The Barriers of Space Exploration

As I have mentioned a few days earlier here, I'm now in the process of rereading many of the late science fiction writer Isaac Asimov's book series about robots, the Empire, and Foundation...which he wrote over a span of four decades and number around fifteen volumes.  Their unifying theme is the advancement of humanity in space travel and settlement, something necessitating an innovation that current science...according to the theory of general relativity...says is impossible: travel at faster than the speed of light. The common belief that the light barrier can be somehow circumvented is partially due to the earlier notion of a sound "barrier", which never really existed and was disproven after aircraft first "broke" it decades ago.  In reality, space exploration is still possible while slower-than-light travel drastically restricts our ability to reach even nearby star systems, but in my opinion there are two another barriers almost as formidable as the light barrier, and which have hampered our space program ever since the mid-1960s: the boredom and budget barriers...

While the Gemini phase of the Apollo program to the moon was going on in the mid-sixties, TV networks would preempt their regular programming for hours-on-end and...along with merciful interruptions for commercials...would show on-screen simulations of what was going on, with the scratchy sounds of astronauts and ground control communicating back and forth. In the meantime, Star Trek was a popular alternative and showed a different picture of space travel using the warp drive to get around all that wasted time and always having suspense and character drama to rivet the viewer's attention.  Even when the moon landing first happened on July 20, 1969, and millions across the world were watching the events live, once the astronauts got out there on the surface and made their statements, there wasn't really much to report on...or stay tuned in for.  By the time of the Apollo 13 mission in early 1970, the networks began to curb their coverage due to lack of viewer interest.  Then-President Nixon cancelled the final three Apollo moon missions (18, 19, and 20) and was going to cancel Apollo 16 and 17 as well when Caspar Weinberger, budget director at the time, persuaded him not to.  Since then we've been in low-Earth orbit...when we could actually shoot a rocket up into space, that is.  President George W. Bush laid out an ambitious plan to return to the moon and establish a more permanent presence, but his successor Barack Obama scrubbed that plan, stating that "we've already been there".  And the current president, Donald Trump, has reset the focus to go back to the moon.  But suppose he loses in 2020?  His successor would doubtless change everything once again...

The public at-large wants Star Wars, Star Trek, and space-themed video games, but the reality of space travel can challenge their patience and ever-dwindling attention spans.  And with success inevitably comes the political fallout...from both conservatives and liberals...as people ask whether the money spent for the space program could be better used in other areas.  In a speech the other day commemorating the 50th anniversary of the first moon landing, Vice-President Pence said that the return mission to the moon will take place in 2024.  Sure, unless another president comes along and turns everything upside-down. Sigh...here we go again...