Vettel Right About College Athlete Pay

Yesterday afternoon I was listening to my radio, tuned in to sports talk radio station 850/WRUF-AM.  The local host, Larry Vettel, was discussing the push by some in college sports to pay athletes for their work.  His position was that it would be a mistake to pay all collegiate athletes in all sports across the board, since some sports don't take in the revenue to support paying them.  He doesn't believe that the higher grossing, more popular sports like football and basketball should be burdened with funding pay for athletes in minor sports.  I agree with him, as well as his contention that it would be fair, though, for athletes to be compensated in proportion to the amount of revenue that their sport was generating.  I remember just a couple of years ago when the usually dominant University of Florida football team was experiencing an off year, with their normally explosive offense in "sputter" mode.  Local businesses suffered as a result, meaning that they had been feeding off and profiting from the labors of the local athletes.  Those athletes have a marketable skill and should not be denied the opportunity to benefit from it.  On Saturday in the fall, college football fever generates enormous profits for its schools, communities, and the television networks and stations broadcasting the games. Something very similar happens the next day, on Sunday, when the professionals play.  Why should one group be discriminated against while the other rakes in the riches?

Mr. Vetell did make one caveat to his endorsement of collegiate athletes being paid for their work, besides the condition he made that they reflect the marketability of their sport.  Before anyone gets paid, those participating in the minor sports should receive FULL scholarships and not the flimsy HALF scholarships that are doled out.  Sounds reasonable to me; actually, I wasn't even aware of "half" scholarships in this area...