Popular Vote Winners in Last Eight Presidential Elections

Here are the popular vote winners in the American presidential elections since 1992.  Since we're supposedly a republic governed by the people's voice in democratic elections and a fair, unbiased system of laws, you might think that our policies and government would reflect the below trend...but you'd be wrong...

1992    DEMOCRAT

1996    DEMOCRAT

2000    DEMOCRAT

2004    REPUBLICAN

2008    DEMOCRAT

2012    DEMOCRAT

2016    DEMOCRAT

2020    DEMOCRAT

Now in 2024, do you think anyone really cares about what is going on in this campaign except within a small number of swing states like Wisconsin, Georgia, Michigan and Pennsylvania?  Because of our electoral college system, if you live in California, Texas, Florida or New York...our country's most populous states...no one cares about your opinion.  A losing president can call the chief elections officer of a state he closely lost and ask him to manufacture nonexistent votes to turn the results around, or the losing party can maneuver in states they lost...but legislatively control...to have those legislatures overturn those results.  Who cares what the rest of the country thinks, as long as they get their power.  Of course, as an individual my degree of influence is strictly limited, which is why I haven't been ranting and raving on this blog like others do on their social media outlets.  After all, we now have a Supreme Court that treats one side as its client interest: even if the doddering and incoherent incumbent nobody had a voice in choosing this year as the nominee wins those swing states, will they turn around and negate the results? Democracy is an illusion, both in Russia and now, sadly, here in America.  I have my own life, with the choices I can make that actually have effects on myself and my loved ones...electoral politics provide no hope in that regard...

Weekly Short Stories: 1991 Science Fiction, Part 4

Once again, it's Wednesday and time for me to continue with my look back at the year 1991 as I review three more sci-fi short stories appearing in the anthology The Year's Best Science Fiction, Ninth Annual Collection, edited by the late Gardner Dozois and featuring his picks from that year. In '91 Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, an icon in the civil rights movement, after 24 years on the bench, announced his retirement.  The Republican president at the time, George (H.W.) Bush, nominated very conservative judge Clarence Thomas, another African American, as Marshall's replacement.  Although the Democratic majority in the Senate wasn't enthusiastic about a conservative justice replacing a liberal as it would change the dynamics of future cases and rulings, unlike Republican Mitch McConnell with his more recent stonewalling of Merrick Garland, they processed Thomas' nomination. And even though Anita Hill accused Thomas of past sexual harassment, he was narrowly confirmed...and is now the senior justice on the Court.  But as I like to say, back to those stories... 

DISPATCHES FROM THE REVOLUTION by Pat Cadigan

This is another of those tedious "what if" alternative history stories, focusing on the 1968 Chicago anti-war protests during that tumultuous election year.  The lefties are the good guys here and the righties...especially Ronald Reagan...are portrayed as the evil villains.  I think the author was saying here that even if the tragic assassinations of Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King that year turned out differently, horrible things would still have happened as they were all symptoms of an underlying sickness in the country.  It's up to the reader to agree or not with that premise...

PIPES by Robert Reed

There's a project in the future, kind of like Jurassic Park, where extinct prehistoric animals are to be brought back into existence and set in a vast reserve in the American plains, accessible to the wealthy and elite for study and entertainment.  The scientist spearheading it all has everything down about the needed genetic codes down on his computer in his apartment, when a Native American plumber pays him a visit to fix his pipes.  The point of his appearance soon becomes clear when he, apparently already aware of the project, proposes that the Indians also be returned their land that was taken from them.  A thoughtful and funny ending...

MATTER'S END by Gregory Benford

Trying to prove the decay of protons is a formidable task, especially in India of the future where much of the population has grown hostile to science and technology after biological "innovations" have unintentionally decimated their agriculture and even bred tiny predatory fish that lodge themselves in people's urinary tracts...shudder!  But deep beneath the surface near Bangalore is a facility that reports to have evidence that the world's scientific community has been waiting for...a western scientist is there to ascertain the experiment's validity and report on it.  The result: let's just say that once again here is a tale that pretends that religious dogma...in this case of India...rings of literal truth.  And that perceptions of truth...even greatly exaggerated...can create new truths, if you can wrap your head around that.  By the way, Benford is an astrophysicist as well as a sci-fi writer: he knows his science at least...

Next week: still more stories of 1991 discussed from Dozois' book...

Miscellany: Coffee Shop, SCOTUS, Local Weather

Where I work, the policy is for my annual leave accumulation to cap out at a specific number of hours: at year's end any leave I have left over exceeding that cap will disappear...and I found that I needed to taken extra paid days off in order not to lose them.  So here I am in the middle of a three-day weekend, sitting at my nearby donut shop drinking iced coffee and writing this blog article.  Normally I would have been at the national coffee chain store down the road doing the same thing, but they've been behaving in a manner lately unbecoming to a business that purports to value the customer, closing their dining area in an almost random manner while the manager, when it is open with the necessarily limited number of seats due to COVID-19, always seems intent on occupying one of them.  Three times I've gone there recently and they were closed, and three times I've gone there with no available seating: enough is enough, I've crossed over to the "other side"...

The other day I felt compelled to write a "politics" article, something that I had been studiously intent on avoiding during this most disturbing and divisive presidential election campaign season. Yet I felt the topic, concerning Justice Ginsburg's replacement on the US Supreme Court, demanded that I address it.  Concerning a solidly conservative Court after Trump's pick, federal judge Amy Coney Barrett, is almost certainly destined for fast-track Senate confirmation, I have a different perspective than do many of my more liberal friends who are understandably concerned about this body's marked shift in ideology.  Maybe I'll express some of my thoughts in the future...I'm afraid it all might take up much more writing space than I'm accustomed to using in my daily blog articles...

Looks like the weather around my home Gainesville area is on the upswing, with the extreme precipitation, heat and humidity characterizing the previous several weeks diminishing substantially.  The ground throughout my neighborhood had become waterlogged: when stepping on any of it I would literally sink down into the dirt mud.  Now the ground is solid, weather conditions are more bearable, and I'm ready for more outdoor weekend distance runs: today seems like a pretty good day to get out there, so I think I'll "close up shop" here and head for home...     

About the Republicans Filling Ginsburg's Supreme Court Seat

Now that Utah senator Mitt Romney has come down in favor of processing President Trump's upcoming nominee to the United States Supreme Court to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg...who sadly passed away this past Friday...it looks as if the Republicans will be able to push it on through, even though that party, led by Kentucky senator Mitch McConnell, refused to consider President Obama's pick of Merrick Garland to replace Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in February 2016...nine months before that year's presidential election.  That this current vacancy happened much closer to the election...less than two months before...does not matter, it seems.  Yes, the hypocrisy here is beyond belief and I understand the outrage spreading among many Americans...hopefully they'll translate it all into high numbers at the polls and defeat Trump, Majority Leader McConnell, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, and outspoken Committee member John Cornyn...all running for reelection and all extremely two-faced on this issue. As for McConnell's (and the rest of the GOP Senate's) hypocrisy, let me point out that you need to follow their actions and not their phony words justifying them.  Mitch McConnell has been very consistent in his manipulation of the rules of the Senate to push a strictly partisan Republican agenda and to marginalize the Democratic side of the chamber as much as possible.  It's the rationalizations, the words he and his colleagues spew out to excuse their actions, that ring false...not their unstated motivations.  Democrats in the Senate are understandably upset at the actions of their counterparts but have themselves contributed to the rancor and division building up here over the past few decades.  McConnell feels he's on a roll and is unaccountable for what he's doing...only electoral defeat will ever restrain him and he's already said as much during a brief recent rare outburst of honesty.  Am I angry at what's happening here? Not really...I've known Senator McConnell for what the person he is, going on several years, and predicted long ago that he would weasel out of delaying a Supreme Court nomination should a vacancy occur in 2020.  I am disappointed, though, at the so-called "leaders" comprising the rest of the Republican Senate caucus for caving in to him time and time again...including Mr. Romney, who voted earlier this year to convict (and thereby remove from office) the very president who will be deciding on the late Justice Ginsburg's replacement: sir, if you didn't think back then that Trump should remain in office, then why do you think now that he should be allowed to pick the next Supreme Court justice before the American people themselves can render their own verdict on his fitness for the presidency?