifetime. If you're into metaphysics, then this is a must-read. The only thing I regret about this book is not having read it earlier...
Soon after arriving in Europe in late 1944 as a chaplain's assistant, American private Billy Pilgrim is captured during the German offensive in the Battle of the Bulge. Just before he is taken prisoner, though, he becomes "unstuck in time" and begins to jump back and forth to different parts of his life. Before long he knows not only what happens to many of the people he has (or eventually will) come to know, but also becomes keenly aware exactly how and when he will die. Billy will survive World War II, but not before he is taken with other American POWs to Dresden, Germany and witnesses the annihilation of that supposedly nonmilitary, historic city...along with 137,000 inhabitants...one night by British bombers. He returns home after the war and becomes an optometrist, marrying into a wealthy family and enjoying material success. Tragedies do occur, though, and Billy already knows of them even while still in the war due to his time-jumping. He also knows he will be abducted by a distant alien race called the Tralfamadorians to be a zoo exhibit. It is these entities who educate Billy about the true nature of time, life, and death: everything that ever happened (or will happen) and everyone who ever lived (or ever will live) is in a real sense always happening and living. Because of his own time traveling experiences, Billy understands this and regards mortality in a much different light than do others...remarking upon any reference to death with the words "and so it goes"...
Kurt Vonnegut actually did get captured during the Battle of the Bulge and taken to Dresden, where he survived the devastating raid of that city by virtue of being in a heavily fortified underground room beneath a former slaughterhouse for pigs...hence the name Slaughterhouse Five, or in German, Schlachthof Fünf. In the book he briefly appears as a peripheral character... also included in the story is the fictional novelist Kilgore Trout, who resurfaces in other books of Vonnegut's...
The two main themes as I saw them in Slaughterhouse-Five were the horrors of the Dresden bombing...and war in general...and the nature of time as it relates to life and mortality. Kurt Vonnegut's writing style was clear and very reader-friendly, in spite of the potentially confusing time travels of Billy Pilgrim within his own lifetime. If you're into metaphysics, then this is a must-read. The only thing I regret about this book is not having read it earlier...
Friday, July 21, 2017
Quote of the Week...from Ernest Hemingway
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow men. True nobility lies in being superior to your former self. ---Ernest Hemingway
The above quote from Ernest Hemingway, the great twentieth-century American author whose birthday is today, runs contrary to the overly competitive world around us. Nowadays it's all about who's number one, or the best...and if you're not, you'd better get on the ball if you don't want to be replaced. Our schools pit students against each other not only on the athletic field, but also in the academic classroom as they vie for college admissions and scholarships. Victorious politicians often lord their entrusted authority over the very people they were elected to serve instead of trying to improve their lives. The attainment of wealth...even if it is accomplished largely through inheritance...is widely interpreted to be a yardstick measuring how superior one is to another...especially by those enjoying more fortunate circumstances. And look at all of the competitive reality and awards shows on TV these days, repeatedly pounding home the theme that superiority over others is ultimately the only thing that matters. I'm sixty years old now with some accumulated life experience and can confidently say, without a shadow of doubt, that the minute I start to think I'm better than someone else, I become acutely aware of how, in so many different ways, I compare poorly to them. We all have places within our lives in which we shine...these are areas we're inclined to make public as we try to present the best possible impression of ourselves. But in trying to be superior to others, we fall into the trap of turning interactions and relationships into a continual, wearisome competition. Instead, as Hemingway pointed out, honest self-examination will direct us to a higher road...to improve our own whole being, including those areas generally hidden from the scrutiny of others...
I offer a caveat to this all, which is that there is nothing inherently wrong with competition...after all, other people who excel at things can be great models to emulate and they offer a way for me to be learn to excel when I follow their thinking and behavior, while staying focused on the goal: making myself a better person than before...
Thinking in terms of a life spent, not in trying to one-up the next guy, but rather in personal transformation, sounds very wise...but in following Ernest Hemingway's advice, I'm going up against a deeply embedded pattern within our society that idolizes competition and "winners"...
The above quote from Ernest Hemingway, the great twentieth-century American author whose birthday is today, runs contrary to the overly competitive world around us. Nowadays it's all about who's number one, or the best...and if you're not, you'd better get on the ball if you don't want to be replaced. Our schools pit students against each other not only on the athletic field, but also in the academic classroom as they vie for college admissions and scholarships. Victorious politicians often lord their entrusted authority over the very people they were elected to serve instead of trying to improve their lives. The attainment of wealth...even if it is accomplished largely through inheritance...is widely interpreted to be a yardstick measuring how superior one is to another...especially by those enjoying more fortunate circumstances. And look at all of the competitive reality and awards shows on TV these days, repeatedly pounding home the theme that superiority over others is ultimately the only thing that matters. I'm sixty years old now with some accumulated life experience and can confidently say, without a shadow of doubt, that the minute I start to think I'm better than someone else, I become acutely aware of how, in so many different ways, I compare poorly to them. We all have places within our lives in which we shine...these are areas we're inclined to make public as we try to present the best possible impression of ourselves. But in trying to be superior to others, we fall into the trap of turning interactions and relationships into a continual, wearisome competition. Instead, as Hemingway pointed out, honest self-examination will direct us to a higher road...to improve our own whole being, including those areas generally hidden from the scrutiny of others...
I offer a caveat to this all, which is that there is nothing inherently wrong with competition...after all, other people who excel at things can be great models to emulate and they offer a way for me to be learn to excel when I follow their thinking and behavior, while staying focused on the goal: making myself a better person than before...
Thinking in terms of a life spent, not in trying to one-up the next guy, but rather in personal transformation, sounds very wise...but in following Ernest Hemingway's advice, I'm going up against a deeply embedded pattern within our society that idolizes competition and "winners"...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
